rkt.india Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) 86.5 mph 88.5 mph 87.7 mph 88.4 mph 87.1 mph 86.1 mph More videos added 140KPH 140KPH 139KPH @Cricketics you had doubts about his pace. Now he is hitting 140K here too after coming back from a 4 months injury lay off. Uploaded more videos from challenger trophy. Edited November 28, 2017 by rkt.india tweaker, Cricketics and pindxb 1 2 Link to comment
chapetmarunga Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 he is too short & wayward Ridgepi 1 Link to comment
fineleg Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 over-hype going on man seriously! So many threads and no idea how these guys will do after few more years! Lets have a consolidated "upcoming pacers to keep an eye on" thread. They may just turn out to be over-hyped by ICF, you never know. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 These speed guns are not accurate. I can bet you. They are fast but not as much as they are showing the in the speed gun. That 87 mile one doesn’t look 87 at all. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 1 minute ago, MultiB48 said: if anything the speedometers look slow, it would be close to 90 in 2003 wc Lol 90 is fast and so is 87. This doesn’t look either of them. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 19 minutes ago, fineleg said: over-hype going on man seriously! So many threads and no idea how these guys will do after few more years! Lets have a consolidated "upcoming pacers to keep an eye on" thread. They may just turn out to be over-hyped by ICF, you never know. making threads about players is overhype. No one is saying they will become great bowlers or will be successful in the future. MCcricket, mishra, Mosher and 1 other 4 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 15 minutes ago, Cricketics said: These speed guns are not accurate. I can bet you. They are fast but not as much as they are showing the in the speed gun. That 87 mile one doesn’t look 87 at all. so, now people dont even believe speed gun readings. There is not one ball. Speed was consistent through out the game. listen to commentary in the original video. How they were impressed with his pace. mishra, Mosher and Rightarmfast 3 Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 This guy looks good.Far more than Porel ji. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: This guy looks good.Far more than Porel ji. Porel was making ****** out of first class batsmen. I bet you did not even watch the game. You can still watch the replay of second day where he took 4 wickets for 70 odd runs. Edited November 15, 2017 by rkt.india Link to comment
chapetmarunga Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 atm I would rank lalit > ishan > nagarkoti but potential wise I would say ishan > lalit > nagarkoti Link to comment
MCcricket Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 2 hours ago, rkt.india said: so, now people dont even believe speed gun readings. There is not one ball. Speed was consistent through out the game. listen to commentary in the original video. How they were impressed with his pace. Indians are that way Bhai, gora Hai to bas. I think Nagarkotti is serious talent he might become a Fast or Express bowler, very good action, rhythm, n pace thru air. What say Mulghanta Bhai n eye speed gun disbeliever comrade Cricketics. Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, Cricketics said: These speed guns are not accurate. I can bet you. They are fast but not as much as they are showing the in the speed gun. That 87 mile one doesn’t look 87 at all. Look at the videos below. Nagarkoti looks really sharp. I have seen him bowl in 3 full matches .... he is quick for his age. Edited November 15, 2017 by express bowling Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Ball by ball video ..... watch Nagarkoti bowl from 0.05.00 He is sharp Link to comment
Cricketics Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 34 minutes ago, express bowling said: Ball by ball video ..... watch Nagarkoti bowl from 0.05.00 He is sharP Not denying that he is fast and has potential. I just felt some of the balls were not as fast which showed on the speed gun. Especially the one outside off which batsman tried to reach and missed. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Just now, MultiB48 said: man if you can clock 82 he can clock 87 Lol he can clock even 90. Just talked about that particular ball in the video. Guy surely has potential. Link to comment
fineleg Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 again, why not have one single thread for "upcoming pacers" discussion? Link to comment
speedheat Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, fineleg said: again, why not have one single thread for "upcoming pacers" discussion? These are some new names in cricket, many here like me don't follow domestics that much, its better to have separate threads to avoids any sort of confusion Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 nagarkoti looks a talent for sure and he has pace..he is bowling 89 MPH at such a young age thats rare talent. is he faster than ishan too? Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 16, 2017 Author Share Posted November 16, 2017 9 hours ago, Shaz1 said: Looks slow to me. yeah video is not sped up like you guys do. Mosher, Rightarmfast and mishra 3 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 16, 2017 Author Share Posted November 16, 2017 11 hours ago, fineleg said: again, why not have one single thread for "upcoming pacers" discussion? why? every upcoming prospect deserves a thread. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now