Jump to content

India to stop water supply to Pakistan


vayuu1

Recommended Posts

LIVE
image
image
MASSIVE: India to stop water flow to Pakistan; will use supply to benefit people of J&K and Punjab, tweets Nitin Gadkari
 
 
 
 
21-02-2019 06:39 pm
 
 

In a massive announcement, Union Water resources, River development and water resources minister Nitin Gadkari has tweeted that the Modi government has decided to stop the share of water that used to flow into Pakistan and divert it for the use of people in J&K and the Punjab.

Taking to Twitter, Gadkari, who had also spoken of the impending move earlier in the day when he said that the water from three rivers flowing into Pakistan would be used to nurture the Yamuna, has written:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maniac said:
#WATCH Union Minister Nitin Gadkari says,"Bharat aur Pakistan hone ke baad, jo humari 3 nadiyan Pakistan ko mili thi aur 3 Bharat ko mili thi. Humare teen nadiyon ke adhikar ka paani Pak mein ja raha tha, ab uss par 3 project karke yeh paani bhi Yamuna mein wapas la rahe hain." pic.twitter.com/w6EfYi3…
 
:hmmmm:

It was basically India's share of water.

Another chutiapa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

It was basically India's share of water.

Another chutiapa.

Let me know if my interpretation is correct

 

From what I understood, Pak already has water from 3 rivers I believe according to existing treaties (Indus Water?),

 

The water from 3 rivers India got,some surplus goes to Pakistan and has been for a while. Now they want to start building a project that might take a few years to divert the flow of water.

 

Is that right?

 

If so this is dumb. so Pakistan has water from 3 rivers+some surplus all these days? Our leaders have screwed this country for too long by being pussies and suckups to Pakistan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Tibarn said:

It is chutiyapa for sure, but it is a welcome step. How in the world were we even giving our legal share to the Bakistanis?

 

India needs to scrap the whole IWT treaty however. That would be a death blow.  

There are at least 5-6  decisive moves the govt. could have taken without starting an actual artillery war since the attacks.

 

It has been a week since then, and nothing has happened.

 

The problem is we have to choose between an indecisive govt. (BJP) vs a anti-national govt.(Congress+gatbandhan jokers) while it looks like it is not a difficult choice,still Indian public is becoming the chewtiya at a higher level.

Edited by maniac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stradlater said:

Are they stopping Pakistan's share of water to pass through? 

If not then another jumla from BJP.

1, Indus river flows for 70-75% of its length in Pakistan. some 20-25% in India and probably 5-10 % in China. Riparian state water sharing norms are based on this.

 

2, To stop 80% of water flow of Indus , India would have to construct like what ~100 dams across 6 rivers in a 150000 sq km area 

 

so what do you think is happening now ? or what do you think can happen ever

 

Indian share of the rivers beas ravi and sutlej would probably be dammed further now, thats it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, maniac said:

There are at least 5-6  decisive moves the govt. could have taken without starting an actual artillery war since the attacks.

 

It has been a week since then, and nothing has happened.

 

The problem is we have to choose between an indecisive govt. (BJP) vs a anti-national govt. while it looks like it is not a difficult choice,still Indian public is becoming the chewtiya at a higher level.

The way I am seeing things: there are usually 3 non-military options people usually repeat whenever the Bakistanis usually do their usual stuff:  1) Scrap IWT, 2) Repeal 370, 3) Remove MFN status 

 

The government has done the 3rd. One can see on twitter that some of the padosis are bothered by it. 

 

The 2nd one, some BJP leaders are making noise about it. We will see if it takes action or if they are indeed an indecisive government which, like you posted in the other thread, wasted 330 seat-strong government. They have a chance to do it, we will see, it is not something done as quick as we all would want. 

 

The 1st one is actually the most drastic action a government can take, according to some, outside of actually using nuclear weapons. It is more drastic than non-nuclear war possibly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...