Jump to content

In trying to take the chase deep, KL Rahul made it impossible - Harsha Bhogle


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

i dont like taking it till the last overs unnecessarily .. if we are chasing a tricky total , then it is fine to play safe ele it will backfire spectacularly

 

another thing about dhoni is, when he is not going for sixes he plays the shot along the ground ( aka sachinesque )  .. but rahul plays many lofted shots which might backfire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, velu said:

i dont like taking it till the last overs unnecessarily .. if we are chasing a tricky total , then it is fine to play safe ele it will backfire spectacularly

 

another thing about dhoni is, when he is not going for sixes he plays the shot along the ground ( aka sachinesque )  .. but rahul plays many lofted shots which might backfire

I understand. But he is a lot more selective compared to what he was sometime back. So there is some improvement which will help us in one dayer. But this strategy is a fail strategy in T20 especially while chasing 180 plus total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

I understand. But he is a lot more selective compared to what he was sometime back. So there is some improvement which will help us in one dayer. But this strategy is a fail strategy in T20 especially while chasing 180 plus total.

 

ideal strategy in T20 when chasing is that of watsons ..

score normally against  good bowlers , when you see weak bowlers murder them :lol: 

 

tuk tuking in the middle will give the Opposition captain to sue their part timers in the middle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should try to chase as if you have an over less to account for unwanted pressure situation. If it is T20, chase as if it is 19. If it is 50, case as if it is 49 

 

Also you should be looking to go after 5th and 6th bowlers. At the end, you get to play death over specialists esp. vs major teams. If you get out, it is difficult for new batsmen to go after the key bowlers (and you would have lost the opportunity to go after 5th and 6th bowlers as well)

 

Batting deep concept is designed by those who probably want to secure a decent batting average first before taking any risks for their team 

 

However, batting deep can be ok in circumstances where you have lost a bunch of wkts and do not have enough resources available to put pressure on the bowlers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Honestly i am super happy about the new approach of KL Rahul. It is highly productive in a one dayer. Take 3 or 4 overs ease yourself into the innings and go for big shots as the game goes along.

You are judged by how you adjust to a particular format. SRs in general of batsmen are lower in ODIs than in T20s. You can’t play like ODIs in T20s. What is transferable is form, confidence, etc 

 

Note that if everyone takes 3-4 overs to get going, and if a team loses 5-6 wkts, you can do your math on how much it can hurt a team 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zen said:

You are judged by how you adjust to a particular format. SRs in general of batsmen are lower in ODIs than in T20s. You can’t play like ODIs in T20s. What is transferable is form, confidence, etc 

 

Note that if everyone takes 3-4 overs to get going, and if a team loses 5-6 wkts, you can do your math on how much it can hurt a team 

 

We are talking about in the early stages of the match. Not last 10 overs. In the last 10 overs you have to take more risks. If the score if 50/5 what do you suggest  Keep attacking? No.  Team like India cannot afford to lose their 6th wicket before 48th over given their woeful depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

We are talking about in the early stages of the match. Not last 10 overs. In the last 10 overs you have to take more risks. If the score if 50/5 what do you suggest  Keep attacking? No.  Team like India cannot afford to lose their 6th wicket before 48th over given their woeful depth.

No batsman can afford to eat up 3-4 overs single handedly in PPs. You have to keep looking for and creating scoring opportunities. As a team, may be at times, you can take a couple of overs vs good bowling sides or to assess the conditions if unsure

 

I do not know how you came up with 50/5 number and then merged the idea that attacking is bad at that stage. It all depends upon the conditions, who is bowling, who is batting, etc. Attacking does not mean playing rash shots. If it is a batting friendly surface, the idea is not to get to a 200 total on a 300 pitch. On the other hand, If the conditions are bowler friendly, you would play accordingly working yourself towards what a good total is 

 

There are no black and white concepts where if you attack you get out and vice versa. And where attacking equals playing rash shots only

 

If a bowler is bowling well, you play accordingly. If a bowler is bowling ok, you take him cleaners

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am generally ok with batsmen taking their time while chasing , but with a lot of conditions . You go steady only if you lose early wickets . If you chose to play like this then you have to see it through.  KL will be fine if he can take this approach playing in the middle order , but as an opener he cannot waste pps .

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jusarrived said:

Am generally ok with batsmen taking their time while chasing , but with a lot of conditions . You go steady only if you lose early wickets . If you chose to play like this then you have to see it through.  KL will be fine if he can take this approach playing in the middle order , but as an opener he cannot waste pps .

 

 

That depends on condition, what you chase if you bat second, what kind of bowlers bowl. Let us say Dale steyn and Rabada are bowling 5 overs each. Is it worth throwing the bat around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, velu said:

 

ideal strategy in T20 when chasing is that of watsons ..

score normally against  good bowlers , when you see weak bowlers murder them :lol: 

 

tuk tuking in the middle will give the Opposition captain to sue their part timers in the middle 

Wait are you talking about KL or the person who was booed by a large Indian crowd last year in England :hmmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stan AF said:

Its very clear that KL Rahul is playing for his WC spot and is treating IPL as a launchpad to improve his ODI form.

He has joined bunty sajdeh super agent who manages VK and is related to hitman. Mark my words he will play no.3 and vk will drop to no.4 to accomodate him. he has accomodated hitman in tests previosuly by batting up and dropping pujara

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

He has joined bunty sajdeh super agent who manages VK and is related to hitman. Mark my words he will play no.3 and vk will drop to no.4 to accomodate him. he has accomodated hitman in tests previosuly by batting up and dropping pujara

That is a bad idea man.. VK dropping to #4. it is equivalent of killing a golden goose. It's his best run scoring position. 

 

KL Rahul can still bat at 4 and do good to the team. What is this obsession of young players wanting to play in top 3?. I never understand that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...