maniac Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Who do you think has more of an upside to become a mainstay of their sides for years to come. Both are considered genuine allrounders and can bowl upto 140 clicks but still are batting allrounders. Marsh is still finding his feet at the highest level....Pandya too had a great start to his test career and has become a mainstay in LOI’s. Marsh had a good start in LOI’s but faltered a bit but finding his way back. who do you rate more? Edited December 4, 2017 by maniac Link to comment
maniac Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Marsh has a 5 wkt haul and a 100 in odis....has 2 test 50s and a 4 wkt haul but has been very poor in T20s. Pandya has a test 100, has played some match winning knocks in odis and has done well with the ball in odis. in T20s, Pandya has done better as well. Edited December 4, 2017 by maniac Link to comment
Nonbeliever Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Mitchell Marsh and comparison both are joke. How Marsh and Faulkner play international cricket is beyond me. LORD_analyst 1 Link to comment
velu Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 pandya got injured.. marsh is about to lose his test spot .. OP Yoda-esque 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now