Jump to content

Shikhar Dhawan!!!


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Pollack said:

Hales and Roy are pretty poor choices to rate. Hales is good but why Roy? :facepalm:Also Amla gets unfair criticism. Yes he doesn't play kohli,dekock type of innings but he adds runs a plenty at very good strike rate.

Too early to judge Roy , hes going through a bad patch still has a 100+ Sr . 

Amla is not bad , hes alright but his stats are massively inflated . Hes useless chasing anything more than a 280 unless its WI  and even batting first disappears against good attacks . 

Link to comment
7 hours ago, gattaca said:

Always big match player. Dropped for rahane in wt20 vs wi have to say worst decision from shastri.

That decision probably cost us the match coz Dhawan would've either got out earlier or made a 50+ score after facing 36 deliveries. Either way he would've played for the team rather than pottered around for himself. Shares the same trait as Raina in that respect.

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, putrevus said:

People want KL Rahul instead of him, Dhawan is a big match player who can handle pressure very well.He is equally good in chasing which is a big plus and when he scores a hundred India generally wins.

Forget 100! India win most of the times when he scores a 50+ score.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, randomGuy said:

Mumbai quota.

Mumbai quota, Delhi quota etc is all nonsense 99.9% of time. Although Rahane's selection for that match was in remaining 0.1% since Ravi Shashtri who is biased for Mumbai players actually had the power to influence his selection. Most of the time it is all bullsheet whined by sore losers who cannot bear successful Mumbai players out of jealous.

Link to comment
On 6/4/2017 at 4:42 PM, Manny_Pacquiao said:

most indian cricket followers, like most sports fans anywhere in the world, are short-sighted, fair weather imbeciles.

 

shikhar dhawan is a PHENOMENAL one day batsman. always has been.

 

fastest indian to 3000 runs, and he averages 43.26 @ a strike rate of 90. he has 9 hundreds in 77 games, and as far as i remember, india has hardly ever lost when he scores 50.

 

easily one of india's best one day batsmen, and could possibly be one of india's best ever if he keeps going like this.

Spoken like a true predator :p:

 

 

I agree always the big match player. Scored against saf on the big mcg ground too in 2015 wc.

Link to comment
On 6/6/2017 at 9:44 PM, putrevus said:

People want KL Rahul instead of him, Dhawan is a big match player who can handle pressure very well.He is equally good in chasing which is a big plus and when he scores a hundred India generally wins.

 

Yes. I want KL Rahul instead of Dhawan (not if Dhawan performs like this every game) but the fact is he doesn't. Sometimes the eye-test gives you more than anything else, KL Rahul or even Pant (or both) should be the  opening batsman going forward (not right away) but moving forward.

 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, PandeyJee said:

Yes. I want KL Rahul instead of Dhawan (not if Dhawan performs like this every game) but the fact is he doesn't. Sometimes the eye-test gives you more than anything else, KL Rahul or even Pant (or both) should be the  opening batsman going forward (not right away) but moving forward.

 

Dhawan is a different beast when it comes to icc tournaments .No other batsmàn even comes closein recent years.

 

And his odi is record in general is pretty excellent as well.

 

He generally is a very consistent Batsman.

 

Where he sucks and struggles for consistency is T20s and tests.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...