patriot Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 ...Similar average of 50 odd+ . But Veeru's strike rate is nearly 80 compared to Pietersen's in the early 60's . For an opener thats simply fantabulous. Yet the English and Aussie experts make hype Pietersen as if he is a batter from Jupiter. Pietersen has not even come close to matching the utterly demoralizing effect that Veeru has had on bowlers in test match cricket. Link to comment
Guest Shivani Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Pietersen has not even come close to matching the utterly demoralizing effect that Veeru has had on bowlers in test match cricket. :agree: :crazy4: Link to comment
Jai Ho Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Pieterson is good indeed but Sehwag is in class of his own, no competition... Link to comment
DomainK Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 I don't think anyone has taken anything away from Sehwag. KP is more in news and discussion because of the Ashes. And with the number of test matches India plans to play in future, I have a feeling that Swhwag won't be much in discussion. Link to comment
rahulrulezz Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Why do we have care to about some1s opinion... if they find Peterson better then be it... Link to comment
Bradman99 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Want the Aussies to suck up to India ?? Link to comment
Sachinism Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Obviously their own country men are going to praise them like crazy. In India you'll hear unlimited praise for Indian players, what about the other players in the world? Link to comment
spectre Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 In test cricket, there can be no cricketer in the world who can send shivers down the opposition, merely by his presence in the middle, other than the maverick SEHWAG He is so devastating and demoralizing not even Sachin, Lara or Ponting or whoever Link to comment
Lord Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 tbh,Pietersen is more skilled than Sehwag.i have seen him play a Warne ball well outside legstump to wide Mid-on.not too many batsmen can do that.n Sehwag is yet to prove himself in SA,Eng,he struggles against the swinging ball n that is a fact we cant deny.Sehwag,while being devastating will always give the bowlers a chance while Pietersen will look assured n safe even while attacking.thats why Pietersen is more dangerous Link to comment
MUMBAISKIPPER Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 sehwag's 2nd innings of test matches he has played so far are not as good as his first innings.His 2nd innings test average is pathetic given the talent he has.Also he has scored most of his centuries in his first innings.KP is bit more balanced. Link to comment
Jai Ho Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 KP more talented but Sehwag more dangerous. Link to comment
MUMBAISKIPPER Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 KP more talented but Sehwag more dangerous. both are talented and dangerous...its players like them keep test cricket alive. Link to comment
DomainK Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Recommended Reading Brilliant piece.:hatsoff: Link to comment
undisputed Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Sehwag is a talented player, im not the biggest fan of test cricket but when he is on i always like to watch, because i know while he is there he will make his runs quick.. his strike rate is amazing in all format's of the game, he plays proper cricketing shots and not just slogs. the comparison with pietersen is a tough one, becuase KP is regarded as one of the finest in the world. Link to comment
Ram Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 For some odd reason, guys like KP and Flintoff have always been the blue-eyed boys of the mainstream international media. Compare the amount of coverage/attention they to get, with someone like Chanderpaul or an Anil Kumble who have been far more effective in international cricket and its easy to fathom how the amount of coverage you get is not proportional to your on-field achievements. Could it be that people like Sehwag, Chanderpaul and Kumble just take to the field, do their job silently and effectively and stop at that? Could it be that they don’t celebrate a wicket or a 100 in style like Freddie does? Or could it also be that they don’t give catchy phrases when confronted by the media like KP does? Link to comment
Dhondy Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 For some odd reason, guys like KP and Flintoff have always been the blue-eyed boys of the mainstream international media. Compare the amount of coverage/attention they to get, with someone like Chanderpaul or an Anil Kumble who have been far more effective in international cricket and its easy to fathom how the amount of coverage you get is not proportional to your on-field achievements. Could it be that people like Sehwag, Chanderpaul and Kumble just take to the field, do their job silently and effectively and stop at that? Could it be that they don’t celebrate a wicket or a 100 in style like Freddie does? Or could it also be that they don’t give catchy phrases when confronted by the media like KP does? I'd have liked the comparison to be between Kallis and Flintoff. In every parameter you could conceivably think of, batting, bowling, catching and longevity, Kallis blows Flintoff out of the water. The former is the greatest fast bowling all-rounder that ever lived. Yet, do you see him rated ahead of Flintoff, let alone the likes of Imran, Botham, Kapil, and Hadley? The reason you don't is because of his lack of flamboyance, his eschewing of controversy and self promotion. If Flintoff has one thing in common with Botham and Imran, it is his capacity to promote himself. He milked every femtolitre of his Ashes performance in 2005 to dryness, resorting to mouthing "Oh Freddie Freddie" himself after taking wickets. Newspaper interviews, TV shows followed, his bank balance burgeoned by millions. He has the same penchant for courting controversy as Botham or Imran. If Botham had a reputation as the grass snorter and Imran as the womaniser (deservedly or undeservedly), Freddie is the teenage boozer who never grew up. Apparently, it adds to his charm. Link to comment
fineleg Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 It will be interesting to list a "Showoff XI vs Modest XI" cricket team list. Many Indian stars SRT, RD, AK, VVS will make the latter list. Flintoff, Yuvi, KP, Ponting et.al will make the Showoff XI list. Link to comment
Ram Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 I'd have liked the comparison to be between Kallis and Flintoff. In every parameter you could conceivably think of, batting, bowling, catching and longevity, Kallis blows Flintoff out of the water. The former is the greatest fast bowling all-rounder that ever lived. Yet, do you see him rated ahead of Flintoff, let alone the likes of Imran, Botham, Kapil, and Hadley? The reason you don't is because of his lack of flamboyance, his eschewing of controversy and self promotion. If Flintoff has one thing in common with Botham and Imran, it is his capacity to promote himself. He milked every femtolitre of his Ashes performance in 2005 to dryness, resorting to mouthing "Oh Freddie Freddie" himself after taking wickets. Newspaper interviews, TV shows followed, his bank balance burgeoned by millions. He has the same penchant for courting controversy as Botham or Imran. If Botham had a reputation as the grass snorter and Imran as the womaniser (deservedly or undeservedly), Freddie is the teenage boozer who never grew up. Apparently, it adds to his charm. Couldn’t agree with the post more. I suppose one can say that every star (cricketer) has the right to take maximum mileage out of their professional career, but the thing that I, as a cricket fan, would be most concerned about is what the general cricketing public thinks of these cricketers. To my mind at least, there’s absolutely no comparison between Flintoff and Kallis, in terms of their cricketing achievements. But I am concerned that there are a sizeable number of people out there who differ with my opinion. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 On topic: I think Sehwag's 201 in Galle and his triple centuries have pulled him ahead in this race. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now