Jump to content

Trade in Strategic Timeout for a DRS Review?


Texan

Recommended Posts

As it is with the strategic timeouts, the bowling and batting side can take some time off to slow down proceedings. I think it would be more beneficial for the game and make it fair if these strategic timeouts could be substituted for reviews. Basically, teams should have both options. If they use up a review, they lose a strategic timeout and vice versa. That way, the game isn't delayed and teams have more flexibility about how to use up their time and also controversial decisions are eliminated.

 

Stakes are high here and ensuring decisions are correct and umpires are kept honest is prudent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, velu said:

timeouts is for making money :hehe:

 

They can still make money with the Review. Call it Patanjali Review or something and show Baba Ramdev doing asanas while decision is pending. Can also go into a timeout for remaining time (timeout time minus time utilized by review). In fact, this could actually lead to more income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stumped said:

I assume in India the timeouts always have ads in them for television viewers? Can't play ads if there's a review ongoing.

BCCI can have a sponsor for the review similar to the way they have Yes Bank six and other stuff. That should suffice to rake in the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...