Jump to content

KL Rahul's 50-overs conundrum


Recommended Posts

With the World Cup less than a year away, the Asia Cup was an opportunity for India to answer a few important white-ball questions. Three matches into the tournament, the most glaring questions center around KL Rahul.

Rahul came to the UAE on the back of an interesting white-ball summer. His T20 form was imperious. Fourteen IPL innings brought him 659 runs - all of them as an opener - at an average of 54.91 and a strike rate of 158.41. He made a 36-ball 70 in his only innings in Ireland, and followed that up with an unbeaten 54-ball 101 at No. 3 in the first T20I against England in Manchester.

Given that run of 20-over scores, Rahul might have expected a run in the ODI side too. But after scoring 9 not out - he came in towards the end of a successful chase - and 0 in the first two ODIs against England, he was left out of the series decider. And now, in the Asia Cup, he has sat out of India's three matches so far - this despite an extra middle-order slot becoming available with the selectors resting Virat Kohli.

This in-today, out-tomorrow sequence is fairly typical of Rahul's ODI career. Since his debut in 2016, Rahul has only played in 12 out of India's 47 ODIs. And since last year's tour of Sri Lanka, when the team management first tried him in the middle order, he has only featured in six out of 28 ODIs.

The team management gave Rahul an extended red-ball run in England, despite his averaging 14.12 in the first four Test matches. With the series lost, there were plenty of voices calling for the inclusion of Prithvi Shaw, but Rahul kept his place for the fifth Test at The Oval and scored a morale-boosting hundred on the final day of the tour.

Rahul has never quite enjoyed the same kind of run in the side in ODIs. His longest uninterrupted sequence so far is four matches, in Sri Lanka last year, when he was given a chance in the middle order after Ajinkya Rahane had claimed the back-up opener's role by scoring 306 runs at 67.20 in five matches in the West Indies.

Rahul only got to bat three times in those four matches, and each time he batted in a different position - No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5. He didn't really grab the chance, scoring 4, 17 and 7, and struggled to read the mystery spin of Akila Dananjaya, who dismissed him in all three innings.

While the situation - not having a long run of matches or a settled slot in the batting order - isn't ideal, it's the reality for anyone looking to break into India's middle order. There's just too much competition.

Ambati Rayudu, who is far from a regular in the side, averages 50.39 after 33 ODI innings. He came back into the ODI side after an IPL season as good as Rahul's. He top-scored for Chennai Super Kings - 602 in 16 innings at an average of 43.00 and a strike rate of 149.75 - while showing a lot more adaptability - opening, batting in the middle order, and even finishing innings.

There's Kedar Jadhav, who has come close to nailing the No. 6 spot with his innovative batting and invaluable part-time spin. There's Dinesh Karthik, who averages 53.80 since his ODI comeback last year. There's Manish Pandey, who can't break into the XI despite smashing 366 runs without being dismissed in a Quadrangular tournament where he batted against Australia A, South Africa A and India A.

Outside the squad there is Shreyas Iyer, who's made two fifties in five ODI innings, and has just scored a List A hundred for Mumbai in the Vijay Hazare Trophy. And there's still Rahane, who made 148 in Mumbai's previous match.

Given all the other options India have, batsman simply have to grab every opportunity. And while his opportunities have been scattered and seldom in one batting slot, Rahul hasn't yet grabbed them: after scoring 100*, 33 and 63* in his debut series against Zimbabwe, he has a highest score of 17 in eight ODI innings.

 

But while some of the other middle-order contenders may have made better use of their opportunities, Rahul is perhaps more lavishly gifted than all of them, and capable of batting at a jaw-dropping tempo in white-ball cricket. He's only shown it in T20 so far - in his most recent IPL season, and while scoring international hundreds against West Indies and England - but he's surely capable of translating that ability into 50-overs cricket too.

The difficulty for Rahul is that a slot at the top of the order, which is where he's batted all his life, is probably out of bounds, with Rohit Sharma and Shikhar Dhawan firmly established as one of the great opening pairs in ODI history. Virat Kohli, one of the all-time-great No. 3s, follows them to the crease. Rahul's opportunities are only likely to come at Nos. 4 or 5, positions that demand a certain amount of flexibility from batsmen, who from one match to another could be called on to maintain momentum, rebuild, change gears gradually, or explode upon arrival.

Does Rahul have the game yet to adapt? Does he still need to learn the more workmanlike aspects of middle-order batting, which the likes of Rayudu and Karthik are adept at? Can he tone down the impulsiveness that sometimes consumes him before the bowler gets him? Will making these changes take away from the very qualities that make him such a dangerous batsman?

There is possibly one solution, a case for India to look at Rahul as a No. 3 batsman and have Kohli bat at No. 4. This might not need Rahul to temper his flamboyance too much, at least on flat surfaces where he can trust his eye - such pitches are quite likely to be the norm at the World Cup next year. This could allow India to retain a formidable top three, in theory, with Kohli controlling the second half of the innings, and MS Dhoni perhaps gaining a little more freedom to go after the bowling and bat like he did in the IPL this year.

It would mean a change of role for Kohli, but not a massive one. And his record at No. 4 is more than impressive. In 37 innings there, he has made 1744 runs - with seven hundreds and eight fifties - at an average of 58.13 and a strike rate of 90.40, which isn't too far off his record at No. 3, where he averages 61.48 and strikes at 93.23.

To adopt this plan, however, the team management would need to weigh up Rahul's explosive potential, with the inherent risk of early dismissals that comes with his natural style, against the middle-order methods of Rayudu or Karthik, who have fewer frills but perhaps a little more know-how in adapting to different situations.

 

LInk - http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/1160378.html

 
Link to comment
30 minutes ago, zen said:

Rayudu, Karthik and Jadhav cannot complain as they got a decent run but have not impressed with the bat (though Jadhav has only 1 inning) so far 

 

But at least with jadhav now he can provide those quality overs in the middle and so far his numbers with the bat look very good. The other two guys yeah they've had umpteen chances and flattered to deceive. Delegate them to TNPL.

Link to comment

I am OK with Karthik and Jadhav playing.

 

They have have their own justifications (although not very satisfactory but still enough to give them a last chance)

 

Karthik : He saved us from getting embarrassed by winning us the Nidhahas Trophy after we had nearly lost it. He scored 22 runs alone off Rubel Hussain in the 2nd last over of Nidhahas trophy. And Rubel is not exactly a useless bowler. He is an OK bowler. 

 

Jadhav : He has clearly improved his fitness and is a clever part time bowler. Reads the mind of the batsman a bit. Can provide us vital breakthroughs in asian wickets. Can accelerate the scoring rate.  He certainly adds value to the team.

 

But Rayudu ? Seriously, what has he done?  

He not only scores very slowly, but has an ugly stance while batting. Not a clean hitter of the ball.  Never looks perfectly set for an acceleration despite playing more than 50 deliveries.  He brings nothing new to the table. 

KL must replace him 2morrow.  When Kohli comes back, he may or may not play depending on the situation. 

Edited by Frustrated
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

why cnt he bat at 4

HE made runs at 4 in IPL and made a 100 against wi in t20 at 4

Odi gives u a lot more time then t20

 

 

 

he did get decent run at #4 , didnt cement his place ..

all his fans ( including me ) decided opening is the best slot for him :p:

 

i am thinking about opening with rahul and demoting rohit to #5 or #6 .. we need a late order hitter agaisnt pace and in england its better to hide him from the new ball

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, velu said:

 

he did get decent run at #4 , didnt cement his place ..

all his fans ( including me ) decided opening is the best slot for him :p:

decent run

he played 3 games at no.4 in which he was not out once

how is that decent

a talent like him shud get 20 games 

14 minutes ago, velu said:

 

i am thinking about opening with rahul and demoting rohit to #5 or #6 .. we need a late order hitter agaisnt pace and in england its better to hide him from the new ball

Rohit will fail at 5 n 6

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

decent run

he played 3 games at no.4 in which he was not out once

how is that decent

a talent like him shud get 20 games 

Rohit will fail at 5 n 6

 

we had a long thread on this ..

but he got more than a decent run even in the series vs england .. 

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

who says he is not no.4

he has got a 100 in t20 against wi at 4 , odi give u more time

 

how have u jumped to the conclusion without him even getting a chance

Give you a few examples..     

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/18018/scorecard/1119547/england-vs-india-2nd-odi-ind-in-eng-2018

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/17891/scorecard/1109607/sri-lanka-vs-india-3rd-odi-sl-v-ind-2017

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...