express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) T20s have 120 balls per innings ..... if we consider top 7 batters then it means an average of 17 balls per batter Priority for 5 of those 7 batters usually is to score as many runs as possible in the balls they play rather than trying to build an innings. Good T20 teams generally tend to include a couple of 140+ SR batters ( one out of those two 150+ ) ..... most of them 128+ in terms of SR 1 ) T20I SR of our top 7 batters in today's T20I playing XI Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s V Kohli 2010-2017 51 46 12 1830 90* 53.82 1344 136.16 0 17 0 196 35 HH Pandya 2016-2017 20 10 0 100 31 10.00 75 133.33 0 0 1 7 5 KM Jadhav 2015-2017 8 5 0 95 58 19.00 72 131.94 0 1 0 9 2 RG Sharma 2007-2017 64 56 12 1373 106 31.20 1062 129.28 1 11 3 121 51 MS Dhoni 2006-2017 79 68 34 1212 56 35.64 983 123.29 0 1 1 83 36 MK Pandey 2015-2017 10 7 1 151 51* 25.16 125 120.80 0 1 2 6 6 S Dhawan 2011-2017 24 23 2 439 60 20.90 379 115.83 0 2 1 54 12 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=3;filter=advanced;orderby=batting_strike_rate;qualmin1=50;qualval1=runs;team=6;template=results;type=batting 2 ) Not a single batsman with SR of 140+.... forget 150+. 3 ) 3 batters with SR below 125 .... 4 batters with SR below 130 4 ) We have left out KL Rahul .... who has a SR of 149 5 ) Gavaskar asking for Rahane, with SR of 113, to replace Rahul with SR of 149 6) We have not included any high SR new batters like Krunal or Pant 7 ) Only 3 six-hitters in the squad ..... Hardik, Rohit, Rahul ...... only 2 in the playing 11. ( current-day ability ) 8 ) We are the 5th ranked team in T20Is now ( while being ranked 1 in both tests and ODIs ) .... so, this approach is not working in T20s. http://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/28970884 9 ) Top SRs in T20Is for reference. Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s A Symonds (AUS) 2005-2009 14 11 4 337 85* 48.14 199 169.34 0 2 2 33 10 GJ Maxwell (AUS) 2012-2017 37 33 4 839 145* 28.93 507 165.48 1 3 1 78 44 E Lewis (WI) 2016-2017 14 14 1 468 125* 36.00 302 154.96 2 2 1 26 40 Shahid Afridi (PAK) 2006-2016 98 90 12 1405 54* 18.01 932 150.75 0 4 8 102 73 NLTC Perera (SL/World) 2010-2017 60 51 19 761 49 23.78 506 150.39 0 0 5 59 38 C Munro (NZ) 2012-2017 32 29 5 601 101 25.04 403 149.13 1 3 4 41 38 KL Rahul (INDIA) 2016-2017 9 8 2 304 110* 50.66 204 149.01 1 1 1 29 11 AJ Finch (AUS) 2011-2017 32 32 3 1124 156 38.75 755 148.87 1 7 0 114 48 Najibullah Zadran (AFG) 2012-2017 40 32 13 643 60* 33.84 433 148.49 0 2 0 39 35 LE Bosman (SA) 2006-2010 14 14 1 323 94 24.84 219 147.48 0 3 2 27 20 DJG Sammy (WI/World) 2007-2017 68 52 18 587 42* 17.26 398 147.48 0 0 3 45 31 YK Pathan (INDIA) 2007-2012 22 18 5 236 37* 18.15 161 146.58 0 0 3 11 17 V Sehwag (INDIA) 2006-2012 19 18 0 394 68 21.88 271 145.38 0 2 1 43 16 CH Gayle (WI) 2006-2017 52 49 4 1577 117 35.04 1085 145.34 2 13 2 134 103 SR Watson (AUS) 2006-2016 58 56 6 1462 124* 29.24 1006 145.32 1 10 3 115 83 E Chigumbura (ZIM) 2006-2016 47 46 8 789 54* 20.76 543 145.30 0 3 5 56 46 ML Hayden (AUS) 2005-2007 9 9 3 308 73* 51.33 214 143.92 0 4 0 37 13 MN van Wyk (SA) 2007-2015 8 7 1 225 114* 37.50 157 143.31 1 1 0 19 14 Shafiqullah (AFG) 2010-2017 35 32 9 392 51* 17.04 274 143.06 0 1 4 29 23 JA Morkel (SA) 2005-2015 50 38 11 572 43 21.18 402 142.28 0 0 1 29 39 AC Gilchrist (AUS) 2005-2008 13 13 1 272 48 22.66 192 141.66 0 0 0 27 13 KP Pietersen (ENG) 2005-2013 37 36 5 1176 79 37.93 831 141.51 0 7 1 119 32 L Ronchi (AUS/NZ) 2008-2017 32 25 6 359 51* 18.89 254 141.33 0 1 4 30 14 RE Levi (SA) 2012-2012 13 13 2 236 117* 21.45 167 141.31 1 1 3 20 15 JDP Oram (NZ) 2005-2012 36 30 7 474 66* 20.60 339 139.82 0 2 3 38 22 DA Warner (AUS) 2009-2017 64 64 3 1694 90* 27.77 1213 139.65 0 12 5 164 74 JC Buttler (ENG) 2011-2017 57 49 11 1014 73* 26.68 731 138.71 0 5 3 72 46 Mohammad Nabi (AFG) 2010-2017 58 53 7 876 89 19.04 634 138.17 0 2 3 56 45 RR Rossouw (SA) 2014-2016 15 14 3 327 78 29.72 237 137.97 0 2 2 29 12 CJ Anderson (NZ) 2012-2017 29 22 3 432 94* 22.73 314 137.57 0 2 3 26 24 Sharjeel Khan (PAK) 2013-2016 15 15 0 360 59 24.00 262 137.40 0 2 0 48 13 LJ Wright (ENG) 2007-2014 51 45 5 759 99* 18.97 554 137.00 0 4 9 68 31 MN Waller (ZIM) 2011-2016 28 27 5 567 68 25.77 414 136.95 0 1 2 38 26 Mohammad Shahzad (AFG) 2010-2017 58 58 3 1779 118* 32.34 1300 136.84 1 12 3 200 66 GJ Bailey (AUS/World) 2012-2017 30 26 7 473 63 24.89 346 136.70 0 2 1 37 20 Yuvraj Singh (INDIA) 2007-2017 58 51 9 1177 77* 28.02 863 136.38 0 8 1 77 74 MEK Hussey (AUS) 2005-2012 38 30 11 721 60* 37.94 529 136.29 0 4 1 58 25 BB McCullum (NZ) 2005-2015 71 70 10 2140 123 35.66 1571 136.21 2 13 3 199 91 V Kohli (INDIA) 2010-2017 51 46 12 1830 90* 53.82 1344 136.16 0 17 0 196 35 MH Cross (SCOT) 2013-2017 23 18 1 392 60 23.05 288 136.11 0 1 1 42 16 Mashrafe Mortaza (BDESH) 2006-2017 54 39 11 377 36 13.46 277 136.10 0 0 6 28 23 DT Johnston (IRE) 2008-2013 30 19 7 249 62 20.75 184 135.32 0 1 1 13 11 AD Hales (ENG) 2011-2017 48 48 6 1383 116* 32.92 1022 135.32 1 7 4 148 42 Imran Nazir (PAK) 2007-2012 25 24 1 500 72 21.73 370 135.13 0 3 2 59 22 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=3;filter=advanced;orderby=batting_strike_rate;qualmin1=200;qualval1=runs;template=results;type=batting What do we plan to do about it ? Are we able to demarcate between T20Is and ODIs in terms of player types and team composition ? Edited October 7, 2017 by express bowling tweaker, Laaloo, rahulrulezz and 4 others 4 3 Link to comment
Popular Post sandeep Posted October 7, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 7, 2017 Its not a question of knowledge. Its a question of the "regulars" in the team willingly giving up lucrative spots in the national T20 team. If a player gets clubbed as a less effective T20 player, its going to impact his IPL contract numbers big-time. If you are expecting the likes of Dhawan or Dhoni to volunteer such massive $$ sacrifices, or expecting that Kuptaan Kohli is going to be ruthlessly meritocratic instead of "taking care" of his buddies, then you should go talk to Anil Kumble. Vk1, Vilander, beetle and 7 others 2 1 7 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, sandeep said: Its not a question of knowledge. It was a tongue-in-cheek statement .... I am not really implying a lack of knowledge regarding the need for high SR T20I batters. Quote Its a question of the "regulars" in the team willingly giving up lucrative spots in the national T20 team. If a player gets clubbed as a less effective T20 player, its going to impact his IPL contract numbers big-time. If you are expecting the likes of Dhawan or Dhoni to volunteer such massive $$ sacrifices, or expecting that Kuptaan Kohli is going to be ruthlessly meritocratic instead of "taking care" of his buddies, then you should go talk to Anil Kumble. Manish Pandey and Kedar Jadhav are not stars but are there Ashwin and Jadeja have been dropped, despite being big names. To me, it is partially a case of mixing formats and thinking that a high SR ODI batter is a high SR T20I batter too .... hence we are seeing Pandey, Dhawan, Jadhav Edited October 7, 2017 by express bowling rahulrulezz and Mosher 2 Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 13 minutes ago, sandeep said: Its not a question of knowledge. Its a question of the "regulars" in the team willingly giving up lucrative spots in the national T20 team. If a player gets clubbed as a less effective T20 player, its going to impact his IPL contract numbers big-time. If you are expecting the likes of Dhawan or Dhoni to volunteer such massive $$ sacrifices, or expecting that Kuptaan Kohli is going to be ruthlessly meritocratic instead of "taking care" of his buddies, then you should go talk to Anil Kumble. IPL is professional league, every team will drop anyone irrespective of reputation if players brings no value express bowling 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 1 hour ago, jf1gp_1 said: IPL is professional league, every team will drop anyone irrespective of reputation if players brings no value Yes, but presence in the national T20 team gives exposure and opportunities that the likes of Dhawan etc can use to audition themselves - if the likes of Shreyas Iyer, Samson get more chances at their expense, then they run the risk of being perceived as 'past-it' or fading players. Do you think the absence of Ash and Jaddu in ODI and T20 series is not going to have an impact on their auction valuations? Of course it will. Same goes for batsmen. beetle 1 Link to comment
Vilander Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 1 hour ago, express bowling said: It was a tongue-in-cheek statement .... I am not really implying a lack of knowledge regarding the need for high SR T20I batters. Manish Pandey and Kedar Jadhav are not stars but are there Ashwin and Jadeja have been dropped, despite being big names. To me, it is partially a case of mixing formats and thinking that a high SR ODI batter is a high SR T20I batter too .... hence we are seeing Pandey, Dhawan, Jadhav Ashwin Jadeja dropped since they are test regulars. Wonder if Dhawan and Dhoni who only have loi spots are becoming difficult to dislodge. Rahul must play. Link to comment
sandeep Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 4 minutes ago, Vilander said: Ashwin Jadeja dropped since they are test regulars. Wonder if Dhawan and Dhoni who only have loi spots are becoming difficult to dislodge. Rahul must play. Yes Bonda brother. Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, Vilander said: Ashwin Jadeja dropped since they are test regulars. Wonder if Dhawan and Dhoni who only have loi spots are becoming difficult to dislodge. Dhawan was dropped from our T20I team against England, earlier this year. His recent ODI form has most probably influenced his T20I selection. 3 minutes ago, Vilander said: Rahul must play. Absolutely. Link to comment
Adi_91 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 T20 is for the younger lot, fresh legs and a chance to try new, exciting talent. No wonder with this unnecessary too much emphasis on experience over fresh talent, our team's strike rates are lower. OpeningBatsman and raki05 2 Link to comment
raki05 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, express bowling said: Dhawan was dropped from our T20I team against England, earlier this year. His recent ODI form has most probably influenced his T20I selection. Absolutely. Why can't selector try all the youngsters and non regular in t20 rather than these overhyped bunch as other than wt20 who cares even if we loose few t20s while trying few new faces. In that way atleast we would be future ready and if history gives testimony for that as only time we won t20wc when the team was completly different from regular odi side. Adi_91, Vilander, Laaloo and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, raki05 said: Why can't selector try all the youngsters and non regular in t20 rather than these overhyped bunch as other than wt20 who cares even if we loose few t20s while trying few new faces. In that way atleast we would be future ready and if history gives testimony for that as only time we won t20wc when the team was completly different from regular odi side. These bilateral T20Is are ideal for trying Krunal, Pant, Iyer, Thampi etc. by rotation. Edited October 7, 2017 by express bowling raki05, sergio04, Mosher and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Vilander Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 18 minutes ago, sandeep said: Yes Bonda brother. Not sure what you mean by bonda but Rahul has 149 strikerate the guy is the nedt kohli. No point dropping him he is no Rahane in loi he is as good as he is in Tests ;) raki05 1 Link to comment
Nonbeliever Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Kl Rahul should be the first choice for opener. Looks like Kohli is not keen on sharing the limelight. raki05, beetle and wanted_desi 1 2 Link to comment
raki05 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 4 minutes ago, express bowling said: These bilateral T20Is are ideal for trying Krunal, Pant, Iyer, Thampi etc. by rotation. Absolutely.....otherwise what purpose ipl is serving other than providing monetery benifits to the individuals which is good. But just like domestic ranji,vijay and duleep series performance which is require for test and odi slection. Ipl performances should be given paramount importance for t20 selection. express bowling 1 Link to comment
raki05 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 4 minutes ago, Nonbeliever said: Kl Rahul should be the first choice for opener. Looks like Kohli is not keen on sharing the limelight. +1Somehow it gives me a sense(may be wrong)that everyone considering him a threat for their position. Including kuptan saheb and even budhha gavaskar, i think he is the person who can compete with kohli in all fomat provided better grooming and oopurtunities. Nonbeliever, OpeningBatsman and wanted_desi 3 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, raki05 said: Absolutely.....otherwise what purpose ipl is serving other than providing monetery benifits to the individuals which is good. But just like domestic ranji,vijay and duleep series performance which is require for test and odi slection. Ipl performances should be given paramount importance for t20 selection. Just look at the difference Kuldeep and Chahal have made to this side. Must try the same by introducing young batters. Edited October 7, 2017 by express bowling Adi_91, OpeningBatsman, raki05 and 1 other 4 Link to comment
OpeningBatsman Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) If you hv heard Virats post match comments, then dhawan is nt going anywhere anytime soon I'm a big fan of dhawan the Odi player but he's a poor t20 player. Out of the current squad Virat is the best equipped to open in t20 or Rahul could be tried. Need some fresh players in. Whats the use of IPL if we don't give chance to people who perform? Edited October 7, 2017 by OpeningBatsman Gollum, Mosher, raki05 and 4 others 7 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 15 minutes ago, OpeningBatsman said: If you hv heard Virats post match comments, then dhawan is nt going anywhere anytime soon I'm a big fan of dhawan the Odi player but he's a poor t20 player. Out of the current squad Virat is the best equipped to open in t20 or Rahul could be tried. Need some fresh players in. Whats the use of IPL if we don't give chance to people who perform? Something like Rohit Rahul Kohli Iyer Hardik Pant Krunal would be a T20I batting lineup rahulrulezz, Laaloo and OpeningBatsman 3 Link to comment
OpeningBatsman Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 6 minutes ago, express bowling said: Something like Rohit Rahul Kohli Iyer Hardik Pant Krunal would be a T20I batting lineup Yes, even though I don't rate Iyer much it's a good lineup, especially Pandya brothers at 6/7. I don't know where Nitish Rana disappeared to after the IPL, could have been a good prospect. express bowling 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, OpeningBatsman said: Yes, even though I don't rate Iyer much it's a good lineup, especially Pandya brothers at 6/7. I don't know where Nitish Rana disappeared to after the IPL, could have been a good prospect. Iyer is just an example ( as he had a SR of 139 @ an average of 34 last IPL and is doing well in A-team games nowadays ) and can easily be replaced by a better prospect if any. : ) Edited October 7, 2017 by express bowling OpeningBatsman 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now