velu Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 JaFanatic and tweaker 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandeep Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 Damn son, how old are you. 14? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 (edited) www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiNsXI7zzU4 Edited August 31, 2017 by randomGuy velu 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Bradley Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Edited September 1, 2017 by Sean Bradley MechEng and Tibarn 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuge Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 8 hours ago, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. This is an argument of convenience. I can promise you almost 90 % of all media content should be removed on rational of objectification alone. JaFanatic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Temujin Khaghan Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 I dont know about the quality of the ad but these wild stone "Kunal" ads sure hit the target they were aiming... last year it was the FOGG - Bina gas wali Deo... no one even knows why they were supposed to buy a Bina gas wali but there is nothing but an expression of disgust on the actors in that ad and last year they had an epic turnover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 LOL @velu are you as old as Butters? velu 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 2, 2017 Author Share Posted September 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Gollum said: LOL @velu are you as old as Butters? :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechEng Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 20 hours ago, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Yeah, don't get the point to show themselves as bold and cool in such crass ads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 On 02/09/2017 at 1:51 AM, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Incorrect argument. 1. It's not objectifying women. 2. It's clearly an ad which would make people buy this deodorant. If sales is the criterion, then this ad is clearly 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vayuu1 Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 I like Tata sky romantic ad and polo ek ajnabi hasina se Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Bradley Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/3/2017 at 11:08 PM, randomGuy said: Incorrect argument. 1. It's not objectifying women. 2. It's clearly an ad which would make people buy this deodorant. If sales is the criterion, then this ad is clearly 10/10. So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 16 minutes ago, Sean Bradley said: So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers! Even if one gets plenty of sex, he/she wants to be desirable in the eyes of opposite sex which makes this ad's appeal universal and not just appealing to 'sex starved tharki buyers' as you claim. velu 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Share Posted September 5, 2017 all these self proclaimed feminists should stop watching any of the movies bolly or holly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Share Posted September 5, 2017 44 minutes ago, Sean Bradley said: So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers! you shld be in a lalaland if you think people buy products because the ad expose skin .. ads are to there catch peoples attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Share Posted September 5, 2017 probably , carls jr should be far bigger than burger king if we apply the logic that tarkis buy based on how much the women is exposed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/2/2017 at 1:51 AM, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. who are you to define the character of a lady! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Bradley Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 Just now, rkt.india said: who are you to define the character of a lady! I am not defining the character but purely speaking up against the kinky message that this add is giving to the masses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts