India vs England: Krunal Pandya Inches Closer to Dream of Playing 2019 World Cup Alongside Brother Hardik

[The Unrealist]

Quote

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/news/india-vs-england-krunal-pandya-inches-closer-to-dream-of-playing-2019-world-cup-alongside-brother-hardik-1798579.html

In June 2017, when Krunal Pandya was picked for the India A squad for a limited-overs series in South Africa, he identified the moment as the first pit stop of the journey he had set himself on. 

"The aim is not just to represent India for a couple of matches here and there but to play for as long as possible,” he said. “It would be a dream come true if I and Hardik can together play for India in the 2019 World Cup.”

A year later, the 27-year-old is a step closer to fulfilling that dream, although his maiden India call up has come from the backdoor. Washington Sundar injured himself while playing football in team practice and the selectors turned immediately to the older Pandya brother as replacement. In fact, Pandya was already in England as part of the India A squad that reached the final of the tri-series in England featuring West Indies A and England Lions.
The Baroda all-rounder’s stock has risen considerably over the last couple of years and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. At the IPL auction earlier this year, the Mumbai Indians used their 'Right to Match' card to ensure he stayed in the camp for a cool price tag of 8.8 crore rupees. Though the franchise had an underwhelming tournament, failing to defend their title, he was one of their standout performers - ending the season with 228 runs at a strike rate of 145.22 and 12 wickets with an economy rate of 7.07 runs per over.

However, it was his output during the 2017 edition which thrust his name to the list of contenders for an India call-up. Pandya finished that season with 243 runs at a strike rate of 135.75 and 10 wickets at an impressive economy of 6.82. Notably, he was man of the match in a low scoring final against Rising Pune Supergiant. Batting first, Mumbai made just 129 with Pandya top scoring with 47 in 38 balls. He took the new ball, and bowled his four overs for 31. 

Pandya possess the ideal skill set for a limited overs player - a crafty left-arm spinner, hard hitting middle-order batsman (that he is left-handed is a plus) and an exceptional ground fielder. India’s T20 side is yet to settle on a sixth bowling option and Pandya might just be the answer. Including the southpaw in the playing XI may bolster the bowling as well as provide India with lower order muscle at the end of an innings. 

And as for the dream of returning to England as a member of the same squad as his kid brother, well, that is closer today than ever before.

 

[Moochad]

I want to see them both Pandyas get chances together. They can solve our power hitting issue

[Clarke]

Imad Wasim kinda player, bits & pieces all rounder. Hope we can do better than that.

[Clarke]

1 hour ago, Moochad said:

I want to see them both Pandyas get chances together. They can solve our power hitting issue

With two good wristies doing their job, is he good enough to hold his spot as a batsman aka Yuvi of past ?

 

Why not have a proper batsman instead who's capable of slog besides building an inning. 

[Moochad]

25 minutes ago, Clarke said:

With two good wristies doing their job, is he good enough to hold his spot as a batsman aka Yuvi of past ?

 

Why not have a proper batsman instead who's capable of slog besides building an inning. 

I'm not sure if we have a good enough batsman for that

I am thinking

Rohit

Dhawan

Kohli

Rahul

Krunal

Dhoni

Hardik

Bhuvi

Kuldeep

Chahal

Bumrah

 

Pandey is good batsman so far in ODI but his range of strokes are limited and he can't slog very well I don't think he can bat below 4.  DK is good as a finisher but from his history he can't play a long innings. 

 

Krunal gives good finishing power and a 6th bowling option. 

Edited July 3, 2018 by Moochad

[rkt.india]

25 minutes ago, Clarke said:

With two good wristies doing their job, is he good enough to hold his spot as a batsman aka Yuvi of past ?

 

Why not have a proper batsman instead who's capable of slog besides building an inning. 

he is a proper batsman who can bowl. you do need a sixth bowling option anyway.

[rkt.india]

2 minutes ago, Moochad said:

I'm not sure if we have a good enough batsman for that

I am thinking

Rohit

Dhawan

Kohli

Rahul

Krunal

Dhoni

Hardik

Bhuvi

Kuldeep

Chahal

Bumrah

 

Pandey is good batsman so far in ODI but his range of strokes are limited and he can't slog very well I don't think he can bat below 4.  DK is good as a finisher but from his history he can't play a long innings. 

 

Krunal gives good finishing power and a 6th bowling option. 

ideal T20 XI

[Laaloo]

Let's see how good he is. Certainly a better bat than jaddu and axar. Not sure about bowling. 

[raki05]

21 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Let's see how good he is. Certainly a better bat than jaddu and axar. Not sure about bowling. 

Any left armer is better than axar. It doesn't matter whether he is footballer/golfer/ table tennis player or someone who doesn't even have left hand.

[sandeep]

20 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Let's see how good he is. Certainly a better bat than jaddu and axar. Not sure about bowling. 

He's almost a true inverse of Axar - better batsman, but worse bowler.  From what little I have seen of him, his batting still has a few question marks on it.  Axar is comfortably a better bowler than him though, by a distance.  

 

Sometimes players who aren't quite good enough manage to get national debuts and even decent careers because their skillset fits a role that a good team needs, and they can afford to carry them.  Krunal fits that description to a T.

 

As a batsman, I think there are easily 5-8 others who are better options than him.  But at #7, if he can keep improving his bowling and batting a bit?  He can be that last piece of a jigsaw puzzle that completes a WC winning team.  Think Andy Bichel in 2003.

[Moochad]

1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

ideal T20 XI

How would you change it for ODIs?