Jump to content
Norman

What are your views on the Aryan Dravidian theory ?

Recommended Posts

Now power politics have been involved in scientific studies within India, which is unfortunate. Already a huge pressure upon the researchers (especially abroad) to follow the guidelines and rules set by BJP Government. 

 

4500-year-old DNA from Rakhigarhi reveals evidence that will unsettle Hindutva nationalists

Link.

 

No R1a found in Rakhigarhi, while today normal Indian has 17.5% of R1a.

 

But the DNA of 4500 years old Rakhigarhi resembles the DNA of South Indians much more than the North Indians. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Now power politics have been involved in scientific studies within India, which is unfortunate. Already a huge pressure upon the researchers (especially abroad) to follow the guidelines and rules set by BJP Government. 

 

4500-year-old DNA from Rakhigarhi reveals evidence that will unsettle Hindutva nationalists

Link.

 

No R1a found in Rakhigarhi, while today normal Indian has 17.5% of R1a.

 

But the DNA of 4500 years old Rakhigarhi resembles the DNA of South Indians much more than the North Indians. 

 

This doesn't prove any data of migration, but shows the starting of trade, and interaction and also invasion of Central Asian Mongols and EU post Moghul era. These are not new discoveries, HMS already did this part of their study in 2009. Read my last response to you where I posted the link. Peddling some nonsense as proof of AMT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Now power politics have been involved in scientific studies within India, which is unfortunate. Already a huge pressure upon the researchers (especially abroad) to follow the guidelines and rules set by BJP Government. 

 

4500-year-old DNA from Rakhigarhi reveals evidence that will unsettle Hindutva nationalists

Link.

 

No R1a found in Rakhigarhi, while today normal Indian has 17.5% of R1a.

 

But the DNA of 4500 years old Rakhigarhi resembles the DNA of South Indians much more than the North Indians. 

 

One sample means nothing . But we know you wanna push an invader agenda 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

This doesn't prove any data of migration, but shows the starting of trade, and interaction and also invasion of Central Asian Mongols and EU post Moghul era. These are not new discoveries, HMS already did this part of their study in 2009. Read my last response to you where I posted the link. Peddling some nonsense as proof of AMT.

In 2009?

While the article suggests:

//

These revelations are part of the long-awaited and much-postponed results of an excavation conducted in 2015 by a team led by Dr Vasant Shinde, an archaeologist and vice chancellor of Pune's Deccan College.

Why did it take so long? One answer was on offer exactly a year ago when this writer spoke to Shinde who was then holding out the promise of publishing the findings in September 2017. "It's a very politically sensitive issue," he said.

//

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

In 2009?

While the article suggests:

//

These revelations are part of the long-awaited and much-postponed results of an excavation conducted in 2015 by a team led by Dr Vasant Shinde, an archaeologist and vice chancellor of Pune's Deccan College.

Why did it take so long? One answer was on offer exactly a year ago when this writer spoke to Shinde who was then holding out the promise of publishing the findings in September 2017. "It's a very politically sensitive issue," he said.

//

 

 

 

 

Because there is only ONE sample and it’s not enough to draw a conclusion . Nice yet anti Indian propaganda peddler 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

first of all i dont understand what the issue is here?

 

if u guys are saying that there was no settlement of Aryans or lets say a more Indo/Persio/european kind of race who settled in ancient India and what crystallized between the settlers and also the locals and it synthesized into Hinduism. so what the fk is the big deal about it? why so much stigma for this shittt? 

 

u are all smart people. i dont think ur dumb enough to think that a Kasmiri pundit or Punjabi jatt genetics are same as a Tamil person?

 

 

Edited by Reddysaab

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Reddysaab said:

first of all i dont understand what the issue is here?

 

if u guys are saying that there was no settlement of Aryans or lets say a more Indo/Persio/european kind of race who settled in ancient India and what crystallized between the settlers and also the locals and it synthesized into Hinduism. so what the fk is the big deal about it? why so much stigma for this shittt? 

 

u are all smart people. i dont think ur dumb enough to think that a Kasmiri pundit or Punjabi jatt genetics are same as a Tamil person?

 

 

The kashmiri Pandits or Punjabi Jatt has more in commo with a Tamil than with anyone else, FYI. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

Now power politics have been involved in scientific studies within India, which is unfortunate. Already a huge pressure upon the researchers (especially abroad) to follow the guidelines and rules set by BJP Government. 

 

4500-year-old DNA from Rakhigarhi reveals evidence that will unsettle Hindutva nationalists

Link.

 

No R1a found in Rakhigarhi, while today normal Indian has 17.5% of R1a.

 

But the DNA of 4500 years old Rakhigarhi resembles the DNA of South Indians much more than the North Indians. 

 

But dna of south and north indians aren't different 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...