Jump to content

Pandya is the only “allrounder” to neither have a 50 or a 4fr


Recommended Posts

Just now, maniac said:

He got out playing across the line to a spinner when that was not needed and the pitch eased up.

 

Even spin bowling allrounders like Shakib had a ATG record, Imad Wasim played a match winning knock to get his team over the line and Jadeja scored a 50 to almost win the game.

 

it's a bottom half performance along with Morris, Pheklekwayo etc. something you expect from a bottom half side not the top side in the world

That is fine as the RRR was in the process of constantly rising. And NZ spinner needed to be unsettled 

 

I do not know why you are talking about 50 as if it is some kind of a milestone for a guy whose main role is to get quick runs for his team and when he has scores of 45, 46, and 48 at a great SR

 

When specialists like Rohit need chances to even score a 50, Pandya's performances in all 3 departments are commendable

 

Thanks!

 

 

Link to comment

Let's go through his innings

 

15* and 7 * with little runs needed and lot of deliveries. even Chahal/Bunrah could have got those

 

Against pak in a clutch came in the 38th over with a license after a great platform got 26(19)

 

Against Afghan scored 7 when he was really needed as India was back to the wall

 

Against Bangla got a duck

 

AGainst Aus got a 48, I am not going to apply FCA here because it's lame and 40 odd vs WI-decent knocks nothing earth shattering

 

45 vs Eng and 32 vs Newzeland should have been knocks where there was plenty of time and should have gotten us over the line but choke job

 

I guess we set the bar so low for 5th bowler that economy rate of 5.6 and average of 46 is considered great bowling performance :clap:

 

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, sandeep said:

In this corner, we have Zen, who will over-hype Pandya, and attack Rohit Sharma using "stats".  In the other corner, we have an asshole with the opposite agenda, doing budhdhi noo pradharshan - translates to 'demonstrating his acumen' (sarcasm is to be understood).  

 

 

Looks like the steam from pressure cooker making  Dhokla covered this bozos soda bottle glasses. check Stokes and Neesham's performance "MR.Pandya is better than Stokes"

Edited by maniac
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, zen said:

That is fine as the RRR was in the process of constantly rising. And NZ spinner needed to be unsettled 

 

I do not know why you are talking about 50 as if it is some kind of a milestone for a guy whose main role is to get quick runs for his team and when he has scores of 45, 46, and 48 at a great SR

 

When specialists like Rohit need chances to even score a 50, Pandya's performances in all 3 departments are commendable

 

Thanks!

 

 

Check the breakdown of his innings and bowling stats

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, maniac said:

Let's go through his innings

 

15* and 7 * with little runs needed and lot of deliveries. even Chahal/Bunrah could have got those

 

Against pak in a clutch came in the 38th over with a license after a great platform got 26(19)

 

Against Afghan scored 7 when he was really needed as India was back to the wall

 

Against Bangla got a duck

 

AGainst Aus got a 48, I am not going to apply FCA here because it's lame and 40 odd vs WI-decent knocks nothing earth shattering

 

45 vs Eng and 32 vs Newzeland should have been knocks where there was plenty of time and should have gotten us over the line but choke job

 

I guess we set the bar so low for 5th bowler that economy rate of 5.6 and average of 46 is considered great bowling performance :clap:

 

 

That is fine considering certain someone who was playing in his 4th ICC tourney needed tons of chances to even score a 50 :hysterical:

 

And he is not even in his 4th ICC event yet :p:

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Dil Dil India said:

lol at the mention of FCA. What's tailunt's FCA this WC?

Dropped on a single digit score every time, he made a 50+ score :lol:  .... For hint - against NZ, there was no drop, so got out for 1

Edited by zen
Link to comment
Just now, zen said:

 

That is fine considering certain someone who was playing in his 4th ICC tourney needed tons of chances to even score a 50 :hysterical:

 

And he is not even in his 4th ICC event yet :p:

Has a man of the match in 2 of those knockouts, 100 in the most important game in this wc outside of the finals. I can probably fill this thread up if we are just discussing cameos :giggle:

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, maniac said:

Has a man of the match in 2 of those knockouts, 100 in the most important game in this wc outside of the finals. I can probably fill this thread up if we are just discussing cameos :giggle:

If Pandya opens (and also receives that many chances), .... :yay:

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, maniac said:

Looks like the steam from pressure cooker making  Dhokla covered this bozos soda bottle glasses. check Stokes and Neesham's performance "MR.Pandya is better than Stokes"

 

Pandya bowled more overs than Stokes.  Took more wickets than Stokes.  Didn't have the luxury of being 6th or 7th bowler, had to front up and bowl during difficult times - which he did, reasonably well.  

 

Its interesting how you bend over backwards swallowing your own s**t trying to minimize the value of Pandya's innings against Australia - which arguably ended up being the difference between winning and losing that game.  

 

There's a reason why the consensus on Pandya's WC is that he did well.  And the only moroniac with an agenda trying to bash him, isn't really getting the traction he hoped for.  But you do you.  Its a free forum.  Others are free to call out your trash too though.  

 

Time for you to go run and hide, and come back as global baba, or whatever weirdness floats your boat.  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...