Ind ATG 11 batting

[Jimmy Cliff]

9 hours ago, zen said:

If we know how test matches work, the strategies you use to score, etc., then there is not much to explain is it 

 

And to create some more sleepless nights for you:

 

View overall figures [change view]

Primary team India  or West Indies

Opposition team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka or West Indies

Involving any of the players AA Donald (SA)  or GD McGrath (AUS)  or M Muralitharan (ICC/SL)  or SM Pollock (SA) or Waqar Younis (PAK)  or SK Warne (AUS)  or Wasim Akram (PAK)

Ordered by runs scored (descending)

Page 1 of 4

Showing 1 - 50 of 168

First Previous

Next  Last

Return to query menu Cleared query menu

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	100	50	0
BC Lara (WI)	1990-2005	58	108	3	5253	277	50.02	14	22	6
SR Tendulkar (INDIA)	1989-2010	58	97	5	3995	177	43.42	14	16	6

 

Tendulkar needs 1258 runs more in 11 innings

 

If you know how Test series work, it shouldn't be too hard to explain that runs scored in live Tests mean much more than the ones in dead rubbers. If doing far better in dead rubbers compared to live Tests was part of a strategy then it must have been a pretty atrocious strategy in the first place . And it has been proved clear cut that against the great ATG pairs of the 90s overall, Tendulkar >> Lara comfortably in live Tests. Even in terms of their overall records against non-minnows in live Tests,

 

Tendulkar has 13K+ runs at 51+

Lara has 9K+ runs at 48+

 

None of that is gonna change no matter how many dodgy filters you use on Statsguru leaving out specific bowlers for strategic reasons .

[zen]

4 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

The All Time India XI was just an excuse. The OP wanted to take a dump on Indian batsmen's (mostly Tendulkar) record while using inconsistent filters against different sides . Too bad it backfired badly like that useless Avg*SR stat in the other thread.

I understand that Tendulkar may have brought some joy to your life. And you may feel that you owe him something and have to defend him in every thread .... But assuming that every thread is a conspiracy (and when one can just start a Lara vs Tendulkar thread to discuss the topic if needed) is dumb .... would recommend getting your head checked for the paranoia 

 

On the Indian batsmen collectively, I do feel that we should have at least lost less, considering we had many of our ATGs playing together, which is why it is being discussed .... Again no reason for you to act as if your pants are on fire when such topics are discussed

 

 

3 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

If you know how Test series work, it shouldn't be too hard to explain that runs scored in live Tests mean much more than the ones in dead rubbers. If doing far better in dead rubbers compared to live Tests was part of a strategy then it must have been a pretty atrocious strategy in the first place . And it has been proved clear cut that against the great ATG pairs of the 90s overall, Tendulkar >> Lara comfortably in live Tests. Even in terms of their overall records against non-minnows in live Tests,

 

Tendulkar has 13K+ runs at 51+

Lara has 9K+ runs at 48+

 

None of that is gonna change no matter how many dodgy filters you use on Statsguru leaving out specific bowlers for strategic reasons .

Keep dreaming!   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

double post

 

 

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

WI ATG 11, probably the strongest along with Aus and SA's 

 

Haynes

Greenidge

Richards

Lara

Sobers

Lloyd

Dujon

Marshall

Ambrose

Holding

Garner

12 man: Gibbs, if a spinner is needed

[CSK Fan]

Always remember, OP is the inventor of RPT to bring sachin down. There is no amount of ridiculousness or tactics he will try for this end

[CSK Fan]

Always remember, OP is the inventor of RPT to bring sachin down. There is no amount of ridiculousness or tactics he will try for this end

[zen]

double post

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

9 minutes ago, CSK Fan said:

Always remember, OP is the inventor of RPT to bring sachin down. There is no amount of ridiculousness or tactics he will try for this end

nothing like adding all international runs and 100 to show that it equals an avg of 100  

 

what's next? are you going to add Bhuvi's 5-fers?

 

heights of hero worshipping

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[Jimmy Cliff]

19 minutes ago, zen said:

I understand that Tendulkar may have brought some joy to your life. And you feel that you owe him something and have to defend him in every thread .... But assuming that every thread is a conspiracy (and when one can just start a Lara vs Tendulkar thread to discuss the topic if needed) is dumb .... would recommend getting your head checked for the paranoia 

 

On the Indian batsmen collectively, I do feel that we should have at least lost less, considering we had many of our ATGs playing together .... I do not see any reasons for you (or anyone) to get personal on this (even if it includes Tendulkar)

 

btw, the guy you replied to has been blocked by me (and has been trying hard to get in to a conversation with me since a long time). Since you quoted him, I had to read his post 

I understand that your nonsensical Avg*SR stat in Tests getting mocked at in the other thread pissed you off and led to the creation of this thread. A bit desperate and pathetic but still understandable.

 

However, if I feel that the filters in this thread were dubiously selected then I will call it out. If you think that's getting "personal" then so be it. If you are incapable for making for a case for Lara without resorting to inconsistent filters and poorly researched claims that's not my problem. 

 

41 minutes ago, zen said:

Keep dreaming!

Yeah this article at Cricinfo is something I wrote in my dreams .

 

Batsmen have boosted their career records by scoring heavily in matches inconsequential to the series

 

 

 

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

 

 

 

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

 

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen

[zen]

del

Edited December 16, 2018 by zen