Tendu_10 Posted June 29, 2017 Author Share Posted June 29, 2017 YES, It is a right thing or India would have been a terrorist country like pak. 55 45 split would tech mean daily fights over religion and religion of peace headed by brainwashed leaders like Owasi wouldn't let anyone live in peace... This is exactly how things would have fold out 1947 still one country India 47- 1950 Daily fights overs religion 50-1960 Civil war would have took place 1960 agreement over quotas of 50 50 in everything 60-1980 religion of peace on a mission to conquer whole India and convert Hindus to Islam or kill them 80-2000 Daily diwali(blasts) by religion of peace... headed by terrorists 2000-2017 would have been a complete shithole and USA will invade us saying we have secret nukes and steal our oil:hehe: small left over reserves im not tryin to say all of the musulmans are terrorists. many are good people but whenever u get a large concentration of them. there will always be a certain section of radical n hostile ones who cause trouble. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Perfect example of the Muslim hatred prevalent in the Hindutva society of India perpetuated by falsehoods through WhatsApp groups run by jaahils I was talking about in another thread. In the 1946 election being referred to here, only around 4% of the Muslim population was eligible to vote comprising of elites who largely favored the idea of Pakistan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasgulla Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 12 hours ago, Tendu_10 said: im not tryin to say all of the musulmans are terrorists. many are good people but whenever u get a large concentration of them. there will always be a certain section of radical n hostile ones who cause trouble. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk No one is saying that but the reality is they are so easy to brainwash in the name of religion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 No one is saying that but the reality is they are so easy to brainwash in the name of religion... yes out of all religions they have largest proportion of people who can be radicalised who follow it literally. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasgulla Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, Tendu_10 said: yes out of all religions they have largest proportion of people who can be radicalised who follow it literally. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk That's why education is important... It could cut down 80% for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Perfect example of the Muslim hatred prevalent in the Hindutva society of India perpetuated by falsehoods through WhatsApp groups run by jaahils I was talking about in another thread. In the 1946 election being referred to here, only around 4% of the Muslim population was eligible to vote comprising of elites who largely favored the idea of Pakistan. bhai if india remained one. it would have suffered a lot more islamic terror n attempted shariaisation from musulmans Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 That's why education is important... It could cut down 80% for sure definitely education against religious dogma is what is needed within muslim community. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk_Diggler Posted July 3, 2017 Share Posted July 3, 2017 I'm not really an expert on partition and the movement/mandate for it. What was it like pre partition? Was there hostility and hate or did everyone reside peacefully together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Gunga din shadow boxing A valid statistical sample size is a Hindutva conspiracy I wonder if gunga also applies the same logic to the Indian constitution, which was formed by people who weren't elected via universal franchise. 4% sarchasm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 if there was no partition there would have been a bloody civil war in 1970's. so yeah its better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rageaddict Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 (edited) Partition hasn't saved India from any Civil Wars but has only delayed the inevitable by 100 years. Giving a false perception of Hindu -Muslim Unity only till Muslim Numbers are not strong enough to demand another partition based on religion. Muslims from Bombay, Gujarat, Hindi Belt and Malabar voted massively in favor of Muslim Pakistan and their leader Jinnah, thereby helping the Muslims in predominantly Muslim areas to establish their own Islamic Country. Edited July 8, 2017 by rageaddict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rageaddict Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 In words of Pakistan Born Canadian Writer Tarek Fateh Responding to another query, he said 95% of Muslims of Deoband, Bareli,Patna, Bombay, Madras voted for Muslim League leader Mohammad Ali Jinnah for creation of Pakistan. “They butchered this country (India) and stayed back to get Haj subsidy,” he added. Apt description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 No it was not, in my opinion. We would have been much better off without the partition. We lost land, people and gained what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 3 hours ago, Haarkarjeetgaye said: No it was not, in my opinion. We would have been much better off without the partition. We lost land, people and gained what? LOL most delusional post in the history of ICF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 7 minutes ago, Gollum said: LOL most delusional post in the history of ICF. yours too. Please highlight the gains if you can. Losses are plenty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Haarkarjeetgaye said: yours too. Please highlight the gains if you can. Losses are plenty. If there were no partition there would be daily communal violence all over India. We would be the no 1 terrorist country in the world and NWFP, FATA, Balochistan would be uncontrollable. Osama would have been in India, as would Hafiz Saeed, D and thousand others. We would be bordering AFG which is one of the most volatile regions on Earth for the last 3 decades. Even Xinjiang would be bordering India then, another terror infested region. Non Muslims would be systematically cleansed in many areas and India would have become like present day Syria. Pakistan is mineral poor, water deficient and has 1.5% forest cover. What is it that we gain by having such a resource poor province with all the negatives. Intellectually too they aren't super smart, just like an average Indian, certainly not like Bongs or Tamils, so even human resource there is poor. Can write an essay on this but late for work. Bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 48 minutes ago, Gollum said: If there were no partition there would be daily communal violence all over India. We would be the no 1 terrorist country in the world and NWFP, FATA, Balochistan would be uncontrollable. Osama would have been in India, as would Hafiz Saeed, D and thousand others. We would be bordering AFG which is one of the most volatile regions on Earth for the last 3 decades. Even Xinjiang would be bordering India then, another terror infested region. Non Muslims would be systematically cleansed in many areas and India would have become like present day Syria. Pakistan is mineral poor, water deficient and has 1.5% forest cover. What is it that we gain by having such a resource poor province with all the negatives. Intellectually too they aren't super smart, just like an average Indian, certainly not like Bongs or Tamils, so even human resource there is poor. Can write an essay on this but late for work. Bye. All hypothesis. None may have existed if we were together. Russia would have never dared to reach Afghanistan and US would have never come to Afghanistan. Hypothetical again. Yet if you believe there were benefits, let's have one more for the benefits. Bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 losses - deaths, loss of land, loss of people, emotional trauma, wasteful spending on defence by both separated sides, deaths still continue, a torn Kashmir, two fronts to tackle etc, loss of good bowlers ( cricket forum) Classify people into two types. One who do not give a **** about religion and can exist peacefully with others. For them it was obviously a loss. Two, people who think that Hindus and Muslims cannot live together. You got an unfinished deal. The problem still exists. What benefit is anyone making out of the partition keeping the cost in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Some of you must have seen this coverage on the partition of India. If not the whole thing, suggest going through the last 5 minutes. There are people who did not want it and still do not understand what anyone has gained from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Certainly best thing to happen. Hindus can live and try to live peacefully but I doubt if peaceful can live peacefully with Hindus... The migration still continues so as to take the benefit of the progress Hindus make... The peaceful community present will continue to drag other progressing communities behind to their level... Rarely contribute to the progress of the nation... The many in the peaceful community doesn't believe in national boundaries, nationhood etc. Given an option they'll ditch the nation and follow the call foreign based religion... Gollum and Tibarn 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts