Jump to content
Trichromatic

Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul suspended pending inquiry for their comments in Koffee with Karan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, velu said:

and tamil culture is little more conservative when compared with overall indian culture 

That is a generalisation

 

Traditional is not the same as conservative.

 

You think Rajasthan, haryana etc are not conservative.

 

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

They weren't risking anything. Pandya has a board above him.

 

Pandya is not an established cricketer yet. 

 

my next concern is bcci should not get involved in players personal lives ..

and whther pandya is established or not , he will be responsible for how he develops .. 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, maniac said:

That is the same excuse Pakistanis use for

Amir’s fixing lol.

Kaha fixing aur kaha ye

Just now, maniac said:

 

Didn’t  Bumrah make debut at the same time? 

What part of it didnt u understand that 2 ppl are diff from each other
Why isnt rohit  or anyone as hardworking as kohl ????? 2 diff personalities 

why doesnt kohli act like dhoni under pressure or vice versa???? 2 diff ppl 

Why dont u post like @velu ????? 2 diff personalities

Why didnt sehwag play like dravid or vice versa ??? 2 diff personality

 

Let orange be orange n apples be apples

Just now, maniac said:

 

Even Rahul looks relatively down to earth

Let rahul be rahul and pandya be pandya 

 

A question- was everyone in ur class like same types ?? all good boys or all bad boys 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, velu said:

 

my next concern is bcci should not get involved in players personal lives ..

and whther pandya is established or not , he will be responsible for how he develops .. 

BCCI has no right to get involved in someone’s personal life totally agree but they can get involved if someone is spewing crap in public and it gives them a bad name.

 

If Pandya dates a cheerleader or passes a comment about how pretty they are that’s a different thing than saying he can bed any cheerleader he wants, that reflects on the BCCI.

 

Amazing how you are not able to separate the 2.

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, beetle said:

That is a generalisation

 

Traditional is not the same as conservative.

 

You think Rajasthan, haryana etc are not conservative.

 

 

im.. 

still people didnt bother much about what he said ..

as i said earlier , people who are cribbing about his intervie in the media are cribbing just because they  think that  many got offended 

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

again ur asking 2 ppl to be same, doesnt happen 

 

vicky kaushal is a diff personality 

Ranvir singh very diff

Ranbir very diff 

ayushaman has been in media for almost a decade now infact way more...so he knws how to handle them

hardik has come in limelight for 2-3 yrs......

 

All are diff personalities.....life and even sports wud be boring with same type of characters

People are called what they show to the world.

If people act like gentlemen,they are called gentlemen.

If they act like creeps,they are called creeps.

 

A guy like Ranbir is called out for being a womaniser .

Ayushman is a gentleman .

Hardik is a creep.

 

Agree different personalities . The point is why are you offended when he is being called a creep.

If he acts like one, he will be called one.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, maniac said:

What no right ..so we cannot judge if a person hasn been articulate or came across like a chewt based on a public interview?

 

we can judge abt pandya here .. no issues

but why we should get offended if someone is a chewt .. we can ridicule him about what he said ( like what he things abt cool , west indianess etc ) butif someone get offended then its not pandyas problem

Share this post


Link to post
7 minutes ago, velu said:

 

my next concern is bcci should not get involved in players personal lives ..

 and whther pandya is established or not , he will be responsible for how he develops .. 

First it's their public life. 

 

2nd BCCI won't get involved, they can skip the contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, maniac said:

BCCI has no right to get involved in someone’s personal life totally agree but they can get involved if someone is spewing crap in public and it gives them a bad name.

 

If Pandya dates a cheerleader or passes a comment about how pretty they are that’s a different thing than saying he can bed any cheerleader he wants, that reflects on the BCCI.

 

Amazing how you are not able to separate the 2.

 

pandya was crapping himself and not bcci ..

 

no .. pandya never said that he can bed any cheerleader if he wants ..

what he said was he banged good amount of women and he is a chick magnet .. most of his comments are like me , me , me .. he was creepy but nothing warrants his head 

Share this post


Link to post
5 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Kaha fixing aur kaha ye

What part of it didnt u understand that 2 ppl are diff from each other
Why isnt rohit  or anyone as hardworking as kohl ????? 2 diff personalities 

why doesnt kohli act like dhoni under pressure or vice versa???? 2 diff ppl 

Why dont u post like @velu ????? 2 diff personalities

Why didnt sehwag play like dravid or vice versa ??? 2 diff personality

 

Let orange be orange n apples be apples

Let rahul be rahul and pandya be pandya 

 

A question- was everyone in ur class like same types ?? all good boys or all bad boys 

Kohli is called hardworking and Rohit is called lazy based on their actions and personalities.

 

Obviously...hardworking is better than lazy .

Similarly creepy and vulgar is not nice .

Yes....there are different kinds of personalities ....all are not same .

But some are just bad and they are called so.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, beetle said:

People are called what they show to the world.

If people act like gentlemen,they are called gentlemen.

If they act like creeps,they are called creeps.

 

A guy like Ranbir is called out for being a womaniser .

Ayushman is a gentleman .

Hardik is a creep.

 

Agree different personalities . The point is why are you offended when he is being called a creep.

If he acts like one, he will be called one.

 

 

Let them decide what they wanna be ....public opinion changes very day

 

yahi public hai kal ko 3-4 match pandya jeetaga to bolegi ki kya dude hai banda

Yahi public salman ko 1 din criminal bolti hia , agle din charity krne wala mahaan vyakti

Same public called ayushman failure 2 yrs ago and didnt care if he is a gentlemen or not

Same public called ranbir arrogant when his films were bombing and some were even saying he got karma coz he cheated on many women

 

1 mnth men sab bhul jate, what remains with u in life is being urself .why to change for ppl who changes ur opinion eveyrday 

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, beetle said:

Kohli is called hardworking and Rohit is called lazy based on their actions and personalities.

 

Obviously...hardworking is better than lazy .

Similarly creepy and vulgar is not nice .

Yes....there are different kinds of personalities ....all are not same .

But some are just bad and they are called so.

 

pandya is creepy , vulgar and cheap .. but why audience is getting offended that i dont know 

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, velu said:

 

pandya was crapping himself and not bcci ..

 

no .. pandya never said that he can bed any cheerleader if he wants ..

what he said was he banged good amount of women and he is a chick magnet .. most of his comments are like me , me , me .. he was creepy but nothing warrants his head 

Sure I don’t think he should be banned for this either. His comments were irresponsible though.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, beetle said:

Kohli is called hardworking and Rohit is called lazy based on their actions and personalities.

 

Obviously...hardworking is better than lazy .

Similarly creepy and vulgar is not nice .

Yes....there are different kinds of personalities ....all are not same .

But some are just bad and they are called so.

creep n vulgar apne decide kr lia....has any girl come n complained about it who he has done that to

If not m sure they are finding it ok.......then who are we to say anything

If a girl says she finds his behavior towards her creep .........ill say punish him

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, velu said:

 

pandya is creepy , vulgar and cheap .. but why audience is getting offended that i dont know 

They are just calling him that.

He put himself out there for them to judge him and they are doing that.

 

Don't confuse the ones calling him creep with the ones who got offended by choosing virat over sachin .:p:

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, velu said:

so for the  indian public , salman khan who killed few people in a hit and run case , hunted endangered animals is human and support his cause by buying  his overpriced "being human" brand is role model bhai..

but pandya who boasted about his success with women is a villain :lol: 

kyunki bhai claims he is virgin

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

creep n vulgar apne decide kr lia....has any girl come n complained about it who he has done that to

If not m sure they are finding it ok.......then who are we to say anything

If a girl says she finds his behavior towards her creep .........ill say punish him

 

 

He talks about women like they are furniture to sit on. 

 

If people spit on the road and no one complains ,does that make that behavior fine?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

yea not a part of moral policing neither i wanna be 

Go analyze Dhoni bhai’s triggers, that’s the only thing you can comprehend.

 

Is anyone having a problem with  Pandya’s sex life or are they pointing out how idiotic comments on a public platform are :facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, velu said:

so for the  indian public , salman khan who killed few people in a hit and run case , hunted endangered animals is human and support his cause by buying  his overpriced "being human" brand is role model bhai..

but pandya who boasted about his success with women is a villain :lol: 

Who really thinks Salman is a role model in real life?

Salman is known for his murder of humans and deer.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, beetle said:

He talks about women like they are furniture to sit on. 

where did he say or mean that ???

1 minute ago, beetle said:

 

If people spit on the road and no one complains ,does that make that behavior fine?

spitting is destroying public property for which we pay tax

who got destroyed here???

A girl he hits on is ok with it ....so is he ?? problem is of 3rd party

 

Public hypocrisy is such when tanushree dutta said she found nana patekar behaviour creep many didnt beilve. Here no girl has said anything who has had encounter with him........dusre log kyun chaudhary ban rhe hai. M all up for bashin him if a girl comes n say he he was creep n vulgar to her.......punish him right there

 

 but here no one has gotten hurt apart from our sensative feelings 

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, maniac said:

Go analyze Dhoni bhai’s triggers, that’s the only thing you can comprehend.

 

Is anyone having a problem with  Pandya’s sex life or are they pointing out how idiotic comments on a public platform are :facepalm:

That what happens when u have no point left to argue a person resorts to trolling. 

 

idiotic comment- moral science ki kitaab likhi hia aapne

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

where did he say or mean that ???

spitting is destroying public property for which we pay tax

who got destroyed here???

A girl he hits on is ok with it ....so is he ?? problem is of 3rd party

 

Public hypocrisy is such when tanushree dutta said she found nana patekar behaviour creep many didnt beilve. Here no girl has said anything who has had encounter with him........dusre log kyun chaudhary ban rhe hai. M all up for bashin him if a girl comes n say he he was creep n vulgar to her.......punish him right there

 

 but here no one has gotten hurt apart from our sensative feelings 

You think talking about women like they are for sex objects is not harmful like destroying public property?

..that too by public figure ...

 

Ladki hogi to bolegi...

 

Most likely this guy is just talking bullshit to appear like a stud...but why talk in such a vulgar and cheap manner?

 

Point is.....why do you have a problem with people giving their opinion?

He acted like a creep and people are calling him that.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Vilander said:

:facepalm:

just for the record, he is not a typical kannadiga folks. Kannadigas are pretty welcoming people who are non clanish for the most part, vattal nagaraju is fringe or fringe. 

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said:

His family look like typical middle class parents.... his claims about his mom being that open with his sex life BS.

 

Also to the posters who are saying that people are over sensitive and we shouldnt judge other's lifestyle choices... this reeks of  hypocrisy. Would they be ok with their sisters talking about losing their virginities at home with her parents ( example Smriti Mandhana a hypothetical example of a young indian sportswoman) or her telling her parents how many guys has she bedded in a party??

 

I am all for openness and liberalisation of some aspects of our backward culture and views but why is it modern when a guy does it and a shame when a woman does it?

Very true. People who accept this bs that pandya was spewing " that  mom dad aaj mai kar k aaya hun"  on the name of open culture would not do themselves. It's just that pandya is tool and bit like sreesanth. No body wants you to be like sachin or dravid but atleast he should have sense while speaking on national channel. I m all for openness but do we accept the same bullshit if our gf, wife or sis ll do this.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, maniac said:

Most common public unfortunately equate Cheerleaders with escorts. As dumb as the whole cheerleading thing is in US cheerleaders get sport scholarships just like players.

 

Pandya is such a gaon vaala. Surprised no

metoo on him yet. Anyways I think he is all talk and a phattu in real life. Look at Shami bhai. Never boasts or displays it. asli Mard ko dard nahi hota 

i think its sexist but they have sport as an option as well. but ind copiying it without actual cheerleaders is cringe-worthy sexism.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, maniac said:

Saying that he slept with all the IPL cheerleaders is cool? Are you one of those people who think every good looking white woman is a slut or pornstar?

 

He is just trying to be Chris Gayle. Even Gayle is hated for such behavior even though he is not as crude as Pandya  and a much greater cricketer than this 2 takey ka player.

 

Look at someone like Bumrah and how well he speaks. Even Shami kept his personal affairs under the radar even though he probably sleeps with as many women in a day ( obviously paying for it) than  Pandya has in his entire life span.

 

I think he is trying to be like some soccer players or even WI players but it doesn’t come natural.

 

From Pataudi to Gavaskar to Sachin to Dhoni to Virat look how they carry themselves.

 

This is disgusting behavior. Unbelievable you think this is cool

+1There are lot of guys in living or make out with girls but there is nothing to boast abt especially to ur parents that aaj mai thok k aaya hun. This is utter level chutiyapa and not honesty.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

actually

its a knwn secret that the franchise owners provide these girls to most cricketers .....

Are u sure abt this comment like this bring bcci in tough spot?... Thankfully moron pandya dint say it.

Share this post


Link to post

Pandya is the closest we have to a Pakistani cricketer. Someone picked out of the blue outiside of the system for his apparent tailunt. Some one who fans love because he can slog a few and hit a few deliveries at 140ks. Someone who has trendy yuppie hairstyles. Someone who comes across a total villager in an interview setting.

 

Dil Dil Pandya

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, beetle said:

That is a sad generalisation.

Cheerleading is a profession.

They are not prostitutes.

 

It is one thing to hook up with some one for fun but words like ' provide girls' is not right.

 

A lot of people make such statements for models and actresses too.

A few decades back,cabin crew and nurses were also generalised like this.

 

 

 

Ankit is talking abt openness and subconsciously stereotyping cheerleadin profession as brothel service.

Share this post


Link to post
58 minutes ago, velu said:

 

whatever the answer i give , how it is offensive to other posters ?

 

you guys are missing the point here .. whatever be the person pandya is , audience has no right about how pandya should conduct himself as long as it is not affecting others 

But they do have a right to call him out for his behavior.

Like if he is well behaved...then say...kitna well behaved bachcha hai.

Similarly....when he is a tool...then say...kitna chichora hai....

 

 

Like you can troll....but if you troll, hum bolenge troll hai....:p:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Ankit is talking abt openness and subconsciously stereotyping cheerleadin profession as brothel service.

Looks like “moral policing” was the dictionary word he rattafied today skipping many other key words like “village idiot” “common sense” “dignity” etc etc

Share this post


Link to post

I have not watched the show and probably will not watch it .... What I know is that KL and Pandya said Kohli is a better batsman and Dhoni a better captain vs those these two were compared with 

 

The issue could be that there are a lot of bekar and undereducated folks in India who have a lot of time on their hands. They probably watch a lot of such shows and try to make mountains out of molehills (Padmaavati controversy for e.g.) 

 

On Pandya, he is probably too westernized. And many hate him for being successful and better than their favourite cricketers. These guys will go out of the way to support a glorified night watchman like Vihari over Pandya for e.g. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, zen said:

I have not watched the show and probably will not watch it .... What I know is that KL and Pandya said Kohli is a better batsman and Dhoni a better captain vs those these two were compared with 

 

The issue could be that there are a lot of bekar and undereducated folks in India who have a lot of time on their hands. They probably watch a lot of such shows and try to make mountains out of molehills (Padmaavati controversy for e.g.) 

 

On Pandya, he is probably too westernized. And many hate him for being successful and better than their favourite cricketers. These guys will go out of the way to support a glorified night watchman like Vihari over Pandya for e.g. :lol:

Baroda ke gully mohalle mein khel ke westernized ho gaya. Kya baat hai :hatsoff:

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, maniac said:

Baroda ke gully mohalle mein khel ke westernized ho gaya. Kya baat hai :hatsoff:

Baroda is multi cultural. Also a lot of folks from overseas including NRIs visit it every year. Many attend its universities too from all over India / abroad. People from Baroda also travel a lot abroad. There are movie studios too .... it is one of the cities in Ind where you can get westernized 

 

Edited by zen

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×