Jump to content

For the love of God, Pant has to perform in LOIs


SK_IH

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Switchblade said:

Dk at least would play for 2-3 years not going anywhere but it’s pure seniority on the basis of which he is wk batsman but Pant has to prove himself as well and has to make it count.

 

I don't want him to change his approach completely. But he has to start focussing on timing a bit more than power. Reminds me of one guy. Saurabh Tiwary.  Don't want Pant go that way.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Switchblade said:

Dk at least would play for 2-3 years not going anywhere but it’s pure seniority on the basis of which he is wk batsman but Pant has to prove himself as well and has to make it count.

Yeah we as a fan of Pant's flamboyant batting are frustrated every time when he fails to capitalize on any opportunity,but atmost he has played 4  international t20s ,we should be little patient with him

Atleast he deserves some more chance 

Link to comment

on second thoughts i see no wrong in his innings yesterday, he was just trying to play T20 the way it ought to be played , the shot didnt come off but we need such batsman in T20s atleast. Every batsman cant play acc to situation.  In ODIs these kind of shots early on should be avoided. I hope such wisdom is there in TM and he gets full backing.

Link to comment
11 hours ago, Switchblade said:

Average of 28 in List A Odi Cricket was bit surprised.

 

Pant's approach to batting maybe the answer to this.

 

He either powers or muscles the ball or shuts shop completely.

 

This approach may work in tests where shutting shop is ok for some time.

 

And it usually works in T20s where hitting the ball on flat decks is the norm.

 

But ODIs require rotating the strike and pacing the innings unless one is batting in the last 7 overs or as an opener.

 

As he matures, he will learn to rotate the strike and pace his innings.

Link to comment

Thing is that he is suited for short form games and does not have the best technique which will be exposed on days like this. I am still not convinced by him in Tests (but we do not have many options so worth trying him out - innings like the last Eng test will build him as a cricketer) but he should be given an extended run in limited overs. 

 

Problem is that they are out to sacrifice him for Dhoni. He has few more matches to prove himself. 

Link to comment

It's criminal to ask a young keeper, who has played all his life as a keeper batsman, to play purely as a batsman (even in u-19 WC, Pant was the keeper and Ishan Kishan played as a batsman). Can destroy someone's confidence. Has not happened with any other young keeper in last 15-20 years. In 2002, Parthiv came in, got replaced by DK in 2004, then Dhoni came in late 2004. DK played as a specialist batsman for a few years in 2006-08 and that stalled his evolution at the peak of his career. I hope we do not repeat the same mistake with Pant. 

 

I hope someone in the team management is speaking to him regularly. On the field he looks lost and not as energetic as a 20 year old should be. Compare his body language in IPL or even Tests and vs how it was in the 2 ODIs and T20 yesterday.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Lannister said:

I am not sure middle order is the place for him. He needs to open the innings, so drop either Dhawan or Sharma from the the team. Their batting has become stale.

Rahul cnt find a place, pant has no chance in top 3

dhawan n sharma have been excellent , infact they both hve done better then kohli in world tournaments in Odi's 

 

U dnt fix what aint broken

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Rahul cnt find a place, pant has no chance in top 3

dhawan n sharma have been excellent , infact they both hve done better then kohli in world tournaments in Odi's 

 

U dnt fix what aint broken

ODIs are fine. I am talking about their low strike rates in T20s. It's similar to Kohli's, and that's 3 accumulators in top 4, where are the hitters. I think KL Rahul will be playing at #3 in T20s with or without Kohli in the side. 

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Lannister said:

ODIs are fine. I am talking about their low strike rates in T20s. It's similar to Kohli's, and that's 3 accumulators in top 4, where are the hitters. I think KL Rahul will be playing at #3 in T20s with or without Kohli in the side. 

 

In t20 we hve to start looking beyond dhawan now 

Rohit shud keep his place as bastman n next captain, rahul shud open with him and pant can bat at 4

 

Dnt change kohli position , he has been our best batsman in Last 3 t20 WC

Pant have done well in IPL in middle, we are jst panicking for no reason......

Link to comment

LOL,Just like Rahul now Pants brain is being screwed. None of the two are out of the world but deserve in playing 11. So if you can screw with their brain, You can get them out i.e impact overall performance. One kid whose brain cant be screwed with politics is  is probably Prithvi Shaw.

 

So lets not select Prithvi despite MoS performance in test series at highest S/R

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
29 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

In t20 we hve to start looking beyond dhawan now 

Rohit shud keep his place as bastman n next captain, rahul shud open with him and pant can bat at 4

 

Dnt change kohli position , he has been our best batsman in Last 3 t20 WC

Pant have done well in IPL in middle, we are jst panicking for no reason......

I think Kohli should open along with Pant, and Rahul to play at #3. Kohli's strike rate will improve playing in powerplays. He will just block others if he gets to bat at #3 and we will be left with par scores like we saw in the last world cup. 

Edited by Lannister
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...