Jump to content
lamellavig

Scandinavian women are the most beautiful

Recommended Posts

As a university student in Norway, I can say this factually. Almost every woman here is a conventional 9/10. Absolutely smoking hot :aha:

 

Indian women are comparatively distantly non-competitive in the dating game and in terms of sexual market value

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Another desi paindu for whom fair skin = beauty.  

If you replaced Indian women's brown skin with fair skin, they still wouldn't be beautiful on average. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just came back from San Antonio road trip last week, mexican women are extremely beautiful. To visualize this, just take the prettiest women from Spain and India, fusion of these two will give you the beautiful Hispanic woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, beetle said:

If you were..

You wouldn't feel the need to convince strangers on a forum .

Looks like someone smiled and got you all excited to tell the world.

 

Good for you.

I am very popular with these hot blondes :p: however I always ensure that I do not be too nice. I am lucky with my looks so it is all about playing hard to get

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, lamellavig said:

Jealous?

 

Image result for swedish woman

Lol all it takes a visit to the local strip club to see half of female population of “Scandinavia” and that too without the effort of imagination.

 

Anyways have to give it to them though most of them are trying to be doctors,lawyers and economists and trying to save the world...don’t  let the thong and pasties fool us

Edited by maniac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, maniac said:

Lol all it takes a visit to the local strip club to see half of female population of “Scandinavia” and that too without the effort of imagination.

 

Anyways have to give it to them though most of them are trying to be doctors,lawyers and economists and trying to save the world...should let the thong and pasties fool us

 

hope your other half wont see posts like this of yours :phehe:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once u get a bit more confident and play the field a bit more, you may realize that real sexyness in a woman comes from her personality, not her looks. Ie, looks are necessary. But a plain girl with a killer personality & confidence is way sexier than a doll with zero on personality or confidence.

 

In adult relationships, long-lasting & real sexyness comes mostly from confidence. (Not overconfidence or arrogance, its a fine line). You will never get bored with that trait but after a while, even a Marilyn Monroe with a boring personality will bore you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

Once u get a bit more confident and play the field a bit more, you may realize that real sexyness in a woman comes from her personality, not her looks. Ie, looks are necessary. But a plain girl with a killer personality & confidence is way sexier than a doll with zero on personality or confidence.

 

In adult relationships, long-lasting & real sexyness comes mostly from confidence. (Not overconfidence or arrogance, its a fine line). You will never get bored with that trait but after a while, even a Marilyn Monroe with a boring personality will bore you.

I will never get bored. I don't actually need a relationship, I only need to enjoy sex. That's why I don't worry too much about personality. Looks are important for sex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, lamellavig said:

I will never get bored. I don't actually need a relationship, I only need to enjoy sex. That's why I don't worry too much about personality. Looks are important for sex.

this is you talking at what ? 19 ? 20 ? 21 ? 23 ?

Wait till you are 30. Then your view will change most likely.
You are in the 'getting my rocks off' stage. A stage where most western people go through in their teens and early 20s. Once u man up and grow up, you will most likely find you want a relationship. I was where you are at in my late teens and early 20s as well. Felt like on top of the world and only thing i needed from a girl was what her body had to offer. Then it gradually changed to a point where what she has to offer thats between her ears is 1000x more important than what she has to offer outside of it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sarcastic said:

Scandinavians are mostly German type..> tall, blonde, stout, broad shoulder, big face... And you call this beautiful...up to you! :p:

I think yes, it is a beauty.

At least it was considered beauty in the past. 

Even the Indian women in the past generations had wider faces as compared to today, and it was a real beauty. 

 

1502459370_madhubala.jpg

 

 

Edited by Alam_dar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

this is you talking at what ? 19 ? 20 ? 21 ? 23 ?

Wait till you are 30. Then your view will change most likely.
You are in the 'getting my rocks off' stage. A stage where most western people go through in their teens and early 20s. Once u man up and grow up, you will most likely find you want a relationship. I was where you are at in my late teens and early 20s as well. Felt like on top of the world and only thing i needed from a girl was what her body had to offer. Then it gradually changed to a point where what she has to offer thats between her ears is 1000x more important than what she has to offer outside of it.

  

For me, having a relationship is a waste of time. It represents a waste of your time, resources and money. any utility derived from such a relationship would be really long term if positive....and if negative, it more or less ruins general life. Same reason why I will never marry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, lamellavig said:

For me, having a relationship is a waste of time. It represents a waste of your time, resources and money. any utility derived from such a relationship would be really long term if positive....and if negative, it more or less ruins general life. Same reason why I will never marry. 

It may be you never marry. 

 

Nevertheless, I am sure you are going to loose interest in the intense sex, the way you have it at the moment. 

 

Actually, not only sex, any thing which becomes old, we start to loose our previous "intense" interest in it. Even the "intensity/extreme intensity" in the relationship is also going to be lost after some time ... At that time, the birth of the children brings "intense" happiness in the human life ... when children become adults, then again that intense relationship with them ends ... and perhaps at that time grandchildren brings again some what intense love in the life. 

 

If you are not going into a relationship due to the fear of breakage, then you may loose something of intense importance in your future life. 

 

 

 

Edited by Alam_dar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, lamellavig said:

For me, having a relationship is a waste of time. It represents a waste of your time, resources and money. any utility derived from such a relationship would be really long term if positive....and if negative, it more or less ruins general life. Same reason why I will never marry. 

As i said, all that you are saying, i've been there, done that and changed my mind as i got older.

there is an old saying that goes somewhat like 'if life was a beach, the footsteps in front of you are those of your elders- they have walked the path you are walking before you'.

 

Once you get out of your pupply love/sowing your wild oats phase, you will see what i mean. Till then, you won't. Its part of your growing up and its not done yet.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

I think yes, it is a beauty.

At least it was considered beauty in the past. 

Even the Indian women in the past generations had wider faces as compared to today, and it was a real beauty. 

 

1502459370_madhubala.jpg

 

 

Very few people in the past looked like that and very few people do so today.

Your food-nutter ideology does not support the fanciful notion that people's facial structure change inside a few generations. It changes only if there are new genetic inputs, in such a short period of time, meaning inter-marrying people. And because all indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and most Pashtuns are the same haplotype of humanity, it means such change occurs only when outsiders,like Arabs or English or Chinese, etc. intermarry with us. Which hasn't happened and is not happening in any large numbers.

 

Therefore your idea of 'wider faces in the past but not so today' is complete, 100% nonsense.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i spent some of my time in europe mostly in finland ( tampere ) , few weeks there in sweeden ( malmo & lund :p: ) and little time in france/germany..

 

IMHO this notion that scandanavians are good looking is highly overated . There are good looking and plain janes in every ethnicity and country . I went with some expectations that all women will be hot but boy i was disappointed.

 

 

And they are also as obese as us in my observation when roaming around townhalls.

 

I found french people ( including men ) and properly groomed ,  stylish and better looking than scandanavians.

My gujju manager told italains are even better and likable with chalta hain attitude.

 

We indians generally dont bother much about grooming , which makes many average looking and plain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Very few people in the past looked like that and very few people do so today.

False. 

Look at the wide faces of ladies in this photo.

 

madhubala-759.jpg

 

Wide face was a norm in older generations. While thin face is becoming norm in the younger generations. 

 

1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Your food-nutter ideology does not support the fanciful notion that people's facial structure change inside a few generations.

Again false. 

In the past centure, our diet has suddenly changed a lot. We have started using a lot of preservatives. We have started using lot of hormones and anitbiotics in the food. Thus the changes are also rapid, and we could easily feel the difference in the appearance of the older generations and the younger generations. 

 

Today we have Chocolate Heros, while in the past Heros were more manly. 

1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Therefore your idea of 'wider faces in the past but not so today' is complete, 100% nonsense.

I don't agree. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

False. 

Look at the wide faces of ladies in this photo.

You really need to stop your insane claims and get basic education in science. A photo of a dozen women from a movie DOES NOT represent a population of hundreds of millions.

 

21 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Wide face was a norm in older generations. While thin face is becoming norm in the younger generations. 

Scientific evidence of such a claim, please.

 

21 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Again false. 

In the past centure, our diet has suddenly changed a lot. We have started using a lot of preservatives. We have started using lot of hormones and anitbiotics in the food. Thus the changes are also rapid, and we could easily feel the difference in the appearance of the older generations and the younger generations. 

Scientific evidence that facial structure changes in a few generations due to food choices. Your religious nuttery is not proof.

 

21 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Today we have Chocolate Heros, while in the past Heros were more manly. 

I don't agree. 

 

Your agreement is irrelevant, as you have demonstrated that fad-food is your religion.

Evidence for your claims please.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, velu said:

i spent some of my time in europe mostly in finland ( tampere ) , few weeks there in sweeden ( malmo & lund :p: ) and little time in france/germany..

 

IMHO this notion that scandanavians are good looking is highly overated . There are good looking and plain janes in every ethnicity and country . I went with some expectations that all women will be hot but boy i was disappointed.

  

 

And they are also as obese as us in my observation when roaming around townhalls.

 

I found french people ( including men ) and properly groomed ,  stylish and better looking than scandanavians.

My gujju manager told italains are even better and likable with chalta hain attitude.

  

We indians generally dont bother much about grooming , which makes many average looking and plain.

Without a doubt, French are most groomed. And also, they are very fit ( may be workout or outdoor activity helps them or good food habits). France is not super cold like Scandinavia where ppl would have to remain indoors in good part of winter (similar to Canada). French women are the best looking within Europe IMO. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

False. 

Look at the wide faces of ladies in this photo.

 

madhubala-759.jpg

 

Wide face was a norm in older generations. While thin face is becoming norm in the younger generations. 

 

Again false. 

In the past centure, our diet has suddenly changed a lot. We have started using a lot of preservatives. We have started using lot of hormones and anitbiotics in the food. Thus the changes are also rapid, and we could easily feel the difference in the appearance of the older generations and the younger generations. 

 

Today we have Chocolate Heros, while in the past Heros were more manly. 

I don't agree. 

 

You're right in a way. Many things impact physical features. For example in the past the air was relatively pure (due to lower population and pollution), less stressful/sedentary life and better quality of food. All these things impact body chemistry which in turn impacts the physical appearance.

 

I have seen my grandfather's college graduation photo from 1945, and the students in the photo had much bigger frame than the average youth today, not even a single skinny person. Except for walking, working out/gym was unknown unless you were into pehelwani that time, and people had really heavy breakfast back then (including the poor), puri bhaji with lots of ghee, no skimmed milk/cornflakes/toasts and etc. modern breakfast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, panther said:

Scandinavia is ascended society because only the best genes are passed on, natural selection at work.

And what are the best genes in your definition?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, MechEng said:

Just came back from San Antonio road trip last week, mexican women are extremely beautiful. To visualize this, just take the prettiest women from Spain and India, fusion of these two will give you the beautiful Hispanic woman.

True dat...South Texas has muy caliente mamacitas esp when they moan Mi papi :giggle:...spend way too much $$ down in South padre during college days

Edited by Texy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

A photo of a dozen women from a movie DOES NOT represent a population of hundreds of millions.

You are making no sense as this one photo was only as an example, while whole movie is a proof that women of that era had wider face and bigger frame than today. 

Not only this one movie of Mughal e Azam, but there are thousands of old movies in Hindi, English and other languages and all showing that the older generation ladies had wider face in average and they had bigger body frames as compared to the average of present day. 

 

One has to be totally blind to not to see this simple fact. 

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

teri-mehfil-mein-hd-qawwali-madhubala-mu

 

mughal-e-azam-7591.jpg

5 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Scientific evidence of such a claim, please.

Use your eyes and brain. 

 

Prehistoric women were stronger than modern rowers, say Cambridge scientists

women-rowing.jpg

 

These Rowers are one of the healthiest and fittest women today. But even they are unable to match the strength of the normal women of the past. 

//

the research team got hold of ancient bones belonging to women from the early Neolithic period through to the Middle Ages.

They were compared with the bones of Cambridge University Women’s Boat Club members – elite athletes who spend 18 hours every week training and row an average of 120km a week.

Despite these women being in peak physical condition, they were still surpassed by ancient women in terms of arm strength.

In their study, published in the journal Science Advances, lead author Dr Alison Macintosh and her collaborators found that Neolithic women’s arm bones were up to 16 per cent stronger than the rowers’.

This was nearly 30 per cent stronger than the typical Cambridge students who were also analysed.//

 

5 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Your agreement is irrelevant, as you have demonstrated that fad-food is your religion.

You can keep on bringing personal insults instead of talking sensibly and with respect, but the Chocolate Heros of today is a reality, as compared to the manly Heroes of the past

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks doesn't matter. Nothing beats the libido of atheletic women. :Giggity:

Even looks will come along. Some of my friends were cute when little, but they can't run even a dog chases. They just formed extra fat everywhere once they croseed 20. Like broiler chicken. OTOH, one girl who isn't good looking during teens in the conventional sense turned into the most beautiful after 20. And she hardly grooms herself. Not just scandinavian, Any country that has physical work as part of their culture will have the most beautiful women. 

Edited by Detonator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MechEng said:

And what are the best genes in your definition?

Women decide that, feminist society means only desirable men pass on their genes, undesirables die childless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×