Sid kaul selected for third t20 against WI

[vishalvirsingh]

Bumrah umesh kuldeep rested and Sid selected 

 

If he gets a  chance in 11 then his career is done and dusted

Why is he selected.

 

[Suhaan]

The midget and his thunderbolts

[velu]

 

 

they shld have selected thakur or chahar atleast

[velu]

@BrantFUGH bhai .. are you a bot or human ?

if you are not a bot , give me "heartin" for this post 

[Nikola]

1 minute ago, velu said:

@BrantFUGH bhai .. are you a bot or human ?

if you are not a bot , give me "heartin" for this post 

There are few accounts which are starting to give me troll for old posts in 3rd or 4th odi of windies match. As mod you should be able to find and fix this issue. Either bot/multi accounter is deliberately doing this.

[rkt.india]

6 minutes ago, velu said:

 

 

they shld have selected thakur or chahar atleast

[rkt.india]

Just now, Nikola said:

There are few accounts which are starting to give me troll for old posts in 3rd or 4th odi of windies match. As mod you should be able to find and fix this issue. Either bot/multi accounter is deliberately doing this.

mods cant ban.  it is up to admins.

[Nikola]

Just now, rkt.india said:

mods cant ban.  it is up to admins.

yeah but there are few random accounts doing such stuff and all are new so it's bot or someone is doing it manually. Mods can report this to admins.

[rkt.india]

8 minutes ago, Nikola said:

yeah but there are few random accounts doing such stuff and all are new so it's bot or someone is doing it manually. Mods can report this to admins.

already reported

[velu]

10 minutes ago, Nikola said:

There are few accounts which are starting to give me troll for old posts in 3rd or 4th odi of windies match. As mod you should be able to find and fix this issue. Either bot/multi accounter is deliberately doing this.

 

there are 3/4 bots i guess ..

it randomly gives votes and it is digging 6 months old IPL match threads as well  

 

admins marked as spam , but it can still vote .. need to delete or remove their accounts

[Global.Baba]

1 minute ago, velu said:

 

there are 3/4 bots i guess ..

it randomly gives votes and it is digging 6 months old IPL match threads as well  

 

admins marked as spam , but it can still vote .. need to delete or remove their accounts

I am only getting upvotes. So no complaints

 

[The Dark Horse]

8 minutes ago, velu said:

 

there are 3/4 bots i guess ..

it randomly gives votes and it is digging 6 months old IPL match threads as well  

 

admins marked as spam , but it can still vote .. need to delete or remove their accounts

Sathiya sodhanai

[express bowling]

Is there a quota for trundlers these days  ?

 

They have to be given X  number of matches  even though standard pacers are available  ?

 

They are not playable in " live " rubbers  ...  so play them in dead rubbers or inconsequential matches.  Same thing happened in the the Asia Cup.

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Wud love to have Mavi for this game

 

But as i said selectors have decided - kaul, thakur, chahar, unadkat, dhawal are their WC backups so they will be given games here n there to give them exp........

 

No point  now discussing about new Fast bowlers for WC

[Suhaan]

1 hour ago, velu said:

 

 

they shld have selected thakur or chahar atleast

That will set icf on fire

[express bowling]

Really want to see Kaul, Unadkat, Chahar and Dhawal bowl

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

for their state teams ...  and far away from our national team.

 

[Lannister]

Atleast, they didn't select Kaul for ODI series based on his IPL form. That's an improvement, I guess. 

[Global.Baba]

Let me play the devils advocate here for a moment at the expense of receiving hate from speed fans

 

Facts - yes Kaul is a trundler with no upside

 

at the same time Krunall checks a lot of boxes as a lower order hitter who can bowl and has a lot more upside from a future perspective

 

However Kaul has performed well in 2 back to back IPLs just like Krunall

 

On one hand we want Krunall Pandya who  is a top IPL performer based on talent but at the same time have issues with Kaul and Chahar’s selections.

 

As fans we can see most times who has it and who doesn’t however as professional selectors you have to draw the line somewhere.

 

If IPL is being considered as a benchmark for selections then Kaul is also fairly rewarded just like Krunall is.

 

Talent is subjective, we all  have different  opinion on each players which is fine but selectors can’t work like that. 

 

Take the example of Siraj, we all see him as a special talent but he is not a good T20 bowler. Same goes for Umesh and Shami. Selectors have to also start somewhere.

 

Yes picking proven failures like Unadkut is obviously a poor decision regardless of him flattering in IPL as we know we have been duped many times.

 

However I personally think despite being mediocre for obvious reasons Kaul and even Chahar have earned some chances. What is the point of performing then?

Edited November 9, 2018 by Global.Baba

[rkt.india]

14 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

Let me play the devils advocate here for a moment at the expense of receiving hate from speed fans

 

Facts - yes Kaul is a trundler with no upside

 

at the same time Krunall checks a lot of boxes as a lower order hitter who can bowl and has a lot more upside from a future perspective

 

However Kaul has performed well in 2 back to back IPLs just like Krunall

 

On one hand we want Krunall Pandya who  is a top IPL performer based on talent but at the same time have issues with Kaul and Chahar’s selections.

 

As fans we can see most times who has it and who doesn’t however as professional selectors you have to draw the line somewhere.

 

If IPL is being considered as a benchmark for selections then Kaul is also fairly rewarded just like Krunall is.

 

Talent is subjective, we all  have different  opinion on each players which is fine but selectors can’t work like that. 

 

Take the example of Siraj, we all see him as a special talent but he is not a good T20 bowler. Same goes for Umesh and Shami. Selectors have to also start somewhere.

 

Yes picking proven failures like Unadkut is obviously a poor decision regardless of him flattering in IPL as we know we have been duped many times.

 

However I personally think despite being mediocre for obvious reasons Kaul and even Chahar have earned some chances. What is the point of performing then?

It is T20, so he can work.  no problem with his selection.  Problem is if they again select him for ODIs where he has 0 wickets after 3 matches with an ER of 6.6.

[express bowling]

5 hours ago, Global.Baba said:

Let me play the devils advocate here for a moment at the expense of receiving hate from speed fans

 

Facts - yes Kaul is a trundler with no upside

 

at the same time Krunall checks a lot of boxes as a lower order hitter who can bowl and has a lot more upside from a future perspective

 

However Kaul has performed well in 2 back to back IPLs just like Krunall

 

On one hand we want Krunall Pandya who  is a top IPL performer based on talent but at the same time have issues with Kaul and Chahar’s selections.

 

As fans we can see most times who has it and who doesn’t however as professional selectors you have to draw the line somewhere.

 

If IPL is being considered as a benchmark for selections then Kaul is also fairly rewarded just like Krunall is.

 

Talent is subjective, we all  have different  opinion on each players which is fine but selectors can’t work like that. 

 

Take the example of Siraj, we all see him as a special talent but he is not a good T20 bowler. Same goes for Umesh and Shami. Selectors have to also start somewhere.

 

Yes picking proven failures like Unadkut is obviously a poor decision regardless of him flattering in IPL as we know we have been duped many times.

 

However I personally think despite being mediocre for obvious reasons Kaul and even Chahar have earned some chances. What is the point of performing then?

 

So why are IPL performers like Ankit Rajpoot, Surya Yadav or Shreyas Gopal being ignored then   ?

 

Or long term IPL performers like Utthappa, Chawla or Mishra ignored  ?

 

Or  F.C. beast pacers like Joginder Sharma or Vinay Kumar not picked for tests  ?

 

Clearly, performance has not been and has never been the sole parameter for selection.  (  And neither can it be )

Edited November 9, 2018 by express bowling