rkt.india Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 removed. please don't post private emails! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msb1991 Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 The subtext being "leave me alone", lol. Thanks for the information though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Show_stopper Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 The subtext being "leave me alone"' date=' lol. Thanks for the information though.[/quote'] :hysterical: Rkt..i think you have pestered this guy enough and this is as much as he is likely to give us. I have been and will be a believer...till 1st week of March that is.Thats the deadline for me.If he exists he is playing in IPL 2009 else..oh well it was good while it lasted:cantstop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triam Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 atul sharma is hiding atul sharma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted February 18, 2009 Author Share Posted February 18, 2009 You know, let me just ride on this. OK, so he is being kept behind the curtains. And, if Modi wants to unveil a tremendous new talent thus making good on his promise that IPL will take Indian Cricket forward while at the same time encouraging raw talent around the country, this just looks a little feasible. So, if he wants to really make an impact, do you think he will want to reveal him in the first match itself or somewhere in the middle when the interest may begin to wane? March 1st is near enough. Let's see. Although, I'm surprising myself by not believing this. I mean, I eat up Astral Projection, Telepathy and Remote Viewing without a second thought :dontknow: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 :hysterical: Rkt..i think you have pestered this guy enough and this is as much as he is likely to give us. I have been and will be a believer...till 1st week of March that is.Thats the deadline for me.If he exists he is playing in IPL 2009 else..oh well it was good while it lasted:cantstop: Me too think like that......but it is so fascinating to hear like that kind of bowler even if he does not exist, this is the thing Indian cricket is searching for the last 75 years, an Indian bowler who can take batsman's breath away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 I have had a chat with one of the Indian past cricketer (that knows heaps about fast bowling) and he mentioned one of the fast bowlers that Ian Pont introduced to as "Ordinary". I don't need to mention anymore I guess. If Atul Sharma can prove the Indian cricket legend false, good on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 I have had a chat with one of the Indian past cricketer (that knows heaps about fast bowling) and he mentioned one of the fast bowlers that Ian Pont introduced to as "Ordinary". I don't need to mention anymore I guess. If Atul Sharma can prove the Indian cricket legend false, go when u had that chat, who was that person u talked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desi Cartman Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 who is hiding Atul Sharma A: Gambit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wicket Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 You know, let me just ride on this. OK, so he is being kept behind the curtains. And, if Modi wants to unveil a tremendous new talent thus making good on his promise that IPL will take Indian Cricket forward while at the same time encouraging raw talent around the country, this just looks a little feasible. You're assuming Modi actually will make good on his promise. The man's a scumbag of the worst order and a criminal out to just make money. I highly doubt it. Also, a few other questions: - If signings of other nobodies like Rob Quiney and Dirk Nannes can make headlines, why wouldn't Sharma be mentioned? - If Sharma's as hot a prospect as people think, why is the team that has him keeping so quiet if they do have him, when all other players are being shown off? - If we assume that Sharma's a real talent and in the IPL as a tremendous secret... then how is it that nothing's leaked yet? Come on, this is a country and board where confidential emails from a coach to a board leak word for word through the papers, private selection meeting comments get plastered all over the sports pages and almost every word uttered under a cricketer's breath is reported. If there was a secret, someone would have spilled it by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 You're assuming Modi actually will make good on his promise. The man's a scumbag of the worst order and a criminal out to just make money. I highly doubt it. Also, a few other questions: - If signings of other nobodies like Rob Quiney and Dirk Nannes can make headlines, why wouldn't Sharma be mentioned? - If Sharma's as hot a prospect as people think, why is the team that has him keeping so quiet if they do have him, when all other players are being shown off? - If we assume that Sharma's a real talent and in the IPL as a tremendous secret... then how is it that nothing's leaked yet? Come on, this is a country and board where confidential emails from a coach to a board leak word for word through the papers, private selection meeting comments get plastered all over the sports pages and almost every word uttered under a cricketer's breath is reported. If there was a secret, someone would have spilled it by now. This is exactly why an Atul Sharma being hided by anyone is impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 But then from where this name came suddenly, what is the purpose Ian Pont solves with this story? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted February 20, 2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2009 You're assuming Modi actually will make good on his promise. The man's a scumbag of the worst order and a criminal out to just make money. I highly doubt it. Also, a few other questions: - If signings of other nobodies like Rob Quiney and Dirk Nannes can make headlines, why wouldn't Sharma be mentioned? - If Sharma's as hot a prospect as people think, why is the team that has him keeping so quiet if they do have him, when all other players are being shown off? - If we assume that Sharma's a real talent and in the IPL as a tremendous secret... then how is it that nothing's leaked yet? Come on, this is a country and board where confidential emails from a coach to a board leak word for word through the papers, private selection meeting comments get plastered all over the sports pages and almost every word uttered under a cricketer's breath is reported. If there was a secret, someone would have spilled it by now. Ah, seems like I'm losing my english. I know he is all about the money. I wanted to convey that this, if there is a "this", would be a good publicity stunt. But, yes all your points are valid. Which is why I have a hard time sploorging for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambit Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Bring back Mulder and Scully to find out about X-File case number 434359294 - Atul 100MPH Sharma. :cantstop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Ah, seems like I'm losing my english. I know he is all about the money. I wanted to convey that this, if there is a "this", would be a good publicity stunt. But, yes all your points are valid. Which is why I have a hard time sploorging for him. I have got Ian Pont's mail and he said that news about Atul Sharma is under media embargo so find out what it is and let me know too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Any media person here to tell what is media embargo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambit Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 poof. bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Any media person here to tell what is media embargo In journalism and public relations, a news embargo or press embargo is a request by a source that the information or news provided by that source not be published until a certain date or certain conditions have been met. The understanding is that if the embargo is broken by reporting before then, the source will retaliate by restricting access to further information by that journalist or his publication, giving them a long-term disadvantage relative to more cooperative outlets. They are often used by businesses making a product announcement, by medical journals, and by government officials announcing policy initiatives; the media is given advance knowledge of details being held secret so that reports can be prepared to coincide with the announcement date and yet still meet press time. In theory, press embargoes reduce inaccuracy in the reporting of breaking stories by reducing the incentive for journalists to cut corners in hopes of "scooping" the competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msb1991 Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 In journalism and public relations' date=' a news embargo or press embargo is a request by a source that the information or news provided by that source not be published until a certain date or certain conditions have been met. The understanding is that if the embargo is broken by reporting before then, the source will retaliate by restricting access to further information by that journalist or his publication, giving them a long-term disadvantage relative to more cooperative outlets. They are often used by businesses making a product announcement, by medical journals, and by government officials announcing policy initiatives; the media is given advance knowledge of details being held secret so that reports can be prepared to coincide with the announcement date and yet still meet press time. In theory, press embargoes reduce inaccuracy in the reporting of breaking stories by reducing the incentive for journalists to cut corners in hopes of "scooping" the competition.[/quote'] Yeh, what he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 removed. please don't post private emails! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts