zen Posted October 5, 2018 Author Share Posted October 5, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: An attack featuring Hadlee and Chatfield would be a handful for most batsmen today . Not on that kind of pitch though .... and the way Miandad and Pujara play spinners is somewhat similar In fact Qadir got 7 wkts in that game Link .... NZ spinners or part timers bowled 110 overs in that inning Edited October 5, 2018 by zen sandeep 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 29 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: An attack featuring Hadlee and Chatfield would be a handful for most batsmen today . Chatfield averaged 32 with an SR of 84 in supposedly a bowling friendly era. He would not trouble a tailender these days. if he could 32 in that era, I dont think he would average anything below 45 and SR below 100 in this era. sandeep 1 Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 16 minutes ago, zen said: Not on that kind of pitch though .... and the way Miandad and Pujara play spinners is somewhat similar In fact Qadir got 7 wkts in that game Link .... NZ spinners or part timers bowled 110 overs in that inning That's actually one of his major weaknesses - post 2013, he doesn't cash in even on relatively benign pitches outside the subcontinent. In the subcontinent, he finds a way to score on rank turners or green mambas but outside he fails to convert his starts even on roads generally. I'd actually back him to get a 40-50 on a tough wicket than get a daddy hundred on a flat pitch in SENA. Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Just now, rkt.india said: Chatfield averaged 32 with an SR of 84 in supposedly a bowling friendly era. He would not trouble a tailender these days. if he could 32 in that era, I dont think he would average anything below 45 and SR below 100 in this era. Going by that Lahori logic, you must think Kapil would also average 38-40 in this era at a SR of 80 odd . Rightarmfast and Vilander 1 1 Link to comment
zen Posted October 5, 2018 Author Share Posted October 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said: That's actually one of his major weaknesses - post 2013, he doesn't cash in even on relatively benign pitches outside the subcontinent. In the subcontinent, he finds a way to score on rank turners or green mambas but outside he fails to convert his starts even on roads generally. I'd actually back him to get a 40-50 on a tough wicket than get a daddy hundred on a flat pitch in SENA. Daddy 100s, you don't score everyday. If he can get 100-120 that could help his avg too to get closer to 40 Link to comment
zen Posted October 5, 2018 Author Share Posted October 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: you must think Kapil would also average 38-40 in this era at a SR of 80 odd . Kapil of 90s (the trundler) was close to those numbers, esp the SR Records type bowling analysis [change type] View career summary [change view] Start of match date between 1 Jan 1990 and 31 Dec 1999 Ordered by default (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 5 10 unfiltered 1978-1994 131 227 4623.2 1060 12867 434 9/83 11/146 29.64 2.78 63.9 23 2 Profile filtered 1990-1994 28 53 1014.4 275 2418 75 5/97 8/163 32.24 2.38 81.1 2 0 The 92 test series in Aus actually helped him to improve the numbers .... In Aus, Kapil has usually been outstanding sandeep and Jimmy Cliff 2 Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 1 minute ago, zen said: Daddy 100s, you don't score everyday. If he can get 100-120 that could help his avg too to get closer to 40 Chalo baby 100s hi sahi. He has just 1 100 post 2013. Frankly I don't think he's ever gonna average more than the low 30s in SENA. What I wanna see from him is that when he gets those rare hundreds, he makes them count and wins India the tests. That is why his failure in the 2nd innings of the 4th Test pissed me off. He'd kept us alive with his 132* in the 1st dig and should've got another score in the 2nd innings to help us win the Test. That would've redeemed him big-time as an overseas Test bat. Link to comment
zen Posted October 5, 2018 Author Share Posted October 5, 2018 Just now, Jimmy Cliff said: Chalo baby 100s hi sahi. He has just 1 100 post 2013. Frankly I don't think he's ever gonna average more than the low 30s in SENA. What I wanna see from him is that when he gets those rare hundreds, he makes them count and wins India the tests. That is why his failure in the 2nd innings of the 4th Test pissed me off. He'd kept us alive with his 132* in the 1st dig and should've got another score in the 2nd innings to help us win the Test. That would've redeemed him big-time as an overseas Test bat. As Test cricket fans, we would want our specialists to be more successful .... but on the positive side, he was our 2nd best batsman in Eng .... even if he does not get big score, if he can play out the difficult sessions that would be good as well sandeep, Turning_track and diehardpacer 3 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: Going by that Lahori logic, you must think Kapil would also average 38-40 in this era at a SR of 80 odd . yes, very much possible. He might have same average as Ishant, Umesh but the problem is Kapil was a lone warrior for us in that era and if he has good company and support like Bumrah, Shami, he might do similar or better even in this era. While Chatfield had Hadlee to company and support but still was so poor. moreover even if we dont assume how will he do in this era, average of 32 and especially that SR of 84 is nothing to boast about. Edited October 5, 2018 by rkt.india Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, zen said: As Test cricket fans, we would want our specialists to be more successful .... but on the positive side, he was our 2nd best batsman in Eng .... even if he does not get big score, if he can play out the difficult sessions that would be good as well That he was. But he needs to build on this. I don't expect him to have series where he scores 400+ runs but if he scores 250-300 in a series @ 35-40 I wanna see him get a match-winning 100. I have similar expectation from Ashwin. He is not gonna run through sides like Murali-Warne but at least he should be taking 15-20 wickets in a 5 match series with one match winning 5-fer/10-fer. zen 1 Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 13 minutes ago, rkt.india said: yes, very much possible. He might have same average as Ishant, Umesh but the problem is Kapil was a lone warrior for us in that era and if he has good company and support like Bumrah, Shami, he might do similar or better even in this era. While Chatfield had Hadlee to company and support but still was so poor. moreover even if we dont assume how will he do in this era, average of 32 and especially that SR of 84 is nothing to boast about. Well if you think Kapil averaging close to 40 odd with the ball today is very much possible then what can I say. Chatfield was the support act to Hadlee and did his job more than well enough. A team like India would kill to have a pacer who averaged in the low 30s in the 80s while picking up 100+ wickets at a miserly ER of around 2.2. Nobody claimed his stats were boast worthy in the first place. OpeningBatsman and Rightarmfast 2 Link to comment
Khota Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 They love Miandad and we are not so sure about Pujara. i hate these comparison threads. Individuals don't mean anything it is the overall team. Link to comment
Tattieboy Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Come up with all stats you want, Pujara could not lace Miandad's boots as a batsman , never ever full stop !!! Rightarmfast 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 In Asia during 70s & 80s Miandad was never given LBW no matter how plumb it would get. Umpires used to favour their own team till neutral umpires came. But yeah Miandad was league ahead of Pujara. Link to comment
sandeep Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 12 minutes ago, Tattieboy said: Come up with all stats you want, Pujara could not lace Miandad's boots as a batsman , never ever full stop !!! careful tatti, the mask keeps leaking when you chomp at the bait like that! Sgattick10 and Vilander 2 Link to comment
putrevus Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Miandad as a batsman is on different level than Pujara.Miandad was a fighter to core. Link to comment
Tattieboy Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 27 minutes ago, sandeep said: careful tatti, the mask keeps leaking when you chomp at the bait like tha 31 minutes ago, sandeep said: careful tatti, the mask keeps leaking when you chomp at the bait like that! What mask would that be ? Link to comment
Vilander Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 1 hour ago, sandeep said: careful tatti, the mask keeps leaking when you chomp at the bait like that! what mask...flimsy skin has been visible all along..haha you can never take pak out of a pakistani. Tattieboy 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 5 minutes ago, Vilander said: what mask...flimsy skin has been visible all along..haha you can never take pak out of a pakistani. tch. Let him have his delusion Villie bhau. Vilander 1 Link to comment
zen Posted October 5, 2018 Author Share Posted October 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Nikola said: In Asia during 70s & 80s Miandad was never given LBW no matter how plumb it would get. Not in Asia but in Pak, which inflated his avg at home too Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now