Jump to content

Why are Indian Fast Bowlers "timid batsmen" ?


Recommended Posts

If you look around the world teams, the fast bowlers can tonk the bowl & bat really well at times, for e.g. broad, russell, holder, faheem, hasan ali, plunkett, southee, anderson, starc, johnson, even malinga could give it a stick. It's just that after Srinath, i've not seen an indian bowler who had the skills to tonk the ball. Agarkar had the skills only in domestic not in international cricket. e.g. Ishant, bhuvi, bumrah, kaul.   Pandya is more of a batsmen who can bowl so not counted in this list of pure bowlers.

 

Even in the upcoming one's apart from Shardul Thakur no-one has the body language to be aggressive & hold the bat. 

 

I believe there has something to do with the coaching, that these bowlers are not groomed to use improve the batting skills.

 

Thoughts?

 

Upcoming bowlers like Mavi / Nagarkoti have some promise but the wider group is pretty disappointing.

Link to comment

BK looks like a decent test bowling-allrounder, at least at times. Shami and Umesh are sloggers. Ishant is a blocker. Bumrah is a proper tail-ender.

 

The only one who looks timid ever is Bumrah, but he has only just started his test career, so he will get better. 

 

A real timid Indian bowler with the bat was Zak. Sometimes it seemed he would just throw his wicket away by mindless slogging, just so he wouldn't have to be on the pitch any longer.

Link to comment

The indian spinners are more aggressive when it comes to batting than the fast bowlers,like harbhajan, jadeja, ashwin, patel  all can bat & can be dominating too & the fast bowlers can only slog or be timid, they can't dominate. 

 

This needs to change if we want to be a better all round team. every one in the team needs to bat & be dominating when required.

Link to comment

Not wise to put pressure of runs on specialist bowlers. Didn't they do their job well in SA. Let them concentrate on bowling. That is what they must be accountable for.

 

Bhuvi is one of the best batsman amongst specialist bowlers. Even performs as good as specialist batsmen of some teams in tough conditions for batting.

 

 

Edited by Straight Drive
Link to comment
Shami and Umesh are not timid at all. Ishant blocks a lot and bowler has to take wicket. Bhuv is certain conditions is actually as assured as Ashwin so borderline allrounder. 

Bhuvi can't take on fast bowling, he can hold his bat against spinners though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, nsareen said:


Bhuvi can't take on fast bowling, he can hold his bat against spinners though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you watch his three fifty's versus England test series in England. And the ODI Knock he played with Dhoni at other end. Ashwin and Bhuvi are the best batsmen amongst bowlers of all teams. Maybe only Philander comes close to those two. 

Edited by Straight Drive
Link to comment
Did you watch his three fifty's versus England test series in England. And the ODI Knock he played with Dhoni at other end.

 

I've but when I say take on fast bowling I meant dominate fast bowlers, hit them for boundaries when they feel to, even sixes, I've not seen bhivi hit sixes to fast bowler, how would you compare bhivi with the likes of Johnson or broad or Holder or Braithwaite or faheem ashraf the new guy, or even pat cummins or starc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
1 hour ago, nsareen said:

 

I've but when I say take on fast bowling I meant dominate fast bowlers, hit them for boundaries when they feel to, even sixes, I've not seen bhivi hit sixes to fast bowler, how would you compare bhivi with the likes of Johnson or broad or Holder or Braithwaite or faheem ashraf the new guy, or even pat cummins or starc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In tests there is no need to take on bowlers. Bhuvi and Ashwin have test batting average of 22 and 30 respectively which is very good from bowlers at international level. Even though batting SR of bowlers do not matter in tests, Bhuvi and Ashwin have batting SR of 45 and 54 respectively which is very good for a bowler. SR of 54 means that when Ashwin wants he can score higher than that as that is only an average SR. In some innings he can bat at SR over 100 like he does in few ODI and T20 innings. His ODI SR is 85 so it's not like he can't score run a ball in some innings.

 

I think no other team has two bowlers with this batting average.

 

Faheem and  Brathwaite has just started test career. Even Holder has not played half the tests as Ashwin. Moreover they are not specialist bowlers to compare with Bhuvi or Ashwin.

 

If one wants to compare Faheem Ashraf, Brathwaite or Holder then a like for like all rounder comparison with someone from Indian team would be all rounder Hardik Pandya, not Ashwin or Bhuvi.

 

Would you name any cricketer whose specialist skill is bowling in tests but has better test batting average than Ashwin or for that matter even Bhuvi. Would be even better if you post their test batting averages in comparison.

 

Player  with bowling as primary skill - Test batting AVG

 

Ashwin - 30

Philander  - 25

Starc -  22

Bhuvi - 22

Cummins - 20

 

 

We have one bowler who has best test batting average amongst all specialist bowlers. Bhuvi with batting average of 22 is also someone with good batting average. So we have the top 2 batsmen in bowling departments. Even Aussie pair of Starc and Cummins are second to our two bowlers.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Straight Drive
Link to comment
10 hours ago, nsareen said:

 

I've but when I say take on fast bowling I meant dominate fast bowlers, hit them for boundaries when they feel to, even sixes, I've not seen bhivi hit sixes to fast bowler, how would you compare bhivi with the likes of Johnson or broad or Holder or Braithwaite or faheem ashraf the new guy, or even pat cummins or starc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

in tests preservation of wicket is most important after that scoing runs. Bhuv can do both.

Link to comment

In tests, bhuvi can be considered a bowling allrounder .

 

In Lois , he does not have the fire power to hit out that is required at the end. At best he can be expected to rotate strike and get the big hitter on strike.

If early wkts fall down cheaply in odi's , then they should try sending bhuvi ahead of Pandya to try and steady the innings and save Pandya for the big hitting later on.

 

In T20...bhuvi is pretty useless with the bat.

Link to comment

Having said that we have two best batsman amongst bowlers in tests (Bhuvi and Ashwin), we will miss batting of both of them this test series against England. Bhuvi is injured and Ashwin might not make playing 11 of few tests. In a way it is good.   It makes the specialist batsmen accountable for runs. Think the absence of lower order runs from Bhuvi and Ashwin will put the specialist batters in their right place.They have masked the batting issues overseas to some extent due to their contribution with bat.

Edited by Straight Drive
Link to comment
12 hours ago, UnknownGenius said:

Deepak Chahar

Shardul Thakur

KM Asif

 

Can all bat and bowl. Can hit down the order. Ok not sure of Asif but other two are proven match winners with bowl and bat and won the most recent major trophy

Thakur played the decider but did nothing apart from one wicket went for plenty the winning mentality was missing :hmm:.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...