Jump to content
rangeelaraja

Afretard: ‘ Padosi mulk should know Pathans have ruled neighbours but never been ruled ‘

Recommended Posts

Hate to bring up this subhuman afretard but was watching this express news Hd - Pak news channel on dish to enjoy their national meltdown over 370. afretard is invited to their political programs, right now on express news Hd he expressed yet again some fake pathani machismo. These people are surely going to the dogs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

Hate to bring up this subhuman afretard but was watching this express news Hd - Pak news channel on dish to enjoy their national meltdown over 370. afretard is invited to their political programs, right now on express news Hd he expressed yet again some fake pathani machismo. These people are surely going to the dogs.

Tell them about Hari Singh Nalwa and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The reason why Khyber Pakhtunkwa is in Pakistan today instead of Afghanistan is because of these two men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No point - these converted cowards think they are descendants of central Asians and Arabs and deny their own ancestry, whereas the Arabs treat them as 3rd rate converts in the gulf. 

 

According to them the Musharraf’s and Bajwa’s are not even India origin but Turks.

 

this is a pathetic fake nation in utter denial and fed on despicable lies  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Tell them about Hari Singh Nalwa and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The reason why Khyber Pakhtunkwa is in Pakistan today instead of Afghanistan is because of these two men.

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, panther said:

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

We conquered up to Khyber. In any case, your masters , aka Iranians said hello. Told  us to remind you on how you were their bitches for thousand years straight and you’d still be their bitch if Nader Shah didn’t die in such an untimely fashion. 

 

Ps: your territory isn’t worth conquering, unless people are on their way to India or protecting trade routes west and north of Kabul. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Muloghonto said:

We conquered up to Khyber. In any case, your masters , aka Iranians said hello. Told  us to remind you on how you were their bitches for thousand years straight and you’d still be their bitch if Nader Shah didn’t die in such an untimely fashion. 

 

Ps: your territory isn’t worth conquering, unless people are on their way to India or protecting trade routes west and north of Kabul. 

You're not A sikh, you bengalis didn't conquer anything, we pashtuns ruled over you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“ your territory” ? 

 

Lol another deluded thing. Did a thing call Pakistan exist before 1947 ???

 

oh I see, your logic is “ hum musalman” 

 

this is your fall back as a failed state with 0 positive achievements of your own  in 73 years. 

 

Argentines or Brazilians never say we Christians ruled the world taking credit for the exploits of Christian British or French. 

 

Because they are genuine nations with things to be proud of. This “ hum musalman” is a Pak speciality. Don’t think any self respecting thinks in such a manner.

 

and the reality is those barbaric warlords from Central Asia and Afghanistan who invaded india are now piddly countries not enough to carry India’s poop - whereas a United india now is marching towards a great power status.

 

please enlighten yourself - Sikh empire ruled almost the entire Pakistan -with Lahore as Capital 

 

 

Go look up every Sikh Afghan war.

 

we Sikhs shoved your pathani backside where the sun don’t shine 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan–Sikh_Wars

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, panther said:

You're not A sikh, you bengalis didn't conquer anything, we pashtuns ruled over you.

Um yes we did. We conquered Kabul and kept it under our boot for 100 years, under   Dharmapala and Devapala. Badal pillar is proof, so are the inscriptions from Bajaur. But you illiterate Pathans know nothing, so not surprised 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, panther said:

You're not A sikh, you bengalis didn't conquer anything, we pashtuns ruled over you.

Your masters from Iran called. Told me to tell you to resume sending your daughters as tribute , like your historical aukaad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Muloghonto said:

Only thing it’s better than India at is coups and producing terrorists

Wonder why India is slow here. They have so much population and yet none of them are able to produce a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s astonishing how the Sikhs hammered the daylights out of the pathans in all the battles. See battle of Shopian in the above link - they annexed entire Kashmir !

 

and it is the same Sikhs that created Bangladesh in 1971 .

 

no wonder the coward Paks pee at the sound of “ Jo bole sau nihaal...”

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said:

It’s astonishing how the Sikhs hammered the daylights out of the pathans in all the battles. See battle of Shopian in the above link - they annexed entire Kashmir !

 

and it is the same Sikhs that created Bangladesh in 1971 .

 

no wonder the coward Paks pee at the sound of “ Jo bole sau nihaal...”

 

 

Since you love Afridi and don’t have a voice to go against him. Its clear how a Pathan is beating a Sikh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

“ your territory” ? 

 

Lol another deluded thing. Did a thing call Pakistan exist before 1947 ???

 

oh I see, your logic is “ hum musalman” 

 

this is your fall back as a failed state with 0 positive achievements of your own  in 73 years. 

 

Argentines or Brazilians never say we Christians ruled the world taking credit for the exploits of Christian British or French. 

 

Because they are genuine nations with things to be proud of. This “ hum musalman” is a Pak speciality. Don’t think any self respecting thinks in such a manner.

 

and the reality is those barbaric warlords from Central Asia and Afghanistan who invaded india are now piddly countries not enough to carry India’s poop - whereas a United india now is marching towards a great power status.

 

please enlighten yourself - Sikh empire ruled almost the entire Pakistan -with Lahore as Capital 

 

 

Go look up every Sikh Afghan war.

 

we Sikhs shoved your pathani backside where the sun don’t shine 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan–Sikh_Wars

 

 

 

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, panther said:

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Since religion is your drug, go educate yourself and find out when Sikhism was founded and you will get the answer to your illiterate question.

 

why do you relate yourself to tajiks and Turks ? Arnt you the converted lot from the subcontinent that the Arabs consider 3rd rate ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, panther said:

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Look at how a miniscule number of Sikhs managed to rule over heavily muslim populated areas of Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber.

 

And nowadays Pashtuns are being ruled by Muslim Punjabis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, veer said:

:facepalm::facepalm:

 

We are discussing afretards statements here.. really?

Boom boom going boom boom in the Op’s ears. The Op loves that boom boom candy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Look at how a miniscule number of Sikhs managed to rule over heavily muslim populated areas of Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber.

 

And nowadays Pashtuns are being ruled by Muslim Punjabis.

Muslims already done that, long before sikhs, when it was almost all hindu/Buddhist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

Since religion is your drug, go educate yourself and find out when Sikhism was founded and you will get the answer to your illiterate question.

 

why do you relate yourself to tajiks and Turks ? Arnt you the converted lot from the subcontinent that the Arabs consider 3rd rate ?

Because that's how things rolled, Mahmud Of ghaznavi Invaded India with Turks, Afghans and hindus, why do you think there are so many Afghan Decendants All over India, they came with various kings and settled down.

 

Nader shah was Turk, but he Invaded India with Mostly Abdali pashtuns.

Edited by panther

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's your sikh empire, barely crossed the Indus, and that too for like 15 years and you boast about it lol.

 

Most of the time we weren't even fighting you infidels, rather we were fighting other muslims.

 

Punjab MapRev2.jpg

Edited by panther

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

Boom boom going boom boom in the Op’s ears. The Op loves that boom boom candy.

please tell me you are not gay.. and this is not some gay talk.. 

 

not that anything is wrong with that but you are creeping me out.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, veer said:

please tell me you are not gay.. and this is not some gay talk.. 

 

not that anything is wrong with that but you are creeping me out.. 

Naw I am straight like a pickle and I sting like a bee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, panther said:

Muslims already done that, long before sikhs, when it was almost all hindu/Buddhist.

A minuscule number of bongs ruled over your foresaken barren land for nearly a century. You lot are nothing since arrival of Islam. Just inbred leeches, bitches of the Persians and Turks. You Pashtuns used to send your women to them as tribute, maybe that’s why you are so keen to look up to your former masters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FExcerpt about Mahmoud of Ghazni:

 

” 

The core of the Ghaznavid army was primarily made up of Turks,[30] as well as thousands of native Afghans who were trained and assembled from the area south of the Hindu Kush in what is now Afghanistan.[31][32] During the rule of Sultan Mahmud, a new, larger military training center was established in Bost (now Lashkar Gah). This area was known for blacksmiths where war weapons were made. After capturing and conquering the Punjab region, the Ghaznavids began to employ Hindus in their army.[33][34]

Like the other dynasties that rose out of the remains of the Abbasid Caliphate, the Ghaznavid administrative traditions and military practice came from the Abbasids. “

 

 

Ghaznavids were turks. Not Pathans. Who ruled Pathan lands as well as Punjab and recruited Pathans and Punjabis to bolster their core of Mameluk Turks. Pashtoons are usually a no name power, kind of like the Sikhs historically but have a lot of recency bias due to their most successful and only major Pashtun rule coming recently( AS Abdali) , much like the Sikhs really came into their own due to Ranjit Singh. But while Pashtuns quickly faded into irrelevancy outside of guerilla tactics ( which is tacit admission of inferiority on the battle field: no dominant military power ever resorts to guerilla tactics, that tactics only suits an inferior native power, by definition) the Sikhs have remained a hallowed military bulwark into recent times . 

Edited by Muloghonto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, panther said:

Muslims already done that, long before sikhs, when it was almost all hindu/Buddhist.

Your ancestors were Buddhists and they should have stayed so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

Hate to bring up this subhuman afretard but was watching this express news Hd - Pak news channel on dish to enjoy their national meltdown over 370. afretard is invited to their political programs, right now on express news Hd he expressed yet again some fake pathani machismo. These people are surely going to the dogs.

Tell him ki Hari singh nalwa ka naam sunke yusufkzai aur pathano ka mu.. Ut nikal jaata tha. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, panther said:

That's your sikh empire, barely crossed the Indus, and that too for like 15 years and you boast about it lol.

 

Most of the time we weren't even fighting you infidels, rather we were fighting other muslims.

 

Punjab MapRev2.jpg

Bhaiya 15 saalo main hi aukaat yaad dila di thi ,maiya ki daiya kr di thi 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol Pakhtoons were beaten black and blue first by Amer forces and later under Maharaja Jaswant Singh when his Rathore cavalry crushed their spirits. 

The flag of Jaipur state which is called Pacharnga and has 5 colors in it because of Raja Man Singh defeating 5 major Pashtun tribes of that time. 

 

And before anyone brings up that they were fighting for Mughals, The Rajputs were given a special authority so that in most of the campaigns all their forces solely composed of their clan brothers with no Turks in it. 

Therefore it was a total Hindu domination of Pathans. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

FExcerpt about Mahmoud of Ghazni:

 

” 

The core of the Ghaznavid army was primarily made up of Turks,[30] as well as thousands of native Afghans who were trained and assembled from the area south of the Hindu Kush in what is now Afghanistan.[31][32] During the rule of Sultan Mahmud, a new, larger military training center was established in Bost (now Lashkar Gah). This area was known for blacksmiths where war weapons were made. After capturing and conquering the Punjab region, the Ghaznavids began to employ Hindus in their army.[33][34]

Like the other dynasties that rose out of the remains of the Abbasid Caliphate, the Ghaznavid administrative traditions and military practice came from the Abbasids. “

 

 

Ghaznavids were turks. Not Pathans. Who ruled Pathan lands as well as Punjab and recruited Pathans and Punjabis to bolster their core of Mameluk Turks. Pashtoons are usually a no name power, kind of like the Sikhs historically but have a lot of recency bias due to their most successful and only major Pashtun rule coming recently( AS Abdali) , much like the Sikhs really came into their own due to Ranjit Singh. But while Pashtuns quickly faded into irrelevancy outside of guerilla tactics ( which is tacit admission of inferiority on the battle field: no dominant military power ever resorts to guerilla tactics, that tactics only suits an inferior native power, by definition) the Sikhs have remained a hallowed military bulwark into recent times . 

Pakhtoons were basically robbers/bandits , phattus who used to ambush and raid the armies and would hide in their mountainous caverns like cowards once the tide of battle turned against them. 

The only Pashtun worth his salt was Sher Khan and ironically he was born in Bihar so as desi as they come. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Your masters from Iran called. Told me to tell you to resume sending your daughters as tribute , like your historical aukaad.

Historically, Bengalis had a better culture and military heritage than Afghans could even dream of. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, panther said:

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

Speaking of, Where were these brave Pashtuns when Dogra Rajput Raja of Kashmir Gulabh Singh put all the Yusufzai women in his kingdom up for sale. 

Not that I take pride in such activities but since you seem to love the genocidal tendencies of your ancestors, I thought I would mention this little episode in a passing by. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, panther said:

Pashtuns didn't even inhabit Most of those areas before 1000 Ad.

 

11 hours ago, panther said:

That's your sikh empire, barely crossed the Indus, and that too for like 15 years and you boast about it lol.

 

Most of the time we weren't even fighting you infidels, rather we were fighting other muslims.

 

Punjab MapRev2.jpg

Quote

"Looking for the origin of Pashtuns and the Afghans is something like exploring the source of the Amazon. Is there one specific beginning? And are the Pashtuns originally identical with the Afghans? Although the Pashtuns nowadays constitute a clear ethnic group with their own language and culture, there is no evidence whatsoever that all modern Pashtuns share the same ethnic origin. In fact it is highly unlikely."

The above is from wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pashtuns

 

Basically Pashtuns are a mish mash of various ethnicities in that region usually nomads and dacoits much like how you mentioned abdlais were used by Nader shah as a "lashkar" much like today. How come there is no origin of Pashtuns in ancient history. If the answer is Pacytans or Bactria, then that is modern day Afghanistan. If you say they came from somewhere else, that means they are a mixed race nomads.

 

How nice of you to mention us as Infidels when you stay here and vomit your garbage. Why don't you fvck off from this site. Seems your kind are much more uncivilized, barbaric with no mention of history. Rich coming from a descendant of nomads and brigands to call a settled civilization "infidels". You are not unlike nomads outside the cities of Egypt and Mesopotamia. Can't do agriculture, any function in society but will rob and plunder from travelers.

 

You know why nobody invaded you. Because you were a bunch of nomads living in unfertile land with no use for agriculture which are meant for civilized people like Indians and Iranians. Most likely you were shunned by these groups because of your tendency to rob and kill people from nearby lands. Look at how you people treat muslims of other ethnicities in the khyber. Most pakistani punjabis are so cowardly that they wouldn't enter your present day territories. Same regions that the Sikh empire conquered.

 

And what's with the bachebazi system. Its not just gay but pedophilia and rape. Utterly disgusting bunch of people. Before you talk big about your conquests think about what your race has achieved on the international scale. Already USA have bombed the sh1t out of you and now China is knocking on the door

Edited by Real McCoy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real brave pathans of Afghanistan will laugh on Gulkhans like Afridi and @panther who are Punjabi slaves and love licking boots of Punjabi jernails.

These Gulkhans of KPK were fooled in the name of religion and are now enslaved by Punjabis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

Pakhtoons were basically robbers/bandits , phattus who used to ambush and raid the armies and would hide in their mountainous caverns like cowards once the tide of battle turned against them. 

The only Pashtun worth his salt was Sher Khan and ironically he was born in Bihar so as desi as they come. 

Irony is, the two major militarily accomplished Pashtun clans are not originally Pashtun. The Khalaj are descended of the Khilji tribe. In Iran they’ve retained their Turkic roots, in Afghanistan they barged in as the Ghilzai. Next are the Abdali. Aka the Abdal clan in middle Iranian, who are also known as Yeopthal or Hepthal clan of the Hepthalites. Their origin is also Turkic and widely attested in Iranian, Chinese and Indian sources. One of their most feared conqueror was Mihirkula. That name survives as Mehr Gul amongst the Pashtuns. 

 

There are a few long noble clans amongst the Pashtuns though. Bangash are one of the oldest tribes attested. So are some of the tribes under Karlani confederacy.

 

These duffers don’t know their own history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Irony is, the two major militarily accomplished Pashtun clans are not originally Pashtun. The Khalaj are descended of the Khilji tribe. In Iran they’ve retained their Turkic roots, in Afghanistan they barged in as the Ghilzai. Next are the Abdali. Aka the Abdal clan in middle Iranian, who are also known as Yeopthal or Hepthal clan of the Hepthalites. Their origin is also Turkic and widely attested in Iranian, Chinese and Indian sources. One of their most feared conqueror was Mihirkula. That name survives as Mehr Gul amongst the Pashtuns. 

 

There are a few long noble clans amongst the Pashtuns though. Bangash are one of the oldest tribes attested. So are some of the tribes under Karlani confederacy.

 

These duffers don’t know their own history.

Yes both Khaljis and Abdalis weren't Afghan. 

Alhauddin himself held pretty low opinion of Afghans and him despite being relatively liberal in his treatment of the lower class (non Turks) compared to his predecessors such as Balban, his generosity didn't extend to Afghan Warlords who were basically despised by everyone for their unpredictable nature and lack of loyalty. 

 

Note: Here I use both Afghans and Pashtuns interchangeably since historically they are referred to as the same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically the reason why Mughals were successfully able to withstand and crush the long Pakhtoon rebellion first under Akbar and later under Jahangir was because of tenacity and firm resolve showed by Kachwahas and Rathores. 

 

Next time, If any Pashtun mocks Hindus , throw in the name of these two Rajput clans who despite being heavily outnumbered and who were fighting in the relatively hostile terrain with knees deep in snow, completely managed to squash the whole Afghan resistance and sent them running back to their burrows from where they only came out again a century later after Abdali managed to unite them under a single flag. 

 

Abdali himself was lucky that his raidings into Hindustan coincided with the period of basically an anarchy in the subcontinent. 

The Sikhs were divided into various Misls and were yet to emerge as a single unified power. 

The Rajputs were at their weakest battling domestic problems and fighting amongst themselves as usual when time permitted. 

And Marathas, well we all know what a terrible blunder Raghunath Rao committed when he decided to march and meet the Afghans in a fully pitched battle. But that's a topic for another day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Irony is, the two major militarily accomplished Pashtun clans are not originally Pashtun. The Khalaj are descended of the Khilji tribe. In Iran they’ve retained their Turkic roots, in Afghanistan they barged in as the Ghilzai. Next are the Abdali. Aka the Abdal clan in middle Iranian, who are also known as Yeopthal or Hepthal clan of the Hepthalites. Their origin is also Turkic and widely attested in Iranian, Chinese and Indian sources. One of their most feared conqueror was Mihirkula. That name survives as Mehr Gul amongst the Pashtuns. 

 

There are a few long noble clans amongst the Pashtuns though. Bangash are one of the oldest tribes attested. So are some of the tribes under Karlani confederacy.

 

These duffers don’t know their own history.

This duffer even mentions Hepthalites as ruling India. What he forgets is that they never ruled India but ruled them. So much for the invincibility of pashtuns

 

Quote

According to Abdul Hai Habibi, some oriental scholars hold that the second largest Pasthun tribe, the Ghiljis, are the descendants of a mixed race of Hephthalite and Pakhtas who have been living in Afghanistan since the Vedic Aryan period.[38]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

This duffer even mentions Hepthalites as ruling India. What he forgets is that they never ruled India but ruled them. So much for the invincibility of pashtuns

 

 

Hepthalites weren't even Pashtuns to begin so I don't even understand why would he bring them into the argument. 

While Huns did have a short reign over small parts of northern India, their power couldn't last long thanks to the strong local resistance. Yashovarman gave the final blow and Huns were completely defeated. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, panther said:

Because that's how things rolled, Mahmud Of ghaznavi Invaded India with Turks, Afghans and hindus, why do you think there are so many Afghan Decendants All over India, they came with various kings and settled down.

 

Nader shah was Turk, but he Invaded India with Mostly Abdali pashtuns.

Bhai Afghanis look Indian. I have seen Jains of North India who effectively, communitywise are less darker, some have blonde and ginger hairs. Jains also have relatively high percentage of bown and blue eyes.  So if anything, not a single Afghani girl look like Iranian girls. I don’t see boyz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, mishra said:

Bhai Afghanis look Indian. I have seen Jains of North India who effectively, communitywise are less darker, some have blonde and ginger hairs. Jains also have relatively high percentage of bown and blue eyes.  So if anything, not a single Afghani girl look like Iranian girls. I don’t see boyz.

There's the skin color concept again. If Indians or Afghans were dark as the night will it make any difference. We are discussing people in general. Now you yourself are getting baited by him after your warning. Also stop this bhai nonsense. Pakistanis don't consider us bhais

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

There's the skin color concept again. If Indians or Afghans were dark as the night will it make any difference. We are discussing people in general. Now you yourself are getting baited by him after your warning. Also stop this bhai nonsense. Pakistanis don't consider us bhais

:(( Pyaar se danda dete raho. Always ask , are you ok, lagee to nahi :((

scientific evidence shows, home sapiens from Africa screwed Homo Erecus which lived in Afghanistan/ Indian peninsula and neathendrals of Europe. So level of blackness represents maculanity. That where i was taking him. Chitiyapa with Chutiyapa

Edited by mishra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...