Jump to content
Ankit_sharma03

Whats this agenda that India Today is running against Pandya?

Recommended Posts

Pandya needs to master one of the art.Simple, consistently,its neither that he is performing worst nor are the other specialist bats setting world on fire..when your top six are batting like number 11s ,its way rude to accept pandya deliver in every match atleast with the bat when our specialist are failing ..but it remains to be seen that pandya does well in one of the departments

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Khota said:

What is your agenda? Why do you keep on supporing him? 

No agenda, i think he is a terrific cricketer n i beilve in him so i back him, even rahul ( so even if he fails whole tour ill back him

I dnt say u hve an agenda when u back dhawan n karthik from whom pandya has done better. We all have diff opinions

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Turning_track said:

Really? When did that happen? Irrespective of Pandya's performances, that dolt often keeps choicest of words for him in the studio.

their is something - even ganguly  scolded Vikrant gupta by telling him- ur to harsh on pandya , i knw why ....ill talk to u when i meet u 

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Khota said:

What is your agenda? Why do you keep on supporing him? 

Having said that at least Pandya is giving it all. Others are not.

 

7 hours ago, shortbread said:

There's no agenda. If one is a die-hard fan then everything will look like a conspiracy theory! To others it's shocking the guy is playing in the side.

 

Imagine if u see Stuart Binny playing in this team, he scores 10-20 runs every odd innings, a handful of docile overs, few lucky wickets.....u couldn't bear to watch it. One would think how is he even in the side?

 

It's the same feeling, only this time the guy is thinner, has 'swag' and wears jewellery. If there's a campaign to see him off the test team, I'd join in as well!

 

DO u guys read the post before saying anything , even ganguly has said this to him on live show

U think ganguly is a fool 

 

9 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

I remeber when ganguly was with Aaj tak he scolded Vikrant gupta by telling him- ur to harsh on pandya , i knw why ....ill talk to u when i meet u 

 

 

 

U think its only me but after boria n his tweets.....everyone noticed this . The only person who is being blind thats u 

 

 

 

cF3ZQNU.png

 

OHpq0SS.png

XsPkLHZ.png

 

 

 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

No agenda, i think he is a terrific cricketer n i beilve in him so i back him, even rahul ( so even if he fails whole tour ill back him

I dnt say u hve an agenda when u back dhawan n karthik from whom pandya has done better. We all have diff opinions

 

 

I back both Dhawan and karthick but there is a limit. If karthick fails in test 3 he needs to sit out. Enough is enough.

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Khota said:

I back both Dhawan and karthick but there is a limit. If karthick fails in test 3 he needs to sit out. Enough is enough.

backing cnt be so short 

Look at the way ganguly n dhoni has backed player and results

Look at the kohli kohli backs a player(pretty much ur way) and results- insecurity 

Share this post


Link to post
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

backing cnt be so short 

Look at the way ganguly n dhoni has backed player and results

Look at the kohli kohli backs a player(pretty much ur way) and results- insecurity 

Backing cannot be indefinite either. Two test is the max and they are professionals and they will understand.

Share this post


Link to post

Asking to drop someone who has done almost nothing is not an agenda. It can be because their experts feel we need an extra batsman. You could have termed it as agenda if Pandya had done really well and even then there were calls to drop him. 

Share this post


Link to post
24 minutes ago, Number said:

Asking to drop someone who has done almost nothing is not an agenda. It can be because their experts feel we need an extra batsman. You could have termed it as agenda if Pandya had done really well and even then there were calls to drop him. 

Padnya was our second best bowler at Lords, even in batting was better than most batsman.  Why not first drop Vijay, Rahane then who failed miserably in both tests.   I dont see anyone talking about as vigorously as they are talking about Pandya. what extra batsman yaar, Pandya is your extra batsman.  Just because he can bowl, people have term he isnt a batsman. He is making more runs than the main batsman.

Share this post


Link to post
56 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Padnya was our second best bowler at Lords, even in batting was better than most batsman.  Why not first drop Vijay, Rahane then who failed miserably in both tests.   I dont see anyone talking about as vigorously as they are talking about Pandya. what extra batsman yaar, Pandya is your extra batsman.  Just because he can bowl, people have term he isnt a batsman. He is making more runs than the main batsman.

Vijay and Rahane have done well in the past. Can't drop them as yet but if they don't score runs there will be calls to drop them too. Like these people have been asking to drop Vijay next game. 

And seriously, whatever runs he is making are not good enough to keep him in the team as no. 6 batsman. No. 6 batsman is expected to score at least 50+ in one of the 4 innings. The argument that he is second best, third best is not going to work because the other batsmen have been utter failures and will be changed.

 I am not saying we should drop Pandya right now. But I don't see it as an agenda if someone questions his place.

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Number said:

Asking to drop someone who has done almost nothing is not an agenda. It can be because their experts feel we need an extra batsman. You could have termed it as agenda if Pandya had done really well and even then there were calls to drop him. 

Did i say holding n other ex cricketers who has asked question of his place having an agenda??? No na 

IF i have pointed it particularly their wud be a reason, read the post ....read ganguly comment their.....read comments on twitter where ppl have started questioning it 

 

Share this post


Link to post
On 8/14/2018 at 3:42 PM, swastikpanda2 said:

Stokes in the first test of India-England series in India scored a hundred in the first innings and took a fifer in the 3rd test of that series. He was their best pacer along with broad I think.

Stokes was one of their best players in that test series.

Woakes was very poor in that test series.

 

In Odis, Stokes wasn't good with ball (remember those were high scoring matches) but contributed well with the bat and Woakes was the best new ball bowler in the Odi series who also won the 3rd Odi with his batting.

 

Ben stokes even bagged a very high Ipl contract in 2017 because of his all round performance in India.

That's the key word "their" .

he had average stats in that series overall but was good for England because they were poor as a team themselves,similar to pandya in the present series .he might not be having good numbers with both bat and ball but comfortably one of the decent performers from "our" (that's the key point) side .

stokes took just 8 wkts at 45 which is below average performance and scored at an average of 38 which is also average given the flat nature of pitches during that series 

Share this post


Link to post

Didn't Jeff Thomson say about Aussie all-rounder Shane Watson that " he was not even an all-rounders arsehole"..

Wonder what he would say about pandya?

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Man this Vikrant Gupta is so hateful against Pandya. He is blasting him now as if he is the only person responsible for loss. Agreed Pandya played bad, but he is not the main reason for defeat.

When these people get after someone so bad, they lose their credibility.

Now every time they criticize someone, people will wonder if it is real criticism or some personal agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
5 hours ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Man this Vikrant Gupta is so hateful against Pandya. He is blasting him now as if he is the only person responsible for loss. Agreed Pandya played bad, but he is not the main reason for defeat.

He was the biggest reason we lost. 85 runs for a wicket and scored 4 runs.

And if you look at the context, he bowled at the tail in the second innings and came in to bat both the times when the ball was old. He should have scored.

 

Share this post


Link to post

As i said their is an agenda

 

Look how his answer has been turned

 

HE humbly says - Sir M not kapil dev, dnt compare me with him he was gr8 in his era.....let me be myself

 

Nothing wrong with he said, he knws where he stands 

 

 

N how these ppl make it sound like 

as if he has said - i dnt want to be kapil , m pandya which is better 

Which he never meant 

 

Disgusting 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

yeah ,they always manage to put pandya's name before others ,check this headline after Southampton test  --gavaskar wants pandya and a few more players dropped from team lol

 

yup this was other one, why not also take others name both them n gavaskar

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×