Three Selectors Who have 13 tests between them decide the future of India

[Malcolm Merlyn]

The indian selection committee as of now had 3 members. MSK Prasad,Sarandeep Singh and Devang Gandhi. Jatin Paranjape and Gagan Khoda are in suspension as according to the CoA they are not test cricketers so cannot be in selection committee.

 

Now the 3 Indian selectors have played 13 tests between them.

 

In comparision Pakistan selection committee is led by Inzy who has played 100 plus tests. It also has Tauseef Ahmed(34 tests) Wajahtullah Wasti(6 tests and 15 ODIs) and Waseem Haider who has 3 Odis.

 

Cricket Australia selection panel has the likes of Mark Waugh and Greg Chappell.

 

NZC has Gavin Larson as selector who has 100 plus ODIs.

 

The indian selection committee looks like a group of yes boys picked from obscurity just to be a rubber stamp. These guys are failures. Their selections pretty much show their ability.

 

Is this how Indian cricket function?

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

 

[tweaker]

As Amaranth had said

 

Bunch of jokers

[Switchblade]

I mentioned that in one of the threads that these guys have 0 credibility or stature.They are happy to collect their money and are nothing more than a yes man type.

[SK_IH]

look at those names, horrific memories of 90s come back 

[Malcolm Merlyn]

Total buffoons are selectors. On top of this the bcci is asking the SC to relax the norms from test cricketers only to FC cricketers.

No one who hasnot playe 25tests or 50 Odis for India deserves to be a selector.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[raki05]

How can they be selectors, when they themselves got hardly selected.

[Trichromatic]

They should impose criteria of min 30 tests or 100 ODIs.

[Malcolm Merlyn]

Shardul Thakur backed by mumbai and csk lobby. Isko kaun drop karega re....

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Switchblade]

1 minute ago, Malcolm Merlyn said:

Shardul Thakur backed by mumbai and csk lobby. Isko kaun drop karega re....

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Bilkul Mumbai lobby and Csk quota ordinary player yet he keeps getting selected.

[Khota]

I think you have this wrong. Even I can be a good selector but the problem is not their experience but decision making. BCCI really needs to invest in Analytics like baseball. That will yield enough data to pick the right players for right conditions and opposition. These decisions could easily be computer/data based.

[Khota]

28 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

They should impose criteria of min 30 tests or 100 ODIs.

No. See my response above.

[gattaca]

Similar to coaching a player who played more tests doesn’t mean they will do better in selection. They should be involved at domestic level. Also imagine how many will be left since we are having different set of selectors every time. Top guys like  Dravid and ganguly have different positions with Indian cricket. Selection is a thankless job you will only get ok players. 

[Global.Baba]

Selectors are weak but at the same time,in the last few years they have selected a lot of youngsters as well. How can you blame them if the team management has not given the players a shot?

 

for every DK,Parthiv,Yuvraj they have also selected Pant,Siraj,Shankar,Sundar,Kuldeep,Chahal,Nair,Krunal Pandya etc. most of them who were identified as players with potential.Now if these players are not being given the confidence then how can you blame the selectors?