Jump to content

Even Pakistan’s lower order >>>> India’s


Recommended Posts

If we look at the performances this yr

 

top 7

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or India remove India from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 1 and 7 remove between 1 and 7 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 5 of 5   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
England 13 9 41 8 1715 150 51.96 1597 107.38 5 11 2 160 57 investigate this query
New Zealand 10 11 67 10 2509 138 44.01 2582 97.17 5 14 0 222 61 investigate this query
Australia 8 13 85 11 3372 153* 45.56 3713 90.81 6 21 5 296 60 investigate this query
South Africa 12 10 55 16 2111 121 54.12 2348 89.90 3 15 2 226 26 investigate this query
India 13 13 81 12 2809 143 40.71 3282 85.58 5 14 8 262 47

 

 

tail

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or India remove India from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position greater than or equal to 8 remove greater than or equal to 8 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 5 of 5   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu

 

Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
Australia 9 13 22 11 149 29 13.54 147 101.36 0 0 3 13 1 investigate this query
New Zealand 9 11 20 7 200 57 15.38 228 87.71 0 1 2 12 9 investigate this query
India 9 13 27 8 258 46 13.57 333 77.47 0 0 2 18 9 investigate this query
England 7 9 9 3 65 47* 10.83 94 69.14 0 0 4 8 0 investigate this query
South Africa 10 10 8 2 25 8 4.16 58 43.10 0 0 2 1 0

 

 

  • Most of the runs are being scored and to be scored by the top 7
Link to comment

India openers

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 1 and 2 remove between 1 and 2 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 1 of 1   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
India 2 13 26 1 976 143 39.04 1176 82.99 2 6 3 96 20

 

 

Ind 4-7

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 4 and 7 remove between 4 and 7 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 1 of 1   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
India 9 13 42 11 1187 90 38.29 1401 84.72 0 7 5 107 22

 

  • Despite getting to bat in a favorable environment, Ind openers have underperformed 
  • #4-7 avg 38 vs openers 39 

 

/thread

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, zen said:

India openers

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 1 and 2 remove between 1 and 2 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 1 of 1   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
India 2 13 26 1 976 143 39.04 1176 82.99 2 6 3 96 20

 

 

Ind 4-7

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 4 and 7 remove between 4 and 7 from query
Grouped by team remove team from query
Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 1 of 1   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
India 9 13 42 11 1187 90 38.29 1401 84.72 0 7 5 107 22

 

  • Despite getting to bat in a favorable environment, Ind openers have underperformed 
  • #4-7 avg 38 vs openers 39 

 

/thread

Favorable conditions :laugh:

 

13 games this year out of which some games were on Green manbas in Nzl.

 

By the same account Rayudu and Shankar are heroes and deserving a spot in the squad and Hardik has missed all of these games :laugh1:

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, zen said:

Finally 

 

image.png.4adb63568e4304700859ac85b63baef8.png

 

  • Ind tail has contributed the highest to its team totals 

Can you provide numbers behind that? Instead of %?  2(1) is a 200 strike rate where as 150(100) is a 159 strike rate.

 

 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, maniac said:

Favorable conditions :laugh:

 

13 games this year out of which some games were on Green manbas in Nzl.

 

By the same account Rayudu and Shankar are heroes and deserving a spot in the squad and Hardik has missed all of these games :laugh1:

For Rohit, may be anything that moves slightly is a mamba :dontknow:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Opposition team New Zealand remove New Zealand from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 1 and 7 remove between 1 and 7 from query
Qualifications matches played greater than or equal to 3 remove matches played greater than or equal to 3 from query
Ordered by batting average (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 7 of 7   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
AT Rayudu 5 5 2 190 90 63.33 231 82.25 0 1 1 18 6 investigate this query
V Kohli 3 3 0 148 60 49.33 178 83.14 0 1 0 14 1 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 3 2 1 49 48* 49.00 39 125.64 0 0 0 5 1 investigate this query
S Dhawan 5 5 1 188 75* 47.00 230 81.73 0 2 0 23 1 investigate this query
V Shankar 3 1 0 45 45 45.00 64 70.31 0 0 0 4 0 investigate this query
RG Sharma 5 5 0 169 87 33.80 236 71.61 0 2 0 13 5 investigate this query
KM Jadhav 5 3 1 57 34 28.50 62 91.93 0 0 0 6 1

 

 

PS and also the SR:phehe:
 
Edited by zen
Link to comment
1 minute ago, zen said:

For Rohit, may be anything that moves slightly is a mamba :dontknow:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Opposition team New Zealand remove New Zealand from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 remove between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019 from query
Batting position between 1 and 7 remove between 1 and 7 from query
Qualifications matches played greater than or equal to 3 remove matches played greater than or equal to 3 from query
Ordered by batting average (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 7 of 7   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
AT Rayudu 5 5 2 190 90 63.33 231 82.25 0 1 1 18 6 investigate this query
V Kohli 3 3 0 148 60 49.33 178 83.14 0 1 0 14 1 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 3 2 1 49 48* 49.00 39 125.64 0 0 0 5 1 investigate this query
S Dhawan 5 5 1 188 75* 47.00 230 81.73 0 2 0 23 1 investigate this query
V Shankar 3 1 0 45 45 45.00 64 70.31 0 0 0 4 0 investigate this query
RG Sharma 5 5 0 169 87 33.80 236 71.61 0 2 0 13 5 investigate this query
KM Jadhav 5 3 1 57 34 28.50 62 91.93 0 0 0 6 1

 

 

PS and also the SR:phehe:
 

How is your sample set getting lower and lower :laugh: from 13 games to now 5. Oh wait may be because of that incredible 100 in Aus 

Link to comment
 
 
1
3 minutes ago, maniac said:

Can you provide numbers behind that? Instead of %?  2(1) is a 200 strike rate where as 150(100) is a 159 strike rate.

 

Just use the numbers in the table posted here on this thread .... I did a calculation on the fly and do not save such files!

 

For e.g. 

Ind 1-7 = 2809; 8-11 = 258

Eng 1715; 65

and so on

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, maniac said:

How is your sample set getting lower and lower :laugh: from 13 games to now 5. Oh wait may be because of that incredible 100 in Aus 

that was for NZ that you asked :lol:

 

"13 games this year out of which some games were on Green manbas in Nzl." .... Don't get panic attacks :p:

 

Close the thread

Link to comment
Just now, zen said:

that was for NZ that you asked :lol:

 

"13 games this year out of which some games were on Green manbas in Nzl." .... Don't get panic attacks :p:

 

Close the thread

SR is not a factor on green mambas neutralizing new ball is. 236 balls is nearly 40 overs that is approx 8 overs per match neutralizing the new ball which helped us win the series. What a beast a mosnotrous 264 on one day and a sedate new ball neutralizing  knock on another :hatsoff: hallmark of a champion. Switching gears according to situation

Link to comment

I see the usual brainless power play argument. These days entire 50 overs is a powerplay. 4 fielders outside 30 overs is as good as powerplay. Playing reckless cricket upfront and bringing Dhoni early is the ultimate stupid thing to do. Top three has to do bulk of the scoring like they did last two times in England. You cannot leave 40 overs to middle order in quest of  20 extra runs. Even today England was 74/1 Their pace picked up only after that. Pakistan was only 59/2 in the first 10. That is the modern day cricket score quickly in the middle and finish big. Even in IPL the team that finished big win 90% of the time. You could start well couple of wickets it will give so many opposition to claw back

Link to comment

Since 2013 in ICC events vs. 5 major teams:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2013 remove greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2013 from query
Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) remove ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) from query or World Cup remove World Cup from query
Batting position between 1 and 7 remove between 1 and 7 from query
Qualifications matches played greater than or equal to 9 remove matches played greater than or equal to 9 from query
Ordered by batting average (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 4 of 4   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
V Kohli 2013-2017 9 9 3 412 107 68.66 479 86.01 1 2 0 33 5 investigate this query
S Dhawan 2013-2017 9 9 0 615 137 68.33 592 103.88 2 3 0 70 8 investigate this query
RG Sharma 2013-2017 9 9 0 244 91 27.11 343 71.13 0 2 2 22 6 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 2013-2017 9 6 0 132 65 22.00 135 97.77 0 1 1 10 3

 

 

Rohit and Dhoni need to pull up their socks or quit after the WC :hitler:

Edited by zen
Link to comment
37 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

I see the usual brainless power play argument. These days entire 50 overs is a powerplay. 4 fielders outside 30 overs is as good as powerplay. Playing reckless cricket upfront and bringing Dhoni early is the ultimate stupid thing to do. Top three has to do bulk of the scoring like they did last two times in England. You cannot leave 40 overs to middle order in quest of  20 extra runs. Even today England was 74/1 Their pace picked up only after that. Pakistan was only 59/2 in the first 10. That is the modern day cricket score quickly in the middle and finish big. Even in IPL the team that finished big win 90% of the time. You could start well couple of wickets it will give so many opposition to claw back

England where 172 in 20 overs . Indian openers won’t get to 130 on a good day . We lose early wickets I can understand going steady , my problem is on flat pitches we will be content scoring run a ball 

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

England where 172 in 20 overs . Indian openers won’t get to 130 on a good day . We lose early wickets I can understand going steady , my problem is on flat pitches we will be content scoring run a ball 

Here is the problem England has Morgan Stokes Root in the middle They can sustain the rate. We have Dhoni Jadhav possibly Shankar. These three cannot sustain. Even at their worst Rohit Dhawan  > Shankar Jadhav Dhoni. I would rather want them to bat for than Dhoni and co.  Getting those 20 extra runs in the first 10 will amount to nothing. Dhoni will blame the pitch and get away. Also our lower order is super weak.

High time we realize we are

not batting strong anymore we are bowling strong team So  we have to stop

thinking about 350 all the time

Link to comment
1 hour ago, jusarrived said:

England where 172 in 20 overs . Indian openers won’t get to 130 on a good day . We lose early wickets I can understand going steady , my problem is on flat pitches we will be content scoring run a ball 

Exactly, have to play as per the conditions and not some preconceived formula or perception 

 

The issue is in trying to discuss with guys who opposes likes of Pant to support Dhoni, Shankar and DK because they perceive them to be playing “safe” cricket, which is basically getting out LBW with a low score vs going for a 6. And then these guys would criticize Dhoni and Shankar, whom they support, to justify likes of Rohit playing perceived “safe” cricket and shield those guys, and when it is hard to play long innings consistently

 

If a player is in form, he will take less time to get going. If not, he is likely to get out at the first challenge

Edited by zen
Link to comment
42 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Here is the problem England has Morgan Stokes Root in the middle They can sustain the rate. We have Dhoni Jadhav possibly Shankar. These three cannot sustain. Even at their worst Rohit Dhawan  > Shankar Jadhav Dhoni. I would rather want them to bat for than Dhoni and co.  Getting those 20 extra runs in the first 10 will amount to nothing. Dhoni will blame the pitch and get away. Also our lower order is super weak.

High time we realize we are

not batting strong anymore we are bowling strong team So  we have to stop

thinking about 350 all the time

Morgan/stokes/root are not that great , you are overrating them . Anyway , i will not even talk about England’s batting, which is far superior in every aspect . Are we better than even Pakistan though ?  It dosent make sense comparing Rohit/Dhawan with our middle order , compare them with imam/fakar ..are they any better? ... I have accepted long back that our batting is average , which includes our opening . Rohit and Dhawan are one of the weakest opening pair in this WC . 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...