Ankit_sharma03 Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 (edited) Zak - give the player u identify atleast 30 games even if he fails Chopra- remember someone backed yuvraj singh when he struggled for more then 20 games post Icc champions trophy 2000 Spot on by both....... something i hve saying.....have pateince with youngster for 50 games atleast Edited August 8, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03 Stuge 1 Link to comment
velu Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 problem with our TM is they will chances to players iike rayudu , dk , pandey etc Link to comment
sandeep Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 Problem isn't just giving enough games - its giving enough games to the right guys. For example, if you gave 15 more games to a karthik or Rayudu, that would suck. The right thing to do is to give those games to Iyer/Pant. I also want to see potential Jadhav replacements auditioned properly. Better versions of Krunal or Deepak Hooda. England won the world cup because they had guys like Buttler (Rishabh), Stokes (Hardik), Moeen (???), Archer (???) contributing on multiple sides of the ball. White ball cricket is an arms race of batting depth and firepower. Next WC is in India, which means that spin bowling allrounders will be effective. Guys like Hooda, Nitish Rana, K Goutham etc have a golden chance at making an int'l career. Although looking at Goutham's batting in the ongoing A series, it looks rank ordinary. Link to comment
Sandeep99 Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 14 minutes ago, sandeep said: Problem isn't just giving enough games - its giving enough games to the right guys. For example, if you gave 15 more games to a karthik or Rayudu, that would suck. The right thing to do is to give those games to Iyer/Pant. I also want to see potential Jadhav replacements auditioned properly. Better versions of Krunal or Deepak Hooda. England won the world cup because they had guys like Buttler (Rishabh), Stokes (Hardik), Moeen (???), Archer (???) contributing on multiple sides of the ball. White ball cricket is an arms race of batting depth and firepower. Next WC is in India, which means that spin bowling allrounders will be effective. Guys like Hooda, Nitish Rana, K Goutham etc have a golden chance at making an int'l career. Although looking at Goutham's batting in the ongoing A series, it looks rank ordinary. With all due respect, Pant = Buttler and Stokes = Pandya? Please.................... JourneyMan 1 Link to comment
Pollack Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, velu said: problem with our TM is they will chances to players iike rayudu , dk , pandey etc You loved Rayudu a lot and Pandeyji was screwd by his guru slowni.. Don't forget. Edited August 8, 2019 by Pollack raki05 and velu 1 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted August 8, 2019 Author Share Posted August 8, 2019 2 hours ago, sandeep said: Although looking at Goutham's batting in the ongoing A series, it looks rank ordinary. it is ordinary.....he is not good enough to bat in top 7 Link to comment
sandeep Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Pollack said: You loved Rayudu a lot and Pandeyji was screwd by his guru slowni.. Don't forget. I "loved" Rayudu? Did you mistake me for Moroniac? Vijy and Stan AF 2 Link to comment
Vijy Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 12 hours ago, sandeep said: Problem isn't just giving enough games - its giving enough games to the right guys. For example, if you gave 15 more games to a karthik or Rayudu, that would suck. The right thing to do is to give those games to Iyer/Pant. I also want to see potential Jadhav replacements auditioned properly. Better versions of Krunal or Deepak Hooda. England won the world cup because they had guys like Buttler (Rishabh), Stokes (Hardik), Moeen (???), Archer (???) contributing on multiple sides of the ball. White ball cricket is an arms race of batting depth and firepower. Next WC is in India, which means that spin bowling allrounders will be effective. Guys like Hooda, Nitish Rana, K Goutham etc have a golden chance at making an int'l career. Although looking at Goutham's batting in the ongoing A series, it looks rank ordinary. mooen is not very good in ODIs with the bat or ball. I reckon that krunal is roughly on par with him. finding someone like archer, even just taking his sheer pace into account, is very hard. hardik might be able to takeover the stokes role, but pant really needs to learn to bottle his wild slogs if he wants to emulate and surpass buttler. in indian conditions, seems to me that the best bet is to make pant open and have gill in the middle order. something like: rohit/rahul/shaw, Pant, Gill, Rat, Mayank, Hardik, Krunal/Hooda/Rana, Rahul Chahar/Jaddu, Kuldeep, Saini, Bumrah. Team has 6 bowling options and bats till 8. a pity that our 9-11 can't bat, but one cannot have everything. My only unorthodox choice is putting mayank at 5 and pant at opening, but I feel the latter is more suited for a gilly-type role than buttler. and mayank, based on what I saw in his Ind A games and tests seems to have a very complete game. he can bat calculatedly, he can defend solidly, and he can also score quick when the need arises. so I would like a player along these lines at 5. Link to comment
cricketfan28 Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 30 is too high, should be 10-15. We have many youngsters to try if we stick to 30 it won't work. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted August 9, 2019 Author Share Posted August 9, 2019 11 minutes ago, cricketfan28 said: 30 is too high, should be 10-15. We have many youngsters to try if we stick to 30 it won't work. no 30 is right....10-15 is to less. Players like yuvraj, rohit took 70-80 games to evolve...so even 30 is less in that way U dont have to give every youngster 30 games....identify right player and back them for 30 games For eg - Rayudu, DK, rahane were not right players. Players like Rahul, pant, gill are so give them that much of time Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Wonder where this wisdom was 4 years ago. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now