Jump to content
Gollum

Opposition, libtards opposing Citizenship Amendment Bill

Recommended Posts

All you need to know about Citizenship (Amendment) Bill

The amended citizenship bill applies to people who were “forced or compelled to seek shelter in India due to persecution on the ground of religion..”.

Quote

WHAT IS THE CITIZENSHIP (AMENDMENT) BILL?

- The bill amends the Citizenship Act, 1955 to make people from Hindu, Sikh, Jain Buddhist, Christian and Parsi faiths who entered India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan eligible for citizenship.

- In case a person belong to the aforementioned faiths, from these three countries, does not have proof of birth of parents, they can apply for Indian citizenship after six years of residence in India.

- The amended bill applies to people who were “forced or compelled to seek shelter in India due to persecution on the ground of religion..”.

- The bill also aims to shield such people from proceedings of illegal migration

WHAT IS THE CUT-OFF DATE?

The cut-off date for people to be eligible for citizenship is December 31, 2014. This means they need to have entered India on or before that date. Under the current law, citizenship is given either to people born in India or if they have resided in the country for a minimum of 11 years.

TWO EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN CAB

There are two exceptions to the bill. The CAB will not apply to areas under the sixth schedule of the Constitution – which deals with autonomous tribal-dominated regions in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. The bill will also not apply to states that have the inner-line permit regime (Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Mizoram). These exceptions didn’t exist in the earlier version.

WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE GOVERNMENT?

- The amendments proposed in the Citizenship Amendment Act 1955 will extend the facility of Indian citizenship to a specific class of persons who are presently facing hardships in acquiring citizenship,” the amended bill reads.

- The bill will also enable the govt to cancel the registration of someone’s OCI card if they violate the provisions of the citizenship law or any other law.

HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT FROM NRC?

- The recently completed National Register of Citizens process in Assam was aimed at weeding out illegal immigrants from citizenship rolls. It mandated that a person had to prove that either they, or their ancestors were present in Assam on or before March 24, 1971. The next day, the war of liberation in Bangladesh began, sending tens of thousands of refugees into India.

- The government has said it will extend the NRC process to the rest of India. The NRC process in Assam was not based on religion. The CAB, on the other hand, is targeted towards certain faiths.

WHY ARE THERE LARGE-SCALE PROTESTS AGAINST CAB IN ASSAM?

In Assam, many groups feel that the CAB will nullify the 1985 Assam Accord, which fixed March 24, 1971 as the cut-off date for deportation of all illegal immigrants irrespective of religion. These activists also say that the NRC process was aimed against all illegal immigrants and the CAB will selectively benefit non-Muslim migrants into Assam. “We cannot accept the CAB at any cost…” said Sammujjal Bhattacharya, advisor to the All Assam Students Union. In the rest of the country, opposition parties have said they have a problem with the government linking India’s citizenship to religion.

Why is the opposition whining and crying? Peacefuls got 2 countries where thet have butchered kafir population, where will Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists etc from there go? If not acted upon, day is not far off when non-Muslim pop in Pak/BD will be zero (No Hindus will be left in Bangladesh after 30 years: Dr Abul Barkat). In Afg it is already the case, Sikhs have been wiped out.

 

*ing librats, all they do is appease Muslims, appease, appease, appease. That 15% migraine community seems to have such a stronghold in this country, how long can they get away bullying other communities? Sick of the word 'secular', most abused word in the English dictionary. How does this concern the Indian Muslim community? 

EK_KoMOWkAEcr0g.jpg

EK_CHp_U4AMAeZa.jpg

 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How on earth can muslims complain after what they did in 1947 and the alarmingly decrease in numbers of Hindus in Bangladesh. They love to play the secular card when in a minority.

 

They already have Pakistan and Bangladesh if they feel like they are oppressed in India, the Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistan and Bangladesh should therefore have the opportunity to move to India.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

How on earth can muslims complain after what they did in 1947 and the alarmingly decrease in numbers of Hindus in Bangladesh. They love to play the secular card when in a minority.

 

They already have Pakistan and Bangladesh if they feel like they are oppressed in India, the Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistan and Bangladesh should therefore have the opportunity to move to India.

They are feigning innocence and refuse to have any association with the ones who created Pakistan.  Their justification is that those who believed in Jinnahs Pakistan have left and we chose to stay back in India because we believe in Gandhis Secularism so any move favoring Hindus will be resisted by them to save secular Credentials of the country and establishment of Hindu Rashtra. 

 

Muslims believe in Supermacist Quran and Sharia when in Majority and have the power in their hands,  while they become the biggest supporters of Secular Constitution when in minority. 

 

There is a reason why Non Muslimspopulation is decreasing everywhere Muslims are in Majority while these Mohammedans keep doubling and tripling their numbers in India. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, javier26 said:

They are feigning innocence and refuse to have any association with the ones who created Pakistan.  Their justification is that those who believed in Jinnahs Pakistan have left and we chose to stay back in India because we believe in Gandhis Secularism so any move favoring Hindus will be resisted by them to save secular Credentials of the country and establishment of Hindu Rashtra. 

 

Muslims believe in Supermacist Quran and Sharia when in Majority and have the power in their hands,  while they become the biggest supporters of Secular Constitution when in minority. 

 

There is a reason why Non Muslimspopulation is decreasing everywhere Muslims are in Majority while these Mohammedans keep doubling and tripling their numbers in India. 

They only stayed behind for two reasons:

1. They were geographically very far from the Pakistan and Bangladesh border and found it difficult to move.

 

2. They faced no violence in the areas they remained in.

 

Kashmir shows what happens when muslims become a majority.

Edited by Ranvir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forefathers of today's Indian Muslims voted overwhelmingly in favor of Muslim League but chickened out of migrating there, now they shamelessly lie about them choosing Gandhi's secular vision. All a load of BS. Why are they bothered here? Muslims in neighboring countries live in sharia compliant societies, they should feel happy for them, no? This concerns Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Christians, Parsis who are being persecuted in the Islamic states, where else can they hope to find a better future? I don't care about the Shia and Ahmedi persecution other than embarassing the enemy, those 2 communities were at the forefront of partition and 1971 genocide. This step should have been taken decades ago, but we were being ruled by that useless Nehru dynasty, entire ecosystem was dhimmified. 

 

Pak/BD/Afg minorities want to flee those lands and live in India, converse is not true. When was the last time Muslims (apart from Dawood, jihadis) chose to legally/illegally migrate to Pak and plead for citizenship there? Food for thought. 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, sergio04 said:

China deserves to rule this world for their policy of handling Islam.

The mistake of keeping muslims during partition will haunt hindus forever. 

You should have followed the Sikh example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Sikhs did what had to be done in '47, now <2% peaceful population in East Punjab. Still they were too lenient when it came to Malerkotla, Sikhs there are facing difficulty now. 

The biggest problem is migrant muslims from UP and Bihar, but if they had been removed in 1947 from their homelands then we wouldn't have this problem.

 

2% is too much, it was less than 1% just a few years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

The biggest problem is migrant muslims from UP and Bihar, but if they had been removed in 1947 from their homelands then we wouldn't have this problem.

 

2% is too much, it was less than 1% just a few years ago.

In Bengal it is 30% :((

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indian Muslims and libtards have nothing at stake here, they aren't going to be persecuted or driven out of India. But opposing relief for stranded Hindus, Sikhs, Christians in Pakistan shows their nature, pure evil all those who are opposing this amendment. The way peacefuls are abusing India and dharmics today, why even stay in India with so much hatred in your hearts? Never had much loyalty towards India, why pretend as if this bill is going to make them lose their sense of belonging....it is like the case of jihadis who make silly excuses to justify their evil acts. 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

In Bengal it is 30% :((

The way Bengali Hindus think shows their lack of common sense. Have they not seen their fellow Bengali Hindus numbers decrease in Bangladesh and yet they still let these migrant muslim Bangladeshis migrate to India?

 

Bangladesh also has quite a low birth rate so it's not like the Hindus have been out bred by the muslims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone else heard this classic from some Hindus and Sikhs - 'Indian Muslims are different, they are not like Pakistanis'

 

These fools don't realise that there is no difference, it's just the numbers. The Indian muslims know they can only get away with so much when in a minority.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

The way Bengali Hindus think shows their lack of common sense. Have they not seen their fellow Bengali Hindus numbers decrease in Bangladesh and yet they still let these migrant muslim Bangladeshis migrate to India?

 

Bangladesh also has quite a low birth rate so it's not like the Hindus have been out bred by the muslims.

Bengali Hindus are the biggest dimwits on this planet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BJP has given up trying to garner Muslim votes. They don’t vote anyway despite the zillion schemes announced by the government for minorities. Next stop , UCC.

 

CAB  makes sense since Muslims got two regions for themselves why should India shelter more Muslims from those regions?. Demography is how they disrupt stability as seen in JK , Assam and Bengal. Nationwide NRC is still a distant dream but at least CAB might be passed.

 

LeLis are crying about Shias, Sufis and Ahmediyas. First, they are not identified as different sects by the constitution , but all are considered as the same, Muslims. Also, ask these libs to read about those communities’ role in 47. They supported enmasse for a Pakistan and helped clear the areas of Hindus, they didn’t know Pakistan would turn its back on them.

 

Libs are doing what is called as Negationasim. They want to forget about Islamic Iconoclasm, forget about Mughal Invasions and now forget about why Partition happened at all. Ostriches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ranvir said:

Has anyone else heard this classic from some Hindus and Sikhs - 'Indian Muslims are different, they are not like Pakistanis'

 

These fools don't realise that there is no difference, it's just the numbers. The Indian muslims know they can only get away with so much when in a minority.

 

 

Thats so true. this ought to be discussed daily

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Tibarn @Moochad @Stradlater Even if CAB is passed in RS what scope do milords have to overturn this? Will they cling on to basic structure, preamble etc to overturn the act? Fundamental rights is only for Indian citizens I think, will they be able to circumvent that? I don't know our constitution that well, what will the basis of the counter-argument? 

 

This is a huge moment in modern Indian history, trust libtards to throw spanner in the works. 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same day, another hit job. Islamists are on a global smear campaign, if serial offenders like Rana Ayyub aren't arrested soon we will only be doing harm to ourselves. They hate India, they hate dharmics, they are on a plan to destroy this country from within. 

 

Blood and Soil in Narendra Modi’s India

 

Showing complete disregard for law of the land, ‘journalist’ Rana Ayyub illegally smuggles a foreign journalist in Kashmir for New Yorker article

 

From ridiculous conspiracy theories to incredulous lies: 12 lies spread by The New Yorker in its propaganda piece

 

The New Yorker lies about 2002 Gujarat riots and former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya to defame PM Modi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Oldhere said:

Why are Lankan Hindu's not part of CAB?

 

DOnt BJP love our Tamil brothers from Lanka?

Don't compare Lanka with those Islamic hellholes. Tamil Hindus outside Jaffna aren't persecuted, many Tamils have risen to prominent positions and are doing well. Besides the conflict there is ethnic related and not because of religion. Also since it is a more liberal country things may improve in the future. 

CAB makes it abundantly clear "forced or compelled to seek shelter in India due to persecution on the ground of religion". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ranvir said:

Has anyone else heard this classic from some Hindus and Sikhs - 'Indian Muslims are different, they are not like Pakistanis'

 

These fools don't realise that there is no difference, it's just the numbers. The Indian muslims know they can only get away with so much when in a minority.

 

 

Have never come across a Sikh who says that,  its always the Hindus who are idealistic and prefer to live in delusions of Utopia. 

 

Some of the gems that we often hear :

 

1) Indian Muslims are True Muslims 

2) Indian Muslims Follow Real Islam 

3) Indian Muslims rejected Pakistan 

4) Indian Muslims are Indian First and then Muslims. 

5) Indian Muslims hate Pakistan more than Indian Hindus. 

6) Indian Muslims are the most patriotic citizens.

7) Indian Muslims are Secular,  Progressive, Open-Minded and Tolerant.

8) Indian Muslims inter marry with the Hindus , take a look at our Khan Superstars.

9) We are glad to have got rid of the Bad Apples in 1947 while the Good Apples ( Indian Muslims) remained in India. 

10) Quran teaches peace and tolerance,  Pakistanis misuse Islam for political purposes. 

11) There is Ram in Ramzaan and Ali in Diwali :facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Gollum said:

@Tibarn @Moochad @Stradlater Even if CAB is passed in RS what scope do milords have to overturn this? Will they cling on to basic structure, preamble etc to overturn the act? Fundamental rights is only for Indian citizens I think, will they be able to circumvent that? I don't know our constitution that well, what will the basis of the counter-argument? 

 

This is a huge moment in modern Indian history, trust libtards to throw spanner in the works. 

Laws made by legislation is only to be interpreted by judiciary. Only if it’s not clear, judiciary can decide based on the limits of constitution. They cannot overturn laws made by legislature. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, javier26 said:

Have never come across a Sikh who says that,  its always the Hindus who are idealistic and prefer to live in delusions of Utopia. 

 

Some of the gems that we often hear :

 

1) Indian Muslims are True Muslims 

2) Indian Muslims Follow Real Islam 

3) Indian Muslims rejected Pakistan 

4) Indian Muslims are Indian First and then Muslims. 

5) Indian Muslims hate Pakistan more than Indian Hindus. 

6) Indian Muslims are the most patriotic citizens.

7) Indian Muslims are Secular,  Progressive, Open-Minded and Tolerant.

8) Indian Muslims inter marry with the Hindus , take a look at our Khan Superstars.

9) We are glad to have got rid of the Bad Apples in 1947 while the Good Apples ( Indian Muslims) remained in India. 

10) Quran teaches peace and tolerance,  Pakistanis misuse Islam for political purposes. 

11) There is Ram in Ramzaan and Ali in Diwali :facepalm:

Lol, I have heard many of these before! That gave me a good laugh.

 

There are some Sikhs who say these things but probably more Hindus. It's probably because Sikhs pretty much eliminated all muslims in Punjab and dont have much interaction with them. However some Sikhs have helped muslim migrants from UP and Bihar build mosques or reopen old unused Punjabi mosques. I was livid when I visited Amritsar a couple of years ago and saw full mosques and halal food being sold.

 

There is a Sindhi guy at my work place who tells me Indians and Pakistanis are brothers. A Sindhi!

The same people who were forced out of their land by Pakistanis and as a result have lost a lot of their language and culture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Lol, I have heard many of these before! That gave me a good laugh.

 

There are some Sikhs who say these things but probably more Hindus. It's probably because Sikhs pretty much eliminated all muslims in Punjab and dont have much interaction with them. However some Sikhs have helped muslim migrants from UP and Bihar build mosques or reopen old unused Punjabi mosques. I was livid when I visited Amritsar a couple of years ago and saw full mosques and halal food being sold.

 

There is a Sindhi guy at my work place who tells me Indians and Pakistanis are brothers. A Sindhi!

The same people who were forced out of their land by Pakistanis and as a result have lost a lot of their language and culture.

WTF? Is that for real? :facepalm:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ranvir said:

Lol, I have heard many of these before! That gave me a good laugh.

 

There are some Sikhs who say these things but probably more Hindus. It's probably because Sikhs pretty much eliminated all muslims in Punjab and dont have much interaction with them. However some Sikhs have helped muslim migrants from UP and Bihar build mosques or reopen old unused Punjabi mosques. I was livid when I visited Amritsar a couple of years ago and saw full mosques and halal food being sold.

 

There is a Sindhi guy at my work place who tells me Indians and Pakistanis are brothers. A Sindhi!

The same people who were forced out of their land by Pakistanis and as a result have lost a lot of their language and culture.

There are dhimmi Sikhs as well, I have seen some of them defend Aurangzeb, what an insult to the Gurus. A few stories of Sikhs constructing mosques in Punjab, on Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji's balidan diwas an elderly Sikh donated his land to construct a mosque, I see crazy stories like this all the time. Sikh-Muslim friendship in India is growing stronger, no idea why but looks so abnormal. Many more dhimmis in Hindu community for sure but the trend is going in the opposite direction. 

 

Agree about Sindhis, I have interacted with many Sindhis in Bhopal in my childhood and was amazed at their love for Pakistan. I mean that is the weirdest thing imaginable, Sindhis !!! They have even taken this stupidity to Bollywood. @Jimmy Cliff is a Sindhi here, wish more from that community are like him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On topic: 

The Citizenship Amendment Bill essentially breaches the Assam Accord of 1985, where it was promised that those illegal migrants who entered India after a certain date in 1971 will be declared as foreigners. This is an understanding that the Union of India had with the state of Assam and the states of the north east in general. That promise is broken, the CAB states migrants from certain religious groups who are persecuted in India's neighbourhood and have moved into to India and stayed for 6 years can avail Indian citizenship*. You can already see the state governments of the North East resent and protest against this specific Bill.

 

In the long run, it would weaken India's relation with her North Eastern States.

 

(*) What even is citizenship? The Act doesn't bring any clarity on the issue. Currently, Citizenship is covered under two legislations. The Citizenship Act 1955 and Part II of the Constitution. None of these cover citizenship clearly and only talk about the citizenship clearly and mention only the prerequisites for a natural person to acquire Indian citizenship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

On topic: 

The Citizenship Amendment Bill essentially breaches the Assam Accord of 1985, where it was promised that those illegal migrants who entered India after a certain date in 1971 will be declared as foreigners. This is an understanding that the Union of India had with the state of Assam and the states of the north east in general. That promise is broken, the CAB states migrants from certain religious groups who are persecuted in India's neighbourhood and have moved into to India and stayed for 6 years can avail Indian citizenship*. You can already see the state governments of the North East resent and protest against this specific Bill.

 

In the long run, it would weaken India's relation with her North Eastern States.

 

(*) What even is citizenship? The Act doesn't bring any clarity on the issue. Currently, Citizenship is covered under two legislations. The Citizenship Act 1955 and Part II of the Constitution. None of these cover citizenship clearly and only talk about the citizenship clearly and mention only the prerequisites for a natural person to acquire Indian citizenship.

Some bumkum about NE states, there has been no outrage from these states. Assam wholeheartedly leads this as it is most affected by Muslim migrants from across BD. There is no response from you on why should India accept Muslims from Pak/BD whey were forcibly carved out of India for homing Muslims? Others are being prosecuted in Pak/BD and hence India is the only country for them as per the 2-nation theory. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Some bumkum about NE states, there has been no outrage from these states. Assam wholeheartedly leads this as it is most affected by Muslim migrants from across BD. There is no response from you on why should India accept Muslims from Pak/BD whey were forcibly carved out of India for homing Muslims? Others are being prosecuted in Pak/BD and hence India is the only country for them as per the 2-nation theory. 

https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/india/protests-against-cab-continue-in-assam.html

 

A simple google search will help you find many more protests. Besides, the CAB is a breach of the Assam Accords. You can google this too. 

Dear Sir, why not read keep your inherent biases aside, and read about the Bill and its predecessor legislation.

 

I have not mentioned anything about India accepting Muslims from Pak/BD. What are you on about?

Since when are you a fan of the 2 nation theory? The GoI India, irrespective of whoever is at the centre, has always been against that idea. 

Again, what are you even talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gollum said:

@Ranvir the only place peacefuls are in majority in Punjab is Malerkotla and they are showing their true colours. Many cases of kidnapping, love jihad, forced conversion of young Sikh/Hindu girls....Sikhs did a great job in '47 but not thorough. 

That's sad to hear about Malerkotla. See even though Sikhs went ballistic in 1947 they still showed some sentimentality towards the muslims of malerkotla for historical reasons. You literally cannot show any weakness. There is no Sikh majority town in Pakistan to my knowledge.

 

A big pet peeve of mine are the Sikh sufi singers like Hans Raj Hans, Satinder Sartaj, Harshdeep Kaur, Kanwar Grewal and the biggest offender Gurdas Khan. They all act and dress like Muhammedans whilst singing Allah hoo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Gollum said:

Indian Muslims and libtards have nothing at stake here, they aren't going to be persecuted or driven out of India. But opposing relief for stranded Hindus, Sikhs, Christians in Pakistan shows their nature, pure evil all those who are opposing this amendment. The way peacefuls are abusing India and dharmics today, why even stay in India with so much hatred in your hearts? Never had much loyalty towards India, why pretend as if this bill is going to make them lose their sense of belonging....it is like the case of jihadis who make silly excuses to justify their evil acts. 

Opposing escape of persecuted minorities In neighbourhood on grounds of religion is nothing but pure evil. If it is so hunky dory in neighbourhood for these minorities, libtards should migrate there. Yes, I am not chkg their religion Before asking them to emigrate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

On topic: 

The Citizenship Amendment Bill essentially breaches the Assam Accord of 1985, where it was promised that those illegal migrants who entered India after a certain date in 1971 will be declared as foreigners. This is an understanding that the Union of India had with the state of Assam and the states of the north east in general. That promise is broken, the CAB states migrants from certain religious groups who are persecuted in India's neighbourhood and have moved into to India and stayed for 6 years can avail Indian citizenship*. You can already see the state governments of the North East resent and protest against this specific Bill.

 

In the long run, it would weaken India's relation with her North Eastern States.

 

(*) What even is citizenship? The Act doesn't bring any clarity on the issue. Currently, Citizenship is covered under two legislations. The Citizenship Act 1955 and Part II of the Constitution. None of these cover citizenship clearly and only talk about the citizenship clearly and mention only the prerequisites for a natural person to acquire Indian citizenship.

If anything, north East is very much India, ULFA, Bodo militancy supported Sachin in those days. Now its not there at all, Not even to level of our Lal Salaam Gang in India

Edited by mishra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Mariyam said:

https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/india/protests-against-cab-continue-in-assam.html

 

A simple google search will help you find many more protests. Besides, the CAB is a breach of the Assam Accords. You can google this too. 

Dear Sir, why not read keep your inherent biases aside, and read about the Bill and its predecessor legislation.

 

I have not mentioned anything about India accepting Muslims from Pak/BD. What are you on about?

Since when are you a fan of the 2 nation theory? The GoI India, irrespective of whoever is at the centre, has always been against that idea. 

Again, what are you even talking about?

Sikhs hindus who have immigrated as refugees to India deserve their citizenship. This bill is about that. Indian muslims are Indians and they can live and prosper in India. Where is the issue here ? Muslims in BD and Pak are happy there so they can stay there. Its super simple. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The CAB will not apply to areas under the sixth schedule of the Constitution – which deals with autonomous tribal-dominated regions in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. The bill will also not apply to states that have the inner-line permit regime (Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Mizoram). These exceptions didn’t exist in the earlier version.

NE protests attempt at misleading by the usual gang....peacefuls, opposition. The only aggrieved parties here are libtards and peacefuls. 

 

For instance since when did they care about indigenous culture?

Quote

Sultan Mahmud Mirdha, a resident of Assam’s Barpeta district said, This bill will not only harm Assam but will also be harmful for the entire North East.

The Assamese language, culture will be finished. We don’t want the bill to be passed. I do not support the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. I strongly oppose this bill, Sultan Mahmud Mirdha said.

Why can't Indian Muslims openly admit that they are enjoying the brutalities inflicted upon minorities in neighboring countries their forefathers had a hand in building? They can't do it at the same level in India because of demographics but are clearly enjoying what is happening in Pak/BD/Afg. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Mariyam said:

A lot of anti Muslim bile on yet another thread

 

Nothing-to-See-15a34a2fc727c8.jpg

Muslims should desist from wiping out non-Muslims in areas where they are in majority, that way there would be no need for this bill. Unfortunately even in India's Kashmir valley kafirs weren't allowed to stay. 

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Mariyam said:

https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/india/protests-against-cab-continue-in-assam.html

 

A simple google search will help you find many more protests. Besides, the CAB is a breach of the Assam Accords. You can google this too. 

Dear Sir, why not read keep your inherent biases aside, and read about the Bill and its predecessor legislation.

 

I have not mentioned anything about India accepting Muslims from Pak/BD. What are you on about?

Since when are you a fan of the 2 nation theory? The GoI India, irrespective of whoever is at the centre, has always been against that idea. 

Again, what are you even talking about?

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/northeastern-states-to-be-shielded-from-citizenship-law-impact/article30126585.ece

 

There is also talks of sheilding them. The protest is a non-starter, just a training ground to breed future politicians.  

 

The OP was about the liberal meltdown because Ms were excluded. Hence, I brought it up.  I am not a fan of TNT. But since it has happened, I blame the Muslim leadership of that era to bhadkao Muslims to vote for it. Since it has happened, it is very much necessary to recognize the fact that Ms are fleeing these areas and migrating to India and it has to be stopped. They are not being prosecuted but are fleeing for economic or political reasons. What was the reason for Rohingyas to settle in Jammu of all places. Demography changes is the next threat to National security. Yes, I am talking about the same issue raised by OP and reason for intellegentsia in India crying about the loss of original idea of India. Yes, the idea has changed now, to a newer India. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to take up Mamata's thought. Take her theory a bit forward, lets open our borders for everyone. Let anyone come and go per their wishes. No paper required , no checking , whoever wants can come settle in India. Have access to all the services which are provided to indian citizens. If there is some anti india demonstration then also its fine cause police can shoot rapist but its a breach of my fundamental right if i shoot at stone throwers or those destroying govt property. 

 

Now that would be an India everyone would want to live in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peacefuls pretend to believe that Israel persecutes its minority more than Muslim majority counries :hysterical:

 

Israel gives more rights to its minority citizens than every single Islamic regime in history...the absolute worst of Israel is better than what happens on average in peaceful countries. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...