mishra Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 2 hours ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: Then there should be no issue if Bcci abstains from icc tournaments. And where ICC gets its revenue from? Australia/England? They dont pay a penny off there earning. Forget actual MPA invocation, A 50% chance of BCCI to invoke MPA will mean a sugnificant drop in ICC revenue. Link to comment
gattaca Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 (edited) No wonder the British conquered India. India was conquered because of stupid Indian kings unity their thinking was narrow. This is history repeating itself. The CA and ECB trying to do same. Manohar is probably like the scindia King who was responsible for defeat of Jhansi. Edited March 25, 2017 by gattaca Ultimate_Game and putrevus 2 Link to comment
Sajid_Rana Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 PCB back door dealings working fine. Link to comment
Adi_91 Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, Sajid_Rana said: PCB back door dealings working fine. Good to see the claim from a Pakistani. We here in ICF are not surprised that your board is involved in these "shady" deals. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Manohar to remain in position until June 2018. The alternative would've been Giles Clarke. I somehow feel Manohar is the better option currently Link to comment
Khota Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Snake in the grass. Leading the most corrupt organization in the world. How does he not have a conflict of interest in this case? He has an axe to grind. Please go away. Link to comment
Khota Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Sirni was a great administrator but he was corrupt too. He is also partly to be blamed for SC intervention. Manohar is modern day Mir Jaffar. CG 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 1 hour ago, Sachinism said: Manohar to remain in position until June 2018. The alternative would've been Giles Clarke. I somehow feel Manohar is the better option currently Manohar is the front-man for Giles. Giles faction needed to keep the charade of "World Cricket" against BCCI for as long as possible. They need an Indian face to hide behind. Why would a guy who claimed he needed to resign a couple of months ago for urgent personal reasons, suddenly turn around and agree to stay on for 2 years? He's made his deal at the right time with the Giles faction - and milked them to the max. If Zim and WI got 19 and 40 mm respectively, how much Manohar mek? Probably at least that much. Vilander and Ironhide 2 Link to comment
Kriterion Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 On 3/24/2017 at 1:26 PM, Malcolm Merlyn said: Let the 9 other members get majority of the revenues and not feed of BCCI and we can talk about democracy. Umm, thats a plutocracy, not a democracy. Nice try tho. Vilander 1 Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Umm, thats a plutocracy, not a democracy. Nice try tho. Not try.If you want equal share of profits bring equal revenue. Vilander and JaFanatic 2 Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 If not for the betting scandal which led to involvement of SC in Indian cricket, BCCI would not have been at such low. JaFanatic 1 Link to comment
Vilander Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 On 3/24/2017 at 2:33 PM, Stumped said: Except it's the ICCs revenue they're feeding off and not the BCCIs isn't it. no its not , its ICC revenues from India but you already know that isn't it. sandeep 1 Link to comment
mishra Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 (edited) CoA invites him for IPL 10 finals. Hope crowd gives him and CoA middle finger salute. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/m.timesofindia.com/sports/cricket/ipl/top-stories/coa-invites-shashank-manohar-for-ipl-final/amp_articleshow/58605324.cms Edited May 10, 2017 by mishra JaFanatic 1 Link to comment
Vilander Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Manohar = product of mumbai lobby = traitor. Link to comment
Vilander Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 (edited) great POV "British have a saying about their colonial rule in India, it is: “India, A country we used to rule with just Two blokes on a Bike”. One might wonder as to how a country as big as India (400 million people in 1947) could be ruled by just handful of Britishers? The answer is simple, with the help of Indians, or should we say, Traitor Indians. Shashank Manohar comes from this category of Indian traitors, who have no love/respect for their country, people like him will any day sell their motherland’s interests to highest bidders. These people are willing to go all out in order to destroy India for the sake of their new found interests. Look at the absurdity of this deal: Indian cricket generates 70%+ revenue for ICC, Yet! it has no veto right in ICC, it only gets 20% of the total revenue and the decision to cut this revenue down to 10% was made in the committee to which BCCI was not even invited. ICC is very interested in giving more rights to smaller boards, Well! What about acceptable rights to Indian Cricket Board, why don’t we have Veto rights in ICC even after carrying the monetary weight of the entire ICC on our shoulders. Its like if China+Russia decide to cut US influence at united nations without involving US into the debate and on top of some absurd fact that US doesn’t even have veto right even after paying 70% of UN’s budget with the help of an Ex US president, YEAH its never going to happen because Americans love their country unlike us Indian idiots. So this is the reason for Shashank Manohar to go against BCCI, it is in his blood to disown his own country’s interest in order to safeguard his position in ICC, as doors for politicians in BCCI are closed(after supreme court ruling) and he wants to take away as much money as possible from BCCI to ICC, so that his future maneuvers in ICC are worth something. Boards like Australia, England, South Africa and Pakistan are celebrating the defeat and dissection of Indian cricket, the COA(created by Supreme Court of India) is a stupid body with incredible amount of naivety, their purpose is to look cool and diplomatic in front of white people in ICC meetings and do hell with indian cricket’s future. So bottom line is “Indian Cricket is Doomed” " Also, i am surprised that parties like MNS or Shiv Sena are not reacting to this non sense by a Maharashtrian himself. They are very quick to fight puny actors and directors or some poor powerless book publisher, BUT when indian interest’s are actually being destroyed by these powerful traitors they act like nothing is happening. BCCI Admin’s 2 Weeks in Office: Structure, Sackings, Revenue Loss? https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Shashank-Manohar-against-the-BCCI-as-ICC-chairman Edited May 10, 2017 by Vilander Link to comment
surajmal Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 45 minutes ago, mishra said: CoA invites him for IPL 10 finals. Hope crowd gives him and CoA middle finger salute. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/m.timesofindia.com/sports/cricket/ipl/top-stories/coa-invites-shashank-manohar-for-ipl-final/amp_articleshow/58605324.cms Gungadeens are goading Namo govt. to react, I see no other reason for such audacity. Tells you something about this lot though that they would destroy national assets just to score political points. JaFanatic 1 Link to comment
mishra Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 30 minutes ago, surajmal said: Gungadeens are goading Namo govt. to react, I see no other reason for such audacity. Tells you something about this lot though that they would destroy national assets just to score political points. + I think personnel meets are done to do dodgy deals. CoA kept delivered their part of promise to Manohar, now they want their paychecque JaFanatic 1 Link to comment
Khota Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 This is Indian money and needs to stay in India. mishra 1 Link to comment
Vilander Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 7 hours ago, Stumped said: "No, it's not the ICCs revenue, it's the ICCs revenue". Alright then. what ever the * you mean by that. But the point is its Indian paying publics' money meant for Indian cricket not for subsidizing terrorists or colonialists. eagleeye and JaFanatic 2 Link to comment
sandeep Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 6 hours ago, Vilander said: what ever the * you mean by that. But the point is its Indian paying publics' money meant for Indian cricket not for subsidizing terrorists or colonialists. Don't waste your time @Stumped will continue to argue disingenuously and ignore the valid points you make. He will refuse to acknowledge that the a minimum of 70% of the "ICC revenue" is from Indian sources. Vilander 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now