sarcastic Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 This is not a troll thread and I am just thinking... I am not a fan of Rayudu but I think in situations like India faced vs NZ, he would have been very handy in holding up one end and taking the game deeper. If India reached to something like 140 odd in 35 overs with Pandya and Pant still not out, we would have got a fair shot at chasing the target of 240 with some support from Jadeja like he batted yesterday. Did team India blunder in not recalling Rayudu at least when Vijay Sankar was injured. I have no doubt in my mind that he would have at least done a better job than Dinesh Kartick. maniac, Laaloo, Frustrated and 4 others 1 5 1 Link to comment
Frustrated Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Rayudu would hv certainly bailed us out of the crisis , with his big brand new 3d glass, which he purchased just before the WC. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
velu Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 how many IDs do you have @maniac ? vvvslaxman, Real McCoy, Stan AF and 1 other 4 Link to comment
The Realist Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) Absolutely. A middle order of Rayudu, Rahane & Pandey would have provided both the solidity and aggression that was so sorely missed. Edited July 11, 2019 by The Realist Khota, chewy, velu and 6 others 1 6 2 Link to comment
cricketfan28 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Rahane and Pandey may be ..doubt rayudu. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
sarcastic Posted July 11, 2019 Author Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, The Realist said: Absolutely. A middle order of Rayudu, Rahane & Pandey would have provided the both the solidity and aggression so sorely missed. You may be joking but any of the three mentioned would have been good in middle order for yesterday's match when the target is not high but consolidation is required in middle overs. I am not saying about other two as they are not in radar. Neither I am saying they will be good in a high scoring encounter. But for a low scoring match, all three of them can be quite useful. Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
DGBOSS Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 INDIA MISSED JOGINDER SHARMA TOO YESTERDAY !!!!!!!! Unstable Joe, diehardpacer and Singh bling 1 2 Link to comment
mishra Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Rayudu ki Hai lagee hai. Rayudu ke Pet par laat maaree hai Kohli ne. Bhaiyya, Unstable Joe, sarcastic and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment
Frustrated Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, DGBOSS said: INDIA MISSED JOGINDER SHARMA TOO YESTERDAY !!!!!!!! We missed Dinesh Mongia too. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 I knew everyone thinks the players who arent their are always better Some geniuses even wrote on match thread Raina wud have been better Frustrated 1 Link to comment
Laaloo Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Yes he would have been the ideal player but instead we gave more chances to hacks like pant and pandya in our most important odi in 4 years. ViruDilSeKhelo 1 Link to comment
bowl_out Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 29 minutes ago, The Realist said: Absolutely. A middle order of Rayudu, Rahane & Pandey would have provided the both the solidity and aggression so sorely missed. I would have laughing at these names at the beginning of the tournament, but honestly feel these would have been a better 4,5,6 than Pant, DK, Dhoni, particularly given Pandey's IPL form. Of course one wicketkeeper would play, so Rayudu, Pandey, and a wicketkeeper.. Link to comment
maniac Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Laaloo said: Yes he would have been the ideal player but instead we gave more chances to hacks like pant and pandya in our most important odi in 4 years. Link to comment
maniac Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 I know people hate Rayudu but he was given a raw deal which is a fact. Didn’t deserve to get dropped before the WC. Would he have set the tournament on fire, obviously is a different debate. Link to comment
Singh bling Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 After reading this thread tears will start flowing from Rayudu's eyes and he will unretire himself. Link to comment
Sean Bradley Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) Rayudu should have never been in contention at first place, we missed the boat even before rayudu to be fair, we had ample time to groom a youngster, but instead we played musical chair at #4 with iyer, pandey, raydu and god knows what not before pushing rishabh pant into the water and asking him to learn to swim. Edited July 11, 2019 by Sean Bradley Link to comment
Yoda-esque Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Would not have made to SF with a joker like Rayudu in teamSent from my LM-Q710.FG using Tapatalk Frustrated 1 Link to comment
ViruDilSeKhelo Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) Ek hai hero jo deep leta hai, bhul na mat. Uska wafadar sepayu (rayadu, jhadav, kohli) deep ki koshis karte hai jyada lekin saphalta nahi milti Edited July 12, 2019 by ViruDilSeKhelo Link to comment
nevada Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 We missed Shankar. Remember his 40 odd in NZ in swinging conditions? He looked very comfortable against NZ's bowlers and that's the whole reason he got in to the WC squad. Perhaps the promise and poise shown in that innings would have actually come to fruition in our time of need in the SF. ViruDilSeKhelo 1 Link to comment
Khota Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Yes he was missed and so was Jadhav. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now