Lala Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 He more economical bowler than wicket taker. Indian wale kulasekara who bowls lot of slow inswingers to get lbw or bowled UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 In the last 3 years, Bhuvi has the highest average ( 44.8 ) among all ODI pacers who have taken 30+ wickets. This is poor performance. ( 3 years is the usual period used for ICC rankings ) Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5 Hasan Ali (PAK) 2016-2018 33 33 272.1 11 1420 68 5/34 20.88 5.21 24.0 1 3 JJ Bumrah (INDIA) 2016-2018 37 37 309.5 19 1440 64 5/27 22.50 4.64 29.0 3 1 MJ Henry (NZ) 2015-2018 19 18 161.0 8 884 39 5/40 22.66 5.49 24.7 3 1 MA Starc (AUS) 2016-2018 26 26 234.3 12 1185 51 4/29 23.23 5.05 27.5 3 0 Mustafizur Rahman (BDESH) 2015-2018 24 23 184.2 9 894 38 5/34 23.52 4.84 29.1 1 1 JR Hazlewood (AUS) 2016-2018 28 27 253.1 12 1230 50 6/52 24.60 4.85 30.3 0 2 JW Hastings (AUS) 2016-2017 16 16 140.2 4 769 31 6/45 24.80 5.47 27.1 1 1 TA Boult (NZ) 2016-2018 39 39 351.4 17 1898 76 7/34 24.97 5.39 27.7 2 3 LE Plunkett (ENG) 2016-2018 39 38 311.2 7 1802 69 5/52 26.11 5.78 27.0 5 1 CR Woakes (ENG) 2015-2018 39 38 318.0 22 1629 62 4/33 26.27 5.12 30.7 6 0 NLTC Perera (SL) 2016-2018 30 28 160.2 2 991 34 4/33 29.14 6.18 28.2 2 0 K Rabada (SA) 2015-2018 47 46 399.3 21 2054 70 4/39 29.34 5.14 34.2 5 0 TL Chatara (ZIM) 2016-2018 30 30 222.2 17 1152 39 4/33 29.53 5.18 34.2 1 0 Mashrafe Mortaza (BDESH) 2015-2018 33 33 278.3 12 1388 45 4/29 30.84 4.98 37.1 2 0 JO Holder (WI) 2015-2018 47 46 384.0 17 2015 64 5/27 31.48 5.24 36.0 1 2 JP Faulkner (AUS) 2016-2017 25 24 206.3 3 1147 36 4/32 31.86 5.55 34.4 2 0 PJ Cummins (AUS) 2016-2018 21 21 191.5 10 989 31 4/24 31.90 5.15 37.1 2 0 RAS Lakmal (SL) 2015-2018 42 41 308.2 17 1628 51 4/13 31.92 5.28 36.2 2 0 UT Yadav (INDIA) 2015-2018 23 22 194.0 5 1225 36 4/71 34.02 6.31 32.3 1 0 Mohammad Amir (PAK) 2016-2018 28 28 231.4 16 1126 33 3/16 34.12 4.86 42.1 0 0 AL Phehlukwayo (SA) 2016-2018 30 30 206.4 8 1229 35 4/40 35.11 5.94 35.4 2 0 DJ Willey (ENG) 2015-2018 36 35 245.3 10 1376 36 4/34 38.22 5.60 40.9 2 0 HH Pandya (INDIA) 2016-2018 41 40 289.5 3 1614 40 3/31 40.35 5.56 43.4 0 0 TG Southee (NZ) 2015-2018 35 35 309.5 18 1735 41 3/22 42.31 5.59 45.3 0 0 B Kumar (INDIA) 2015-2018 37 36 293.3 14 1657 37 5/42 44.78 5.64 47.5 0 1 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?bowling_pacespin=1;class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=bowling_average;qualmin1=30;qualval1=wickets;spanmax1=14+Sep+2018;spanmin1=14+Sep+2015;spanval1=span;team=1;team=2;team=25;team=3;team=4;team=5;team=6;team=7;team=8;team=9;template=results;type=bowling LORD_analyst, Mosher, Nikola and 1 other 1 1 2 Link to comment
Nikola Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, express bowling said: In the last 3 years, Bhuvi has the highest average ( 44.8 ) among all ODI pacers who have taken 30+ wickets. This is poor performance. ( 3 years is the usual period used for ICC rankings ) Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5 Hasan Ali (PAK) 2016-2018 33 33 272.1 11 1420 68 5/34 20.88 5.21 24.0 1 3 JJ Bumrah (INDIA) 2016-2018 37 37 309.5 19 1440 64 5/27 22.50 4.64 29.0 3 1 MJ Henry (NZ) 2015-2018 19 18 161.0 8 884 39 5/40 22.66 5.49 24.7 3 1 MA Starc (AUS) 2016-2018 26 26 234.3 12 1185 51 4/29 23.23 5.05 27.5 3 0 Mustafizur Rahman (BDESH) 2015-2018 24 23 184.2 9 894 38 5/34 23.52 4.84 29.1 1 1 JR Hazlewood (AUS) 2016-2018 28 27 253.1 12 1230 50 6/52 24.60 4.85 30.3 0 2 JW Hastings (AUS) 2016-2017 16 16 140.2 4 769 31 6/45 24.80 5.47 27.1 1 1 TA Boult (NZ) 2016-2018 39 39 351.4 17 1898 76 7/34 24.97 5.39 27.7 2 3 LE Plunkett (ENG) 2016-2018 39 38 311.2 7 1802 69 5/52 26.11 5.78 27.0 5 1 CR Woakes (ENG) 2015-2018 39 38 318.0 22 1629 62 4/33 26.27 5.12 30.7 6 0 NLTC Perera (SL) 2016-2018 30 28 160.2 2 991 34 4/33 29.14 6.18 28.2 2 0 K Rabada (SA) 2015-2018 47 46 399.3 21 2054 70 4/39 29.34 5.14 34.2 5 0 TL Chatara (ZIM) 2016-2018 30 30 222.2 17 1152 39 4/33 29.53 5.18 34.2 1 0 Mashrafe Mortaza (BDESH) 2015-2018 33 33 278.3 12 1388 45 4/29 30.84 4.98 37.1 2 0 JO Holder (WI) 2015-2018 47 46 384.0 17 2015 64 5/27 31.48 5.24 36.0 1 2 JP Faulkner (AUS) 2016-2017 25 24 206.3 3 1147 36 4/32 31.86 5.55 34.4 2 0 PJ Cummins (AUS) 2016-2018 21 21 191.5 10 989 31 4/24 31.90 5.15 37.1 2 0 RAS Lakmal (SL) 2015-2018 42 41 308.2 17 1628 51 4/13 31.92 5.28 36.2 2 0 UT Yadav (INDIA) 2015-2018 23 22 194.0 5 1225 36 4/71 34.02 6.31 32.3 1 0 Mohammad Amir (PAK) 2016-2018 28 28 231.4 16 1126 33 3/16 34.12 4.86 42.1 0 0 AL Phehlukwayo (SA) 2016-2018 30 30 206.4 8 1229 35 4/40 35.11 5.94 35.4 2 0 DJ Willey (ENG) 2015-2018 36 35 245.3 10 1376 36 4/34 38.22 5.60 40.9 2 0 HH Pandya (INDIA) 2016-2018 41 40 289.5 3 1614 40 3/31 40.35 5.56 43.4 0 0 TG Southee (NZ) 2015-2018 35 35 309.5 18 1735 41 3/22 42.31 5.59 45.3 0 0 B Kumar (INDIA) 2015-2018 37 36 293.3 14 1657 37 5/42 44.78 5.64 47.5 0 1 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?bowling_pacespin=1;class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=bowling_average;qualmin1=30;qualval1=wickets;spanmax1=14+Sep+2018;spanmin1=14+Sep+2015;spanval1=span;team=1;team=2;team=25;team=3;team=4;team=5;team=6;team=7;team=8;team=9;template=results;type=bowling Yeah also people say he is not wicket taker but more of economical bowlers well many here in list are way more economical than him and if you go more deep into stats his economy vs top countries will be around 6+ for sure. Idk how he deserves spot in side when youngsters like siraj can perform way better than him. Edit: See his stats vs top countries since 2015. Sad thing is even hardik pandya (who is not even good 5th bowling option) has better avg and stats than bhuvi :( These defender of bhuvi are silent cause he is good guy but you can't just be good guy and be such underperformer. He surely doesn't deserve an spot for worldcup. Edited September 14, 2018 by Nikola raki05, LORD_analyst and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) Bhuvi is thought to be an economical bowler in ODIs ... but has the 5th highest economy rate in the last 3 years among 20 pacers with 30+ wickets. Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5 JJ Bumrah (INDIA) 2016-2018 37 37 309.5 19 1440 64 5/27 22.50 4.64 29.0 3 1 Mustafizur Rahman (BDESH) 2015-2018 24 23 184.2 9 894 38 5/34 23.52 4.84 29.1 1 1 JR Hazlewood (AUS) 2016-2018 28 27 253.1 12 1230 50 6/52 24.60 4.85 30.3 0 2 Mohammad Amir (PAK) 2016-2018 28 28 231.4 16 1126 33 3/16 34.12 4.86 42.1 0 0 Mashrafe Mortaza (BDESH) 2015-2018 33 33 278.3 12 1388 45 4/29 30.84 4.98 37.1 2 0 MA Starc (AUS) 2016-2018 26 26 234.3 12 1185 51 4/29 23.23 5.05 27.5 3 0 CR Woakes (ENG) 2015-2018 39 38 318.0 22 1629 62 4/33 26.27 5.12 30.7 6 0 K Rabada (SA) 2015-2018 47 46 399.3 21 2054 70 4/39 29.34 5.14 34.2 5 0 PJ Cummins (AUS) 2016-2018 21 21 191.5 10 989 31 4/24 31.90 5.15 37.1 2 0 TL Chatara (ZIM) 2016-2018 30 30 222.2 17 1152 39 4/33 29.53 5.18 34.2 1 0 Hasan Ali (PAK) 2016-2018 33 33 272.1 11 1420 68 5/34 20.88 5.21 24.0 1 3 JO Holder (WI) 2015-2018 47 46 384.0 17 2015 64 5/27 31.48 5.24 36.0 1 2 RAS Lakmal (SL) 2015-2018 42 41 308.2 17 1628 51 4/13 31.92 5.28 36.2 2 0 TA Boult (NZ) 2016-2018 39 39 351.4 17 1898 76 7/34 24.97 5.39 27.7 2 3 JW Hastings (AUS) 2016-2017 16 16 140.2 4 769 31 6/45 24.80 5.47 27.1 1 1 MJ Henry (NZ) 2015-2018 19 18 161.0 8 884 39 5/40 22.66 5.49 24.7 3 1 JP Faulkner (AUS) 2016-2017 25 24 206.3 3 1147 36 4/32 31.86 5.55 34.4 2 0 HH Pandya (INDIA) 2016-2018 41 40 289.5 3 1614 40 3/31 40.35 5.56 43.4 0 0 TG Southee (NZ) 2015-2018 35 35 309.5 18 1735 41 3/22 42.31 5.59 45.3 0 0 DJ Willey (ENG) 2015-2018 36 35 245.3 10 1376 36 4/34 38.22 5.60 40.9 2 0 B Kumar (INDIA) 2015-2018 37 36 293.3 14 1657 37 5/42 44.78 5.64 47.5 0 1 LE Plunkett (ENG) 2016-2018 39 38 311.2 7 1802 69 5/52 26.11 5.78 27.0 5 1 AL Phehlukwayo (SA) 2016-2018 30 30 206.4 8 1229 35 4/40 35.11 5.94 35.4 2 0 NLTC Perera (SL) 2016-2018 30 28 160.2 2 991 34 4/33 29.14 6.18 28.2 2 0 UT Yadav (INDIA) 2015-2018 23 22 194.0 5 1225 36 4/71 34.02 6.31 32.3 1 0 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?bowling_pacespin=1;class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=economy_rate;qualmin1=30;qualval1=wickets;spanmax1=14+Sep+2018;spanmin1=14+Sep+2015;spanval1=span;team=1;team=2;team=25;team=3;team=4;team=5;team=6;team=7;team=8;team=9;template=results;type=bowling Edited September 14, 2018 by express bowling Nikola, LORD_analyst, UrmiSinhaRay and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 He is our most accurate bowler but cannot sustain pace especially if he is going to play a lot of cricket. If he is fully match fit and his back is perfectly fine, I think we should play him in the UAE. Bumrah has just played 3 tests and UAE wickets have the least pace and bounce even less than those in India. No point bumrah hitting the deck hard when it's only gonna rise knee high. Just get bhuvi to bowl that good length a little further outside off stump and pack the offside field. Later on I think there might be reverse swing which he can exploit better than bumrah. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nikhil_cric said: He is our most accurate bowler but cannot sustain pace especially if he is going to play a lot of cricket. If he is fully match fit and his back is perfectly fine, I think we should play him in the UAE. Bumrah has just played 3 tests and UAE wickets have the least pace and bounce even less than those in India. No point bumrah hitting the deck hard when it's only gonna rise knee high. Just get bhuvi to bowl that good length a little further outside off stump and pack the offside field. Later on I think there might be reverse swing which he can exploit better than bumrah. Bumrah has done well on the low tracks in India. He has the ability to bowl stump directed quick and skiddy deliveries too. He is the No.1 ranked ODI pacer for a reason. Regarding Bhuvi ... we have to develop a backup before replacing him. And that can be done only against weak teams or in bilaterals. Khaleel needs to be in the playing 11 against Hong Kong and in the bilateral ODI series vs WI. Edited September 14, 2018 by express bowling raki05, Nikola and UrmiSinhaRay 1 2 Link to comment
raki05 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 21 hours ago, Tibarn said: Overrated depends on what one rates him as: If one rates him as one of the best overall bowlers in ODIs , I think they are clearly wrong: he doesn't take wickets, so he puts pressure on the other bowlers to take them. If one rates him as one of the best death bowlers in ODIs, then I think they are right. Him being best death bowler is also overrated. One of the reason we got massacred in ct17 final was him as well. Where no body like hafeez belted him in death overs. So no he is not best death bowler around only bumrah and starc are. UrmiSinhaRay and Nikola 1 1 Link to comment
velu Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 1 hour ago, raki05 said: Him being best death bowler is also overrated. One of the reason we got massacred in ct17 final was him as well. Where no body like hafeez belted him in death overs. So no he is not best death bowler around only bumrah and starc are. can we say that he is one of the most improved death bowlers ? UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 51 minutes ago, velu said: can we say that he is one of the most improved death bowlers ? yes in IPL UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 15 minutes ago, rkt.india said: yes in IPL he should stick to IPL only then. Has been useless for country in odis. UrmiSinhaRay, LORD_analyst and Frustrated 1 2 Link to comment
Frustrated Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 I think the only reason selectors are persisting with Bhuvi is his batting ability down the order. Can be handy at times. We seriously lack a proper pace bowling allrounder. Hence , Bhuvi is an automatic choice even on flat decks. No other choice till the WC 2019. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, Frustrated said: I think the only reason selectors are persisting with Bhuvi is his batting ability down the order. Can be handy at times. We seriously lack a proper pace bowling allrounder. Hence , Bhuvi is an automatic choice even on flat decks. No other choice till the WC 2019. He is not match winner with bat even if he performs once in 5 or 6 innings. He is bit similar to Ashwin in terms of batting and won't do any great against good opposition and we already have bits of pieces cricketer like him in hardik pandya. So team will have to make choice between pandya and bhuvi. We can't just go with these both trundlers at once. LORD_analyst and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment
vivek04 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 There is no reason to kept in the team. The stats don't lie. He is not a ODI bowler. Further, nor in test except conditions suited for him. His pace will get cratered in England World cup. But selectors are morons who don't learn from mistakes. Better don't waste time to watch these army of trundlers and bogey batsmen in asia cup. UrmiSinhaRay and LORD_analyst 1 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) I get really angry when umesh has to work his ass hard on these flat indian decks and this trundler bhuvi comes and gets easiest pitches to bowl on in test cricket. If he can't perform in all conditions better kick him and find all condition bowler. This is like playing dhawan only on flat decks and making him look like bradman. Edited September 14, 2018 by Nikola beetle, UrmiSinhaRay and zen 1 1 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 @beetle Stop reacting trolls. I am talking facts & he is trundler doesn't matter if you are die hard fan or not. Accept it as early as possible cause you will come barking after he gets 1 or 2 wickets against hong kong. To be fair he doesn't deserve a spot in squad leave xi. He is really lucky to be there along with many batsman who have failed in past. LORD_analyst, beetle, UrmiSinhaRay and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment
Tibarn Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 4 hours ago, raki05 said: Him being best death bowler is also overrated. One of the reason we got massacred in ct17 final was him as well. Where no body like hafeez belted him in death overs. So no he is not best death bowler around only bumrah and starc are. A BK fan would say Bumrah is the one who failed in the CT and Bhuvi did his job overall, and they both went for ~8 an over in the death(last 5 overs) http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8037/scorecard/1022375/india-vs-pakistan-final-icc-champions-trophy-2017 http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8037/commentary/1022375/india-vs-pakistan-final-icc-champions-trophy-2017?innings=1 BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB B Kumar 10 2 44 1 4.40 34 2 2 1 0 JJ Bumrah 9 0 68 0 7.55 22 8 0 5 3 R Ashwin 10 0 70 0 7.00 25 4 3 4 0 HH Pandya 10 0 53 1 5.30 28 5 0 1 0 RA Jadeja 8 0 67 0 8.37 16 8 2 0 0 KM Jadhav 3 0 27 1 9.00 3 0 2 2 0 The truth is, at least in my opinion, we lost the CT because we were carrying Jadeja/Ashwin in the team, both of who were truly terrible in ODIs for the past few years. Also Kohli managed the bowlers poorly where Bumrah ended up with a over remaining and Jadhav was overbowled and gave up 16 runs in the 45th. AuxiliA, UrmiSinhaRay, beetle and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment
beetle Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 9 minutes ago, Nikola said: @beetle Stop reacting trolls. I am talking facts & he is trundler doesn't matter if you are die hard fan or not. Accept it as early as possible cause you will come barking after he gets 1 or 2 wickets against hong kong. To be fair he doesn't deserve a spot in squad leave xi. He is really lucky to be there along with many batsman who have failed in past. I read it yesterday and did not react. But looks like you want to get the troll vote . So I just made you happy. Khush ho le. Jimmy Cliff, Rasgulla and Nikola 1 2 Link to comment
zen Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, Nikola said: @beetle Stop reacting trolls. I am talking facts & he is trundler doesn't matter if you are die hard fan or not. Accept it as early as possible cause you will come barking after he gets 1 or 2 wickets against hong kong. To be fair he doesn't deserve a spot in squad leave xi. He is really lucky to be there along with many batsman who have failed in past. If we look at the stats for the last 2-3 years, the perception about players such as Rahane and Bhuvi would change UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 6 hours ago, express bowling said: Bumrah has done well on the low tracks in India. He has the ability to bowl stump directed quick and skiddy deliveries too. He is the No.1 ranked ODI pacer for a reason. Regarding Bhuvi ... we have to develop a backup before replacing him. And that can be done only against weak teams or in bilaterals. Khaleel needs to be in the playing 11 against Hong Kong and in the bilateral ODI series vs WI. Indian ODI pitches are not as bad as that Abu Dhabi pitch which has the lowest bounce and pace probably of all pitches in the world. Now this varies from series to series but generally that's just a terrible crickhet pitch and we occasionally see that in Dubai as well. I think we should take the call based on the given pitch on the day of the match. If it's the usual pitch , bumrah would be an absolute waste imo. However , if, given the magnitude of India laying Pakistan, they have actually got a decent wicket then yes bumrah should play. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
raki05 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 3 hours ago, velu said: can we say that he is one of the most improved death bowlers ? The last 3 year data doesn't say that. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now