SecondSlip Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 Which batting allrounder will have a more successful international career? Link to comment
sandeep Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 Stop aping greenbros. Cricketics, Vilander, sandsaims and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 23, 2018 Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 2 hours ago, sandeep said: Stop aping greenbros. Talat is much better than all the uncapped Indian batsmen playing in the IPL. He’s so far ahead compared to the likes of Hooda, Rana, Rinku, Gill, Tripathi, Samson, Surya, Kishan, Krunal, Vohra, Mandeep, Sarfaraz, Agarwal and Shaw. UrmiSinhaRay, Suhaan, sam 25 and 1 other 1 1 2 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 6 hours ago, SecondSlip said: Talat is much better than all the uncapped Indian batsmen playing in the IPL. He’s so far ahead compared to the likes of Hooda, Rana, Rinku, Gill, Tripathi, Samson, Surya, Kishan, Krunal, Vohra, Mandeep, Sarfaraz, Agarwal and Shaw. dont know who this guy is but checked his stats and he has a T20 SR of 124 and FC average of 27. while the first Indian name you took Hooda who has a T20 SR of 141 and FC average of 50, Nitish Rana has a T20 SR of 135 and FC average of 46, Gill has a T20 SR of 145 and FC average of 61. He may be better than 20 year old Rinku Singh out of those names, but none else. Sgattick10, LORD_analyst, sandeep and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment
The Dark Horse Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 Please don't insult Shankar sandeep 1 Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 5 hours ago, rkt.india said: dont know who this guy is but checked his stats and he has a T20 SR of 124 and FC average of 27. while the first Indian name you took Hooda who has a T20 SR of 141 and FC average of 50, Nitish Rana has a T20 SR of 135 and FC average of 46, Gill has a T20 SR of 145 and FC average of 61. He may be better than 20 year old Rinku Singh out of those names, but none else. Compare their List A records Link to comment
rkt.india Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 31 minutes ago, SecondSlip said: Compare their List A records Hooda has an average of 42 at an SR of 97. He has average of 41 at an SR of 89. Link to comment
kira Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 lol comparing the elite Indian players with some phateechar from phateecharstan Who is this talat, never even heard of him, in any case he's bound to be inferior to even our domestic cricketers sandeep 1 Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Hooda has an average of 42 at an SR of 97. He has average of 41 at an SR of 89. Why are mentioning just Hooda? Compare with other uncapped batsmen such as Rana, Samson, Krunal etc. These guys are inferior batsmen to Talat Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 5 minutes ago, kira said: lol comparing the elite Indian players with some phateechar from phateecharstan Who is this talat, never even heard of him, in any case he's bound to be inferior to even our domestic cricketers When did these uncapped batsmen become elite? Link to comment
Khota Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 (edited) Both have not done anything special. Edited May 24, 2018 by Khota Link to comment
rkt.india Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 15 minutes ago, SecondSlip said: Why are mentioning just Hooda? Compare with other uncapped batsmen such as Rana, Samson, Krunal etc. These guys are inferior batsmen to Talat Talat is inferior to them in two formats, so who is actually inferior? They are better in two formats, so, Talat is inferior who is good only in one format. Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 37 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Talat is inferior to them in two formats, so who is actually inferior? They are better in two formats, so, Talat is inferior who is good only in one format. Talat is better in LOIs than the uncapped batsmen in the IPL. The likes of Surya, Tripathi, Kishan, Vohra etc. are behind. sandsaims 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 39 minutes ago, SecondSlip said: Talat is better in LOIs than the uncapped batsmen in the IPL. The likes of Surya, Tripathi, Kishan, Vohra etc. are behind. Talat isn't good enough with the bat to make a Konkan List A XI. Maybe that's a bit harsh - he might make the Konkan XI if a couple of the main guys are injured. Banjo the gulf in batting levels between India and Pakistan is bigger than the Grand canyon. domestic "stats" from Pakistani cricket are worthless. Using them to claim 'better' batting is nothing more than a demonstration of ignorance. sandsaims and express bowling 1 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 45 minutes ago, SecondSlip said: Talat is better in LOIs than the uncapped batsmen in the IPL. The likes of Surya, Tripathi, Kishan, Vohra etc. are behind. they all have better T20 stats than him so how are they behind him? Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 28 minutes ago, sandeep said: Talat isn't good enough with the bat to make a Konkan List A XI. Maybe that's a bit harsh - he might make the Konkan XI if a couple of the main guys are injured. Banjo the gulf in batting levels between India and Pakistan is bigger than the Grand canyon. domestic "stats" from Pakistani cricket are worthless. Using them to claim 'better' batting is nothing more than a demonstration of ignorance. The only one acting ignorant is you Sandeep Bhaiya. Have you ever seen him bat anyways? Anybody who has watched his batting and researched his domestic stats would rate him nicely. I’m not saying that he would make it to the Indian team but there is no way that he is inferior to the likes of Rahane, Pandey, Iyer and Rayudu. Talat has much more potential as a #4 batsman compared to the options that Team India has been using in the past few years! UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 28 minutes ago, rkt.india said: they all have better T20 stats than him so how are they behind him? Talat averages 38 with a strike rate of 125. That is better than basically every uncapped Indian that I mentioned above. Where are you getting your stats from? Because even cricbuzz is showing that Hooda and Agarwal average 15 and 16 in the IPL respectively. Link to comment
SecondSlip Posted May 24, 2018 Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 @rkt.india if strike rate was everything, then K. Gowtham is the greatest player in IPL 2018 Link to comment
Vilander Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 14 minutes ago, SecondSlip said: that he is inferior to the likes of Rahane, Pandey, Iyer and Rayudu. lol in t20 you mean ? even then Rayudu this season in t20 has been some other level Link to comment
Gollum Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 (edited) Watch a lot of cricket, follow every team but never heard of this Talat guy. But Shankar is very mediocre, don't see why we are persisting with him. Edited May 24, 2018 by Gollum UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now