straighttalk Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Strictly based on form andRP$ (Runs per dollar) Jaisurya Ganguly Laxman Ponting Dravid Luke Ronchi jaffer munaf sreesanth rp singh some spinner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketics Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 that team will beat chennai 5-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f.b.m Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Haha, tics is so wound up by all the winning and gloating that there is approximately one (1) message in every post of his. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 pakistan 20/20 team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amits Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 jayasurya ganguly ponting symonds - in here as he got $1350000 and his bowling cost hyderabad 2 matches dravid kallis ronchi(w) rp singh sreesanth sunil joshi munaf jaffer not included as he got only $150000, which is just right looking at his performance till now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohan495 Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Strictly based on form andRP$ (Runs per dollar) Jaisurya Ganguly Laxman Ponting Dravid Luke Ronchi jaffer munaf sreesanth rp singh some spinner last time i checked Laxman was not out on 37, and hes only worth 375 and is leading a side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalCopy Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Believe me, his 37 no would not have mattered one bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straighttalk Posted April 30, 2008 Author Share Posted April 30, 2008 last time i checked Laxman was not out on 37' date=' and hes only worth 375 and is leading a side.[/quote'] with all due respect vvs laxman deserves to lead this side with rahul dravid assisting him in the team selection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohan495 Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Believe me' date=' his 37 no would not have mattered one bit![/quote'] .....why not....:eyedance: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straighttalk Posted May 1, 2008 Author Share Posted May 1, 2008 .....why not....:eyedance: it was a gilchrist show that day.....even if laxman had been out for 0..and none of the other batsmen had scored anything but just ensured that they had stayed in the crease for 10 more balls ..gilly would have got the 37 tat laxman scored...unfortunately laxman played the sidekick role to perfection..the losers 2020 team is comprised of players who are not capable of producing 30 out of 20 balls consistently.i will change my opinion if laxman and all others in the team proves me wrong.and blv me i'll be very very happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts