sourab10forever Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 It's a small change but it can come in handy during close games and tight situation. Can avoid a few controversies. With the batsmen looking to fiddle around in the crease,it's tough for an on-field ump to call it within 3-4 secs. Decisions regarding last over No-balls that are near the waist height can prove to the difference between a win and a loss..given that it impacts not one but two balls(cause of the free hit that follows). Most teams won't review a wide/No-ball if it's not hugely impacting the result of the game. Thoughts? velu 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Yes. In fact all no-ball calls should be taken away from umpire and done by 3rd umpire. beetle 1 Link to comment
maniac Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Progressive thought of the day-why Not replace the concept of the umpire itself and replace it with technology....where human intervention is required for bad behavior etc, just use the match refree. Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Another 10 mins just to decide wides and no balls. Link to comment
prinzo Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 6 hours ago, Trichromatic said: Another 10 mins just to decide wides and no balls. Allow two reviews per team. Link to comment
sourab10forever Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 8 hours ago, Trichromatic said: Another 10 mins just to decide wides and no balls. Most Teams won't review unless it's a tight situation. They will save it a wicket related review. A review will hardly take 50 secs to 1 min. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now