Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Gollum

Al Jazeera

Recommended Posts

Simple question, why isn't it banned in India? Why is AJ Indian Bureau not shut down?

 

So many hit jobs on India, pro-Pak bias clearly visible, every article is an agenda piece to defame our country and her majority community, last refuge for out of job scoundrels in journalism like Teesta, Rana Ayyub, Aakar, Mander, Noorani etc. And I have also noticed them giving space to Urban Naxals more recently. 

 

They call Kashmiri jihadis fighters/gunmen or sometimes freedom fighters, misrepresent the Kashmir insurgency, show the wrong map of India (very common), run down every single Indian achievement, promote crazy conspiracy theories and lie, lie, lie. 

 

I seriously hope Modi bans that Islamist mouthpiece in his 2nd term, this goes beyond politics. If they show Kashmir, Arunachal, Andaman, Lakshadweep as not part of India, this **** isn't a BJP or Congress specific problem anymore, it is an attack on the nation. 

 

Always hated those assholes, saw a recent video shared on twitter and that irritated me no end...a senior Indian journo (prime time darling that too) like Saba Naqvi going there and parroting ISI lines. Then there was another garbage piece blaming Hindu extremists for hounding a popular Islamic preacher Zakir Naik :facepalm:...also called Sheikh Hasina a puppet of the fundamentalist Hindutva govt when she banned Peace TV (post Dhaka Holy Artisan Bakery ISIS attack 2 years back). The term 'Hindu' prefixed/suffixed by all sorts of derogatory words but terrorists are gunmen or freedom fighters, WTF !!!

 

 

 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sergio04 said:

yaar inko kaam mil gaya yaha pe

warna yeh kahi bomb fodte

Khud nahi bane toh kya? Inka kaam hai bhadkana, propaganda kar ke kaafi saare suicide bomber taiyyar karenge. Radical Islamic terror is like a cricket team,many departments (jihadis, media, HR activists, lawyers, financial support, logistics etc) and each of the individual units has its predefined role. AJ is doing its job with aplomb and the world is being passive.  

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

They have "bought" players from Africa and EU and made them overnight citizens. It is manufactured. 

What else can they do ,they are a tiny nation and not as athletic as west indians.Other gulf countries also use african origin players.Their striker was pretty good ,can't recall his name.

Edited by MultiB48

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Qataris have got Al Jazeera, Turks have got TRT, Chinese have CCTV then time is ripe for Indians to have their own mouthpiece which caters its viewpoint in the global arena. If Saudis could ban Al-Jazeera then what is the compulsion of Indian govt. for not banning these channels when all they've done is spread anti-India agenda in their every article involving India.

32 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

Got to say Qatar has developed Al Jazeera and it's football team quite nicely.

Last year I read that their national team had only 4 Qatar born players, rest were from other nations including France & Portugal.

Edited by Turning_track

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, First class said:

Indians have all the right to ban any neutral or unbiased TV channel like Al Jazeera of BBC. They should have access only to pro-Indian channels, particularly in the current situation in locked up Kashmir. 

They are not unbiased or neutral channels if you ask me.There specialty is to try and show the other side ..bass ,nothing wrong in that ,but thats bread and butter for AJ .

 

AL Jazeera tries to be centered but it is infact Extreme Left Just like Republic Channel is extreme right .

Edited by Stuge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2019 at 9:46 AM, Turning_track said:

If Qataris have got Al Jazeera, Turks have got TRT, Chinese have CCTV then time is ripe for Indians to have their own mouthpiece which caters its viewpoint in the global arena. If Saudis could ban Al-Jazeera then what is the compulsion of Indian govt. for not banning these channels when all they've done is spread anti-India agenda in their every article involving India.

Last year I read that their national team had only 4 Qatar born players, rest were from other nations including France & Portugal.

Are you really comparing yourself to Saudi? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Pakistan said:

Are you really comparing yourself to Saudi? 

We aren't an apartheid state like Saudi but India needs to act when foreign state TVs keep propagating fake news.

Al-Jazeera is quite adept in that. I'm sure they'd attract more eyeballs if Qatari state TV makes a docu-drama on thousands of desi lives lost in making their FIFA WC 2022 dream true. Instead we see Al Jazeera favoring a certain Islamic preacher Zakir Naik's struggles against the Indian republic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, First class said:

Indians have all the right to ban any neutral or unbiased TV channel like Al Jazeera of BBC. They should have access only to pro-Indian channels, particularly in the current situation in locked up Kashmir. 

:hysterical: 

 

Its hilarious when Pakistanis even try to talk about things like media freedom, or "self-determination".   Your eunuch army is too busy fighting internal political 'wars' - shutting down TV channels if they dare to show 'opposition' politicians.  And btw, here's a little fact for you - According to neutral academic research, "occupied Kashmiris in India have more "freedom" than not only the Kashmiris in Pakistani "Azaad" Kashmir, but also the Pakistanis.  @Pakistan

@KeyboardWarrior

 

 

Stupid greenbros - they are getting looted and exploited by a military mafia whose top commanders are dollar millionaires, but being fooled and distracted by 2 talking points - "corrupt politicians", and "Evil Endia occupying Kashmir".   Did you ever stop and think which puppet-master allows those "corrupt politicians" to get selected into office, and then when the time comes, those civilian stooges are scapegoated as the sole reason for all of Pakistan's troubles.  Same topi drama over and over again, but illiterate greenbros simply not able to recognzie the pattern.  

Edited by sandeep

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking the wrong question, the real question is why there is no global Indian news channels? That's the only way to beat the propaganda. UK, USA, Russia, China, Qatar, they all have it and use it very well.

 

I remember Arnab said same thing 5 years ago, yet we are nowhere in the global arena news platform....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, sandeep said:

:hysterical: 

 

Its hilarious when Pakistanis even try to talk about things like media freedom, or "self-determination".   Your eunuch army is too busy fighting internal political 'wars' - shutting down TV channels if they dare to show 'opposition' politicians.  And btw, here's a little fact for you - According to neutral academic research, "occupied Kashmiris in India have more "freedom" than not only the Kashmiris in Pakistani "Azaad" Kashmir, but also the Pakistanis.  @Pakistan

@KeyboardWarrior

 

 

Stupid greenbros - they are getting looted and exploited by a military mafia whose top commanders are dollar millionaires, but being fooled and distracted by 2 talking points - "corrupt politicians", and "Evil Endia occupying Kashmir".   Did you ever stop and think which puppet-master allows those "corrupt politicians" to get selected into office, and then when the time comes, those civilian stooges are scapegoated as the sole reason for all of Pakistan's troubles.  Same topi drama over and over again, but illiterate greenbros simply not able to recognzie the pattern.  

So true. Army is the state. State of Pakistan narrated by this ex-Atmy jawan. They are f ucked up.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, someone said:

Asking the wrong question, the real question is why there is no global Indian news channels? That's the only way to beat the propaganda. UK, USA, Russia, China, Qatar, they all have it and use it very well.

 

I remember Arnab said same thing 5 years ago, yet we are nowhere in the global arena news platform....

Well instead of putting together a quality media organization, this Arnab clown has decided to make $$ by parodying fox news, ghavthi version. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be made manadatory that Pro government journos and people must be part of discussions on bbc Al jazeera or whatever foreign channels operate in India specially if Subject is down to national security and International affairs. it doesn’t matter who has government ( left or right or centre) in centre. Their should be no discussions without Government side being represented. 

Just day before, person representing indian side on Al Jazeera was Barkha Dutt. The one representing Pakistani side was some Muslim from London and one American lady.

 

 

Edited by mishra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Gollum said:

BBC has joined Jaljeera in the 'Malign India' campaign...

This legend has a point, time to put it into action.

 

Read thos thread on fact findings of the "protests". BBC should be pulled up for fake news.. Facking rabble-rousers. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by coffee_rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People like me do not believe bbc on say Syria or hongkong simply because i know the way they report doom and gloom only when it comes to India or Brexit. BBC reporting is so much biased that we know what they will report in certain matters for which their is so much fact i am aware of. Why should i trust them on news which i am not aware of like Hong Kong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, mishra said:

People like me do not believe bbc on say Syria or hongkong simply because i know the way they report doom and gloom only when it comes to India or Brexit. BBC reporting is so much biased that we know what they will report in certain matters for which their is so much fact i am aware of. Why should i trust them on news which i am not aware of like Hong Kong. 

Every media channel is biased to an extent ...Even your inhouse media channels are biased but there is truth hidden which cannot be denied .

and Just because it doesn't suit what you want to hear you will start calling it biased .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Stuge said:

Every media channel is biased to an extent ...Even your inhouse media channels are biased but there is truth hidden which cannot be denied .

and Just because it doesn't suit what you want to hear you will start calling it biased .

 

Notas simple as you put it. There is a big difference. NDTV for example is expected to be biased. So is Republic tv as they both make money on basis of type of stories they cover.

 

However case of BBC is different. They make money by directly charging a license fee aka tax to whole British population and hence they must represent everyones view or national Interest.  They are supposed to be unbiased and people trusted them too. And then Internet walked in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Stuge said:

^ Nahin hai pasand hai  to maat dekho BBC why so much hue and cry ? 

Pasand ki baat nahi hai. Countering the lies and questioning the credibility is right and responsible thing to do. Let me give a example. Congress said article 370 is abrogation will make Kashmir a Palestine. BBC reports main opposition parties and many people in India think Modi moove will burn allready burning Kashmir. Then they go and record video of some 15-20 youths stone pelting.

and report “Thousands of people protesting against moove and lockdown” to whole world.

Then Congress Diggy uses refernces to same webpage on bbc to claim Kashmir is burning to the people of India. Both conveniently forgot to tell that kasmir is bigger then that one street or their are 12 millions and these 20 people protesting means there is still peace and tranquillity.

 

Its called circle of lies

Edited by mishra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, mishra said:

Pasand ki baat nahi hai. Countering the lies and questioning the credibility is right and responsible thing to do. Let me give a example. Congress said article 370 is abrogation will make Kashmir a Palestine. BBC reports main opposition parties and many people in India think Modi moove will burn allready burning Kashmir. Then they go and record video of some 15-20 youths stone pelting.

and report “Thousands of people protesting against moove and lockdown” to whole world.

Then Congress Diggy uses refernces to same webpage on bbc to claim Kashmir is burning to the people of India. Both conveniently forgot to tell that kasmir is bigger then that one street or their are 12 millions and these 20 people protesting means there is still peace and tranquillity.

 

Its called circle of lies

What do you expect from opposition party ?They are only doing damaged to already damaged reputation .BBC to aake vote karega nahin unko .

 

Edited by Stuge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Stuge said:

 

What do you expect from opposition party ?They are only doing damaged to already damaged reputation .BBC to aake vote karega nahin unko .

 

Very apt and Valid Point.  But, what 90% of Indians also needs to understand the myth that BBC is unbiased and then only they will be able to say "What do you expect from BBC?".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stuge said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Northern_Ireland_border_poll

 

The referendum was boycotted by nationalists and resulted in a conclusive victory for remaining in the UK. On a voter turnout of 58.7 percent, 98.9 percent voted to remain in the UK.

 

But there was violence till much later. Brits better focus on their own issues rather than inventing stories about India. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, mishra said:

Very apt and Valid Point.  But, what 90% of Indians also needs to understand the myth that BBC is unbiased and then only they will be able to say "What do you expect from BBC?".

That's what I have stated above .No media is unbiased you need to be careful while going through news from each media outlet. Everyone caters to their specific crowd for TRPS and viewership.Not to believe anyone blindly.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stuge said:

That's what I have stated above .No media is unbiased you need to be careful while going through news from each media outlet. Everyone caters to their specific crowd for TRPS and viewership.Not to believe anyone blindly.

See, How many English media houses are global?

BBC

CNN

NY Times

Aljazeera

France News

Euronews

CNBC

RT

Fox

ABC

 

Of that BBC has biggest reach and is like messenger of God. Onus is on BBC to remain  messenger of God else on people to let the world know that messenger is passing fabricated message

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, motomaverick said:

The British media is smoking some quality stuff too.

 

Of the 1.1 million British Pakistanis, more than one million originate from the part of Kashmir governed by Pakistan

 

:hysterical:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/11/kashmir-tensions-spill-over-to-britain-pakistani-indian-communities

It is true that majority of  Brit Pakistani are from Mirpur/Gilgit or basically POK. That's why their hate for India is more than that of Pakistanis back home. But yes , not 1 million lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Man! NewsX Journo has completely  teared apart the each and every image in that video posted by BBC and Al Jazeera.

I think BBC and other such media houses will soon have exact same respect as they deserve or get from people like me

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...