Mariyam Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Is this the strongest team in world cricket to not win a WC? Or at least, is this the strongest Indian team that hasn't won a WC? Discuss. Link to comment
Stan AF Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 The adjective (strong) is incorrect. We were a relatively weak side. Mariyam and Unstable Joe 1 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) There have been many stronger teams which hasn't won worldcup. 1999 SA comes first to my mind. I won't say this is strongest indian team to not win the worldcup cause i feel 2003 team was better. Edited July 11, 2019 by Nikola Chalks and bhakum20 2 Link to comment
R!TTER Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Kahe ki strong, India from 2003/11 would wipe this team in chases or even batting first. People tend to forget how easy batting has become after 2 new balls, let this *ers try it out & then see how many 200s or kitty chases they perform Unstable Joe, Nikola and diga 1 2 Link to comment
ShoonyaSifar Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 No way was this the strongest Indian team. Till the semis we did not know who our best middle order bats and backup bowlers were. 2003 team was much more balanced and much stronger except that they faced at ATG ODI side. Sehwag, Sachin, Dada, Dravid, Yuvraj, Kaif, Bhajji, Zaheer, Nehra, Srinath and Kumble on bench! That some serious quality there. From this team, only Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli, Shami and Bumrah match up, no one else. Add to it the very poor record of the best players of this team in knock out matches. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
velu Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Probably this team got the best bowling ever in thr history of our odi cricket .. Also the worst middle order as well Sgattick10 1 Link to comment
Adi BB Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 If this is the strongest team of this world cup then God save this sport! indianheart and Unstable Joe 1 1 Link to comment
shami_123 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, velu said: Probably this team got the best bowling ever in thr history of our odi cricket .. Also the worst middle order as well Not really , no , not after dropping both Kuldeep and Shami. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
Adi BB Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 The bowling was best on paper but didnt have a great world cup ,even the 2015 world cup average bowling attack restricted saf to 170 ,pak 221,WI 180,bang 210 and punched above their weight Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
velu Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, shami_123 said: Not really , no , not after dropping both Kuldeep and Shami. Credit Kohli .. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Kiraisjustice said: Strongest team to not win the cup was south africa in 99, from indian perspective yes this was the strongest indian team to not win the world cup, we had our best bowling attack of all time really? bhuvi, pandya & jadeja all avg 35+ while chahal had pretty avg tournament. Only bumrah is best of lot we had. Link to comment
Nikola Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kiraisjustice said: Averages dont matter recent form matters, bhuv averaged 22 in the last 1 year, jadeja bowled well, pandya is a good 5th bowler, as unit this was a great bowling attack which eould have been even better with the inclusion of shami, we had the best bowling attack and best top order, this team was better than all previous indian teams which lost the world cup, maybe the 2003 team was better than this but not by much sorry bhuvan picked 0 wickets in all 6 matches of first powerplay so idk what makes him so special. Getting wickets in death when batsman wants to score quickly doesn't make you great. Jadeja bowled well in just one match and we all know how good he is on flat tracks. Pandya is decent for being 5th bowler though. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
mishra Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Dhawan injury pegged our batting line up. Kohlis questionable selection screwed our Team. Against England, We needed to open our bowling with Jaddu. DK should have never been part of squad. Once Pant was in , I was very optimitic. I would have allways played KD, Jaddu,Bhumrah, Pant, Pandya,Chahal,Rohit,Dhoni,Rahul,Kohli. Only place up for grabs was between Bhuvi and Shami. I would have played Bhuvi ahead of Shami depending upon pitch. And yes, Above team without Dhawan would have made it to finals with atleast 50% chance in winning the finals. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
zen Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) Did not expect Ind to go beyond SF. As for the strongest team, WI of 83. Other teams include Pak of 87, SA of 99, and NZ of 92. Edited July 11, 2019 by zen Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 hours ago, Mariyam said: Or at least, is this the strongest Indian team that hasn't won a WC? 2007 had a stronger batting lineup 2019 had the stronger bowling lineup Link to comment
Ajju Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Actually luckiest team to reach semi finals with good bowling attack Link to comment
IndianRenegade Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 We actually punched above our weight with a no-show middle order. Link to comment
Yoda-esque Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 We have 2 batsmen..2003 team was betterSent from my LM-Q710.FG using Tapatalk Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now