SK_IH Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 i can still digest pant not given chances but playing dk ,is this some kind of joke or something.mind boggling,baffling lol wtf is going on tweaker, Sidhoni and beetle 3 Link to comment
tweaker Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Very insecure from Kohli Mosher and beetle 2 Link to comment
SK_IH Posted July 6, 2017 Author Share Posted July 6, 2017 why would kohli be insecure ,he is a superstar n legend ,what cant he simply understand dinesh kartik adds nothing to side at present or for future or he simply doesnt care? Link to comment
kosingh Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Greg Chappell said Karthik is captaincy material and a very good batsman who will play for India for a long time. Link to comment
Mosher Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, SK_IH said: why would kohli be insecure ,he is a superstar n legend ,what cant he simply understand dinesh kartik adds nothing to side at present or for future or he simply doesnt care? Insecure of his buddies losing their spot if some youngster takes it away with some good performances. Link to comment
fineleg Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 (edited) somethin fishy goin on? some insecurity or buddies-alliance or agency money at play? no idea wtf Edited July 6, 2017 by fineleg beetle 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 VK has a very old school approach to 'earning' selection. I remember a few years ago when he was given the captaincy for one of those Zimbabwe tours where we selected a bunch of developmental prospects in the squad - Parvez Rasool made the squad, and even with India winning every single game of the series, VK never gave him a game. He may even have said something about the senior players being fit and available, so why should I deprive them of the opportunity. Pollack, Ankit_sharma03 and beetle 3 Link to comment
jusarrived Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 22 minutes ago, SK_IH said: i can still digest pant not given chances but playing dk ,is this some kind of joke or something.mind boggling,baffling lol wtf is going on Am one of the few who rate DK very highly , I know he will disappoint again and probably undeserving , but am still fine . :) Link to comment
jusarrived Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 7 minutes ago, sandeep said: VK has a very old school approach to 'earning' selection. I remember a few years ago when he was given the captaincy for one of those Zimbabwe tours where we selected a bunch of developmental prospects in the squad - Parvez Rasool made the squad, and even with India winning every single game of the series, VK never gave him a game. He may even have said something about the senior players being fit and available, so why should I deprive them of the opportunity. Did Dhoni play in that series ? otherwise it makes no sense . He makes killer team selection when MS is not around #icflogic Sidhoni and Ankit_sharma03 2 Link to comment
sandeep Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, jusarrived said: Did Dhoni play in that series ? otherwise it makes no sense . He makes killer team selection when MS is not around #icflogic Karthik was keeper that series, MS was 'rested', that's why VK was Skipper in that 2013 Zim tour. Rasool rode the bench for 5 ODIs, inspite of a 5-0 scoreline. I don't think that can be attributed to agents and Bunty etc all that nonsense. You can see the pattern in VK's thinking - he is not a guy who's open to giving the bench players a game for the sake of it. Link to comment
SK_IH Posted July 6, 2017 Author Share Posted July 6, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, jusarrived said: Am one of the few who rate DK very highly , I know he will disappoint again and probably undeserving , but am still fine . :) look at england giving chance to every young player they have in reserve ,last game morgan sat out to play malan and he became man of match and look at kohli's thinking,playing kartik is akin englang bringing back ian bell Edited July 6, 2017 by SK_IH Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Playing Yuvi had some logic -- they think he will play 2019, experienced player, yaari dosti etc etc How can you explain playing DK?? Link to comment
Tibarn Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 He had a good domestic season He had a good IPL He was part of our CT winning squad, batting at 4, in 2013 Link to comment
cricketfan28 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 very disappointing, what the point of selecting PANT? .. Link to comment
SK_IH Posted July 6, 2017 Author Share Posted July 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Tibarn said: He had a good domestic season He had a good IPL He was part of our CT winning squad, batting at 4, in 2013 let me add to this ,he amazingly stumped michael vaughan on his debut Link to comment
Tibarn Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 1 minute ago, SK_IH said: let me add to this ,he amazingly stumped michael vaughan on his debut You can complain that the CT was 4 years ago, but his performance in this past domestics and IPL season showed he was in form. He's not the main player who's in the team for past reputation. There are 3 players who deserve to be tossed before him. Link to comment
SK_IH Posted July 6, 2017 Author Share Posted July 6, 2017 Just now, Tibarn said: You can complain that the CT was 4 years ago, but his performance in this past domestics and IPL season showed he was in form. He's not the main player who's in the team for past reputation. There are 3 players who deserve to be tossed before him. many players had better ipl than this guy Link to comment
Tibarn Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 1 minute ago, SK_IH said: many players had better ipl than this guy Sure, I'm not saying he should be in the squad, I was just saying what I thought the selectors reasoning was. Really, I'm not sure Yuvi or DK would've played if Rahul was fit. Rahul got injured at the worst time. SK_IH 1 Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 It's simple. The likes of Rahane and Karthik are backed because they can be dumped anytime for Rohit and UV. Whereas if Pant clicks right away it's incredibly hard to drop him. Notice how Karthik gets to bat at no.4 whereas they're incredibly wary about Jadhav batting higher than 6. They know ke inki ceiling itni low hai ke top order mein khel ke bhi kuchh ukhaad nahin sakte. beetle and HemuChandra 2 Link to comment
SK_IH Posted July 7, 2017 Author Share Posted July 7, 2017 2 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said: It's simple. The likes of Rahane and Karthik are backed because they can be dumped anytime for Rohit and UV. Whereas if Pant clicks right away it's incredibly hard to drop him. Notice how Karthik gets to bat at no.4 whereas they're incredibly wary about Jadhav batting higher than 6. They know ke inki ceiling itni low hai ke top order mein khel ke bhi kuchh ukhaad nahin sakte. i dont believe all this theories,kohli cant act like a traitor lol Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now