sensible-indian Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) Kings lost by 3 runs. Had the wide in the last over been called, Kings would hav needed 2 runs from 1 ball. Standards of these indian umpires are woeful. I hav seen this particular umpire make a lot of mistakes in the past. Edit: since some are misinterpreting this post, let me clarify... Kings xi may well hav lost it even with wide but in a crucial moment, such things can make a huge impact. Edited May 20, 2018 by sensible-indian Garuda, Shunya, Zelig and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Cliff Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Didn't MI get a dodgy no ball called in their favor? Zelig, Garuda, Gollum and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 go easy on bambis .. they spent lots of money UrmiSinhaRay, Gollum, Zelig and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 4 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: Didn't MI get a dodgy no ball called in their favor? True. That should not have been a no ball on mcclenaghan. velu and Jimmy Cliff 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Nothing blatant. Axar moved before it was bowled. The ball passed under his bat as he missed the slog. Moreover from commentary feed Quote Close call for the umpire. Very wide yorker from McClenaghan which dips under Axar's slog-sweep, but because he had moved across the stumps a touch, the umpire decides to let it go sarcastic, upriser7, sourab10forever and 3 others 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamadagni Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) It depends. If the wide had been given, Mitch wouldn't gone easy with the last ball and KXIP might have need 4 or 5 off last ball and lost the game anyway. At the end of the day, Ashwin lost another match for his team with his dumb selections. Edited May 16, 2018 by Jamadagni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post beetle Posted May 16, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted May 16, 2018 Error...what error? Safed cheating hai....ab to bilkul blatant. Mi and csk can't digest food if they don't cheat. The Hound, LordPrabhzy, Jimmy Cliff and 7 others 1 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pollack Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, Jamadagni said: It depends. If the wide had been given, Mitch wouldn't gone easy with the last ball and KXIP might have need 4 or 5 off last ball and lost the game anyway. At the end of the day, Ashwin lost another match for his team with his dumb selections. No, Queens eleven were just not "Goodenough" velu 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowl_out Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Didn't see the no-ball... But that last over ball to Axar was clearly wide. Here's the commentary from cricinfo. "McClenaghan to Patel, 1 bye, wide yorker outside off. Very wide. He swings across the line and misses. Ishan Kishan fumbles and they sneak a bye. That should have been a wide..." Garuda 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shunya Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 This has been going on since 1st game. Its so normal for them, next year they are going to change the rules completely to accommodate all this. Garuda, Laaloo and velu 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maniac Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 You can't take the boundary of the last ball in equation...all Mitch was focusing on was not to bowl a noball and just bowl a legal delivery even if it was hit for a 6. That ball would have meant 7 out of 2...apart from that one fluke 6 by Axar,no way he was going to get 7 of 2,maybe only an outside chance...it wasn't such a difference maker in the end lol. What is this whining? sarcastic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pollack Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Meh....Whatever........ Laaloo, asterix, maniac and 2 others 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensible-indian Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 9 minutes ago, Number said: Nothing blatant. Axar moved before it was bowled. The ball passed under his bat as he missed the slog. Moreover from commentary feed Cricinfo feed says McClenaghan to Patel, 1 bye, wide yorker outside off. Very wide. He swings across the line and misses. Ishan Kishan fumbles and they sneak a bye. That should have been a wide... velu and Garuda 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, Shunya said: This has been going on since 1st game. Its so normal for them, next year they are going to change the rules completely to accommodate all this. And chuskis have been going on since 2008 raki05, asterix, adi B and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Number said: Nothing blatant. Axar moved before it was bowled. The ball passed under his bat as he missed the slog. Moreover from commentary feed neutral perspective Edited May 16, 2018 by velu Garuda 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Laaloo said: And chuskis have been going on since 2008 betting != fixing Garuda and Laaloo 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensible-indian Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 Its not about whining. Its about being fair. Game may have played out differently but blatant wrong call is wrong call. Apparently, calling out on chewtiyapa is whining. Lol. The Dark Horse 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, velu said: betting != fixing If you think chuskis only betted, then I don't know what to tell you.. Zelig 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scar Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Although I agree it was a wide but your assumption is flawed. They needed 8 of one, so even with the wide, the equation would have been 7 of one. maniac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Chuskis phir ro rahe hai Pollack, Zelig, velu and 2 others 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts