Jump to content

Say sorry to Saha


Gollum

Recommended Posts

Just now, R.D forever said:

Ppl who start threads based on one innings should be banned. Ffs give that man a chance for at least 2 tests. 

Well Saha was chastised on this forum based on 1 test in Cape Town, didn't see you complaining then? And DK isn't a debutant, he has been a test failure for the last 13 years. Had Pant failed here no one would have complained. 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

No Saha was never a long term option. India needs a solid batsman as a keeper. Both KKD/Saha are not our solutions for different reasons. India has to move on with someone line Pant. If they intend to play Pandya as 5th bowler India needs a stronger keeper. In this match one catch that KKD dropped cost probably 5 runs. That's it. There is no real different Saha would have made here anyway.

DK dropped 2 catches.

Link to comment

Karthik takes 1 blinder and drops 5 sitters. I have been through that torture in the 2008 M&M series (Sri Lanka), he was a complete wreck. Must have missed 15 chances in that series alone. He has always been a rubbish keeper, not as pathetic as Pappu but not worthy of international cricket. 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Come on guys. stop hyping Saha is like Gilchrist/Sanga/Boucher/McCullum rolled in to one lol  Are you telling me Saha never dropped any catch or missed any stumping?

Sanga, Gilly, Flower, Baz-> one type

 

Healy, Boucher, Latif, Saha-> another type

 

Don't make up stuff, no one said he is a combination of all of them. Everybody drops catches just like every batsman fails and every bowler sucks balls....no one is perfect. Healy cost Aus a series in Pak with a simple stumping miss, but he made up for that in the rest of his career. Saha isn't God but he is one of the safest pure keepers of all time. 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Gollum said:

Sanga, Gilly, Flower, Baz-> one type

 

Healy, Boucher, Latif, Saha-> another type

 

Don't make up stuff, no one said he is a combination of all of them. Everybody drops catches just like every batsman fails and every bowler sucks balls....no one is perfect. Healy cost Aus a series in Pak with a simple stumping miss, but he made up for that in the rest of his career. Saha isn't God but he is one of the safest pure keepers of all time. 

Bottomline is everybody is susceptible.  We have to weigh all the options and see who could be more useful as a sum. Saha probably has a couple of years left in him assuming he is immediately coming back. At 35 we wanted even Dhoni out. 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Sanga, Gilly, Flower, Baz-> one type

 

Healy, Boucher, Latif, Saha-> another type

 

Don't make up stuff, no one said he is a combination of all of them. Everybody drops catches just like every batsman fails and every bowler sucks balls....no one is perfect. Healy cost Aus a series in Pak with a simple stumping miss, but he made up for that in the rest of his career. Saha isn't God but he is one of the safest pure keepers of all time. 

Gollum not questioning his wk skills but do you really think he can score overseas he failed in Australia and even of he played in South Africa he would have failed there he isn’t a game changer with the bat.In India things fall in place so lots of them score runs but they fail overseas.

Link to comment
Gollum not questioning his wk skills but do you really think he can score overseas he failed in Australia and even of he played in South Africa he would have failed there he isn’t a game changer with the bat.In India things fall in place so lots of them score runs but they fail overseas.
I think you don't get it.Wk in test cricket is most important.In history of test cricket except Gilchrist and gilly had a strong batting lineup You will not find many wk avg above 40.
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, CG said:
11 minutes ago, Switchblade said:
Gollum not questioning his wk skills but do you really think he can score overseas he failed in Australia and even of he played in South Africa he would have failed there he isn’t a game changer with the bat.In India things fall in place so lots of them score runs but they fail overseas.

I think you don't get it.Wk in test cricket is most important.In history of test cricket except Gilchrist and gilly had a strong batting lineup You will not find many wk avg above 40.

I get that CG but he needs to contribute with the bat as well not saying he should score centuries but should make vital contributions with the bat as well.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...