Jump to content

With Saha in doubt, Pant must play England


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sachinism said:

Inexperienced. Smashing a few sixes in IPL shouldn't move you ahead of more established cricketers. Picking a player because he could smash a quick 100 is ridiculous.

As pointed out above KKD has been instrumental in a test win in England. Definitely deserves first dibs.

Karthik is 33 years old. How long can he do this? Moreover, Pant averages over 50 in FC cricket and certainly has better glove work than present Karthik.  In 2007, Karthik played as a batsman.  Here, we are looking for a wicket keeper and Pant is ahead in pure wicket keeping skills.  Karthik can for sure take blinders but he also can drop dollies. Yes, for sure, i too in favor Karthik ahead of Pant atm as he has played there before but back keeper should be Pant and not Parthiv Patel.  Selectors made this same mistake before too when we played at home against England and Saha got injured, they brought in PP who dropped regulation catches and then he again replaced Saha is SA and cost us a test match with his drops. 

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Sachinism said:

Inexperienced. Smashing a few sixes in IPL shouldn't move you ahead of more established cricketers. Picking a player because he could smash a quick 100 is ridiculous.

As pointed out above KKD has been instrumental in a test win in England. Definitely deserves first dibs.

Karthik is for sure a better slogger than Pant, but Pant is the better batsman. Pant is also the better wicketkeeper. No logic to your claims whatsoever!

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Sachinism said:

Inexperienced. Smashing a few sixes in IPL shouldn't move you ahead of more established cricketers. Picking a player because he could smash a quick 100 is ridiculous.

As pointed out above KKD has been instrumental in a test win in England. Definitely deserves first dibs.

Since when is dk an established cricketer? 13 years since his debut and he's not established yet. We do not want just because he smashed a 'few' sixes. We want him because he's the next best option next to Saha. 

Edited by Laaloo
Link to comment

Would definitely miss Saha for his work behind the stumps, if you compare battingwise DK is a safer bet than Saha imo in overseas.
If Pant was in selectors radar the signs would've been shown already. He's hasnt featured in t20s since March, so its either between DK & PP. Wont mind young Pant as a backup for DK rather than Mr.Pappu who's a complete disaster.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Sachinism said:

Inexperienced. Smashing a few sixes in IPL shouldn't move you ahead of more established cricketers. Picking a player because he could smash a quick 100 is ridiculous.

As pointed out above KKD has been instrumental in a test win in England. Definitely deserves first dibs.

No mention of actual job - wicket-keeping?

 

 

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, UnknownGenius said:

N jagadeesan should be the one nurtured besides pant. Average close to 45, safe as a house behind the stumps and has that winning mentality having recently been part of a team that lifted a major trophy

 

Even Pant wanted that experience as can be seen in post torunament celebrations and pics

Massive troll

Edited by lamellavig
Link to comment
55 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Seems like those advocating for dk because he hit a few half centuries 11 years ago would also have no problem if we recall rp Singh again. Rp Singh did have more success than dk did right? 

Spot on , I will be massively disappointed if DK plays test matches as a first choice.DK had his time, now he needs to be backup to Pant or Ishan. This selection committee talks big game but has not done anything to prove it.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...