Jump to content

Afretard: ‘ Padosi mulk should know Pathans have ruled neighbours but never been ruled ‘


rangeelaraja

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

Hate to bring up this subhuman afretard but was watching this express news Hd - Pak news channel on dish to enjoy their national meltdown over 370. afretard is invited to their political programs, right now on express news Hd he expressed yet again some fake pathani machismo. These people are surely going to the dogs.

Tell them about Hari Singh Nalwa and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The reason why Khyber Pakhtunkwa is in Pakistan today instead of Afghanistan is because of these two men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point - these converted cowards think they are descendants of central Asians and Arabs and deny their own ancestry, whereas the Arabs treat them as 3rd rate converts in the gulf. 

 

According to them the Musharraf’s and Bajwa’s are not even India origin but Turks.

 

this is a pathetic fake nation in utter denial and fed on despicable lies  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Tell them about Hari Singh Nalwa and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The reason why Khyber Pakhtunkwa is in Pakistan today instead of Afghanistan is because of these two men.

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panther said:

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

We conquered up to Khyber. In any case, your masters , aka Iranians said hello. Told  us to remind you on how you were their bitches for thousand years straight and you’d still be their bitch if Nader Shah didn’t die in such an untimely fashion. 

 

Ps: your territory isn’t worth conquering, unless people are on their way to India or protecting trade routes west and north of Kabul. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Muloghonto said:

We conquered up to Khyber. In any case, your masters , aka Iranians said hello. Told  us to remind you on how you were their bitches for thousand years straight and you’d still be their bitch if Nader Shah didn’t die in such an untimely fashion. 

 

Ps: your territory isn’t worth conquering, unless people are on their way to India or protecting trade routes west and north of Kabul. 

You're not A sikh, you bengalis didn't conquer anything, we pashtuns ruled over you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“ your territory” ? 

 

Lol another deluded thing. Did a thing call Pakistan exist before 1947 ???

 

oh I see, your logic is “ hum musalman” 

 

this is your fall back as a failed state with 0 positive achievements of your own  in 73 years. 

 

Argentines or Brazilians never say we Christians ruled the world taking credit for the exploits of Christian British or French. 

 

Because they are genuine nations with things to be proud of. This “ hum musalman” is a Pak speciality. Don’t think any self respecting thinks in such a manner.

 

and the reality is those barbaric warlords from Central Asia and Afghanistan who invaded india are now piddly countries not enough to carry India’s poop - whereas a United india now is marching towards a great power status.

 

please enlighten yourself - Sikh empire ruled almost the entire Pakistan -with Lahore as Capital 

 

 

Go look up every Sikh Afghan war.

 

we Sikhs shoved your pathani backside where the sun don’t shine 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan–Sikh_Wars

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panther said:

You're not A sikh, you bengalis didn't conquer anything, we pashtuns ruled over you.

Um yes we did. We conquered Kabul and kept it under our boot for 100 years, under   Dharmapala and Devapala. Badal pillar is proof, so are the inscriptions from Bajaur. But you illiterate Pathans know nothing, so not surprised 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said:

It’s astonishing how the Sikhs hammered the daylights out of the pathans in all the battles. See battle of Shopian in the above link - they annexed entire Kashmir !

 

and it is the same Sikhs that created Bangladesh in 1971 .

 

no wonder the coward Paks pee at the sound of “ Jo bole sau nihaal...”

 

 

Since you love Afridi and don’t have a voice to go against him. Its clear how a Pathan is beating a Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

“ your territory” ? 

 

Lol another deluded thing. Did a thing call Pakistan exist before 1947 ???

 

oh I see, your logic is “ hum musalman” 

 

this is your fall back as a failed state with 0 positive achievements of your own  in 73 years. 

 

Argentines or Brazilians never say we Christians ruled the world taking credit for the exploits of Christian British or French. 

 

Because they are genuine nations with things to be proud of. This “ hum musalman” is a Pak speciality. Don’t think any self respecting thinks in such a manner.

 

and the reality is those barbaric warlords from Central Asia and Afghanistan who invaded india are now piddly countries not enough to carry India’s poop - whereas a United india now is marching towards a great power status.

 

please enlighten yourself - Sikh empire ruled almost the entire Pakistan -with Lahore as Capital 

 

 

Go look up every Sikh Afghan war.

 

we Sikhs shoved your pathani backside where the sun don’t shine 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan–Sikh_Wars

 

 

 

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, panther said:

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Since religion is your drug, go educate yourself and find out when Sikhism was founded and you will get the answer to your illiterate question.

 

why do you relate yourself to tajiks and Turks ? Arnt you the converted lot from the subcontinent that the Arabs consider 3rd rate ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, panther said:

Where were you sikhs when for 700 years Pashtuns, Tajiks, Turks and others Swept through India, even before Islam the Hepthaphlites Ruled you guys.

Look at how a miniscule number of Sikhs managed to rule over heavily muslim populated areas of Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber.

 

And nowadays Pashtuns are being ruled by Muslim Punjabis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Look at how a miniscule number of Sikhs managed to rule over heavily muslim populated areas of Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber.

 

And nowadays Pashtuns are being ruled by Muslim Punjabis.

Muslims already done that, long before sikhs, when it was almost all hindu/Buddhist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...