Jump to content

No trundler policy


zen

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Vilander said:

difficult since he is the best when it comes to a swinging seaming wicket and has very good death bowling skill.

Even Kapil Dev could not do much when he lost his pace .... Bowlers like him can be played if conditions allow. His avg is high too and we have good options 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
1 minute ago, zen said:

Even Kapil Dev could not do much when he lost his pace 

agreed, but we have seen Bhuvi is able to use optimum pace, while clearly not a fast bowler he has moved to fast medium and hit 140 + in effort balls in LOI and be around that 135 mark when he needs to even in tests - with his skill complement that makes him very effective. If say someone like  siraj comes in and does what he does but faster then yes - we had the same scenario there was an elaborate Umesh vs Bhuvi time...i was one of the troops that thought Umesh will get more and more accurate and swing both ways at 140 - 148..which he did in one Aus series and that BD home test unplayable stuff then reverted to line and length issues - the thing i like about Bhuv and Bumrah is that they are mostly accurate and deal with inaccurate lengths or make appropriate length and line changes within an ODI game leave alone a session worth in tests - thats gold.

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Vilander said:

agreed, but we have seen Bhuvi is able to use optimum pace, while clearly not a fast bowler he has moved to fast medium and hit 140 + in effort balls in LOI and be around that 135 mark when he needs to even in tests - with his skill complement that makes him very effective. If say someone like  siraj comes in and does what he does but faster then yes - we had the same scenario there was an elaborate Umesh vs Bhuvi time...i was one of the troops that thought Umesh will get more and more accurate and swing both ways at 140 - 148..which he did in one Aus series and that BD home test unplayable stuff then reverted to line and length issues - the thing i like about Bhuv and Bumrah is that they are mostly accurate and deal with inaccurate lengths or make appropriate length and line changes within an ODI game leave alone a session worth in tests - thats gold.

As mentioned in OP, Bhuvi can be played if conditions demand .... But his avg is on the higher side and we have better options .... if we have a no trundler policy, bowlers like Bhuvi will have to do a lot better than what he has done so far :lol:

 

In the last two years in ODIs, Bhuvi has been one of our worst specialist quick/medium bowlers:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date greater than or equal to 3 Oct 2016 remove greater than or equal to 3 Oct 2016 from query
Qualifications innings bowled in greater than or equal to 10 remove innings bowled in greater than or equal to 10 from query
Ordered by bowling average (ascending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 9 of 9   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI AveAscending Econ SR 4 5  
Kuldeep Yadav 2017-2018 29 27 250.4 8 1166 58 6/25 20.10 4.65 25.9 2 1 investigate this query
JJ Bumrah 2016-2018 37 37 308.5 20 1451 61 5/27 23.78 4.69 30.3 1 1 investigate this query
YS Chahal 2017-2018 28 27 247.1 8 1194 45 5/22 26.53 4.83 32.9 1 1 investigate this query
UT Yadav 2016-2018 16 15 128.1 4 757 26 4/71 29.11 5.90 29.5 1 0 investigate this query
KM Jadhav 2016-2018 39 26 133.5 1 651 22 3/23 29.59 4.86 36.5 0 0 investigate this query
B Kumar 2017-2018 35 34 269.5 15 1375 36 5/42 38.19 5.09 44.9 0 1 investigate this query
AR Patel 2016-2017 13 13 120.1 3 538 14 3/34 38.42 4.47 51.5 0 0 investigate this query
HH Pandya 2016-2018 42 41 294.4 3 1638 40 3/31 40.95 5.55 44.2 0 0 investigate this query
RA Jadeja 2017-2018 14 14 127.0 2 637 15 4/29 42.46 5.01 50.8 1 0 investigate this query

 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, zen said:

As mentioned in OP, Bhuvi can be played if conditions demand .... But his avg is on the higher side and we have better option .... if we have a no trundler policy, bowlers like Bhuvi will have to do a lot better 

 

In the last two years, Bhuvi is one of our worst specialist quick/medium bowlers:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date greater than or equal to 3 Oct 2016 remove greater than or equal to 3 Oct 2016 from query
Qualifications innings bowled in greater than or equal to 10 remove innings bowled in greater than or equal to 10 from query
Ordered by bowling average (ascending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 9 of 9   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI AveAscending Econ SR 4 5  
Kuldeep Yadav 2017-2018 29 27 250.4 8 1166 58 6/25 20.10 4.65 25.9 2 1 investigate this query
JJ Bumrah 2016-2018 37 37 308.5 20 1451 61 5/27 23.78 4.69 30.3 1 1 investigate this query
YS Chahal 2017-2018 28 27 247.1 8 1194 45 5/22 26.53 4.83 32.9 1 1 investigate this query
UT Yadav 2016-2018 16 15 128.1 4 757 26 4/71 29.11 5.90 29.5 1 0 investigate this query
KM Jadhav 2016-2018 39 26 133.5 1 651 22 3/23 29.59 4.86 36.5 0 0 investigate this query
B Kumar 2017-2018 35 34 269.5 15 1375 36 5/42 38.19 5.09 44.9 0 1 investigate this query
AR Patel 2016-2017 13 13 120.1 3 538 14 3/34 38.42 4.47 51.5 0 0 investigate this query
HH Pandya 2016-2018 42 41 294.4 3 1638 40 3/31 40.95 5.55 44.2 0 0 investigate this query
RA Jadeja 2017-2018 14 14 127.0 2 637 15 4/29 42.46 5.01 50.8 1 0 investigate this query

 

 

oh ok..we are talkng ODI.. 

 

but those stats are revealing still.  Umesh is doing fine in ODI. Bhuv is pretty poor in the same period. 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Vilander said:

oh ok..we are talkng ODI.. 

 

but those stats are revealing still.  Umesh is doing fine in ODI. Bhuv is pretty poor in the same period. 

Even in tests, Bhuvi will not do much in unhelpful conditions. He probably was played and only did well where the ball swung prodigiously 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

Pacers who can bowl quick    or quickish with bounce     in India now

 

a)  In Team India

 

1. Bumrah  -  skilled  ( bouncy )

2. Shami  -  skilled

3. Umesh - swing and reverse swing

4. Khaleel  -  skilled   (  tall  )

5. Siraj  -  skilled for his experience level  (  tallish  )

6. Ishant  -  accurate in tests  (  tall  )

7. Pandya   (  tallish  )

 

b)   Playing for India-A

 

8. Saini  -  skilled  (  tallish  )

9. Rajpoot  -  skilled  (  tall  )

10. Prasidh  -  skilled for his experience level  (  tall  )

 

c)  Other prominent pacers

 

11. Mavi  -  skilled for his experience level   ( bouncy )

12. Nagarkoti  -   skilled for his experience level

13. Avesh  - Bowls a heavy ball  (  tall  )

14. Aaron    ( bouncy ) 

15. Khejroliya  - bowls a heavy ball  (  tall  )

16. Thampi -

17. Asif

18. Warrier - skilled for his experience level  (  tallish  )

19. Nathu  -  skilled for his experience level

20. Aniket C  -  skilled  (  tall  )

21. Sangwan

 

 

 

Prominent medium pacers    or short seamers without extra pace  

 

a)  In Team India

 

1.  Bhuvi  -  skilled 

2.  Kaul  -  not sufficient skills for his low pace and short height 

3. Chahar  -  just a swing bowler 

4. Thakur -   not sufficient skills for his standard pace and short height  

 

 

b)   Playing for India-A

 

5. Gurbani  -  just a swing bowler 

 

 

c)  Other prominent pacers

 

6. Unadkat  -  not sufficient skills for his low pace   ( tall )  played for India 6 months back

7. Dhawal  -  not sufficient skills for his low pace  

 

 

 

 

So ... we are seeing that most prominent trundlers are getting chances and quite a few skilled quicks are sitting out.

 

 

 

This gives hope that after kaul chahar thakur flops....next one will be from better lot for years to come.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, SUMO said:

This gives hope that after kaul chahar thakur flops....next one will be from better lot for years to come.

 

Supply line is long for quick pacers  ... but new additions to our squads in the last one year or thereabouts ...  have been 4 trundlers and 2 quicks.

 

That is the worrying part.

 

The IPL successes are making their way into ODI teams.

 

But they are forgetting that the first 40 overs of ODIs are not like T20s.   T20 is the only format where some trundlers succeed as bowling variations is the key.    But bowling good lines and lengths at pace is needed in the first 40 overs of ODIs.

 

Who knows ... the next IPL may bring to the fore new trundlers who will get in the national squad quickly.

 

This is where a bit of vision and a clear idea about requirements of ODIs and tests is required.

Link to comment

Need bowlers who have good control over line and length. Trundlers or no trundlers wasn't an issue. Problem was that trundlers were considered as line and length bowlers who lacked pace, when in fact they hardly had any control. Have seen trundlers bowling short or on pads all the time. 

 

Any bowler who can bowl consistently at good line and lengths should play - Bumrah, Shami, Bhuvi, Ishant all do that right now.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...