For Gambhir, it was a Test Match ban rite away

[Cricketics]

During the First Ashes test, Stuart Broad made a physical contact with Peter Siddle. Nothing happend to Broad. No ban nothing. It was said that it all happend because of the high intensity and the heat bla bla Howerver, Gambhir gets a ban for it if he rightly tries to make a phyical contact with Watson, who has provked him while he was taking a single.

[Guest Shivani]

During the First Ashes test, Stuart Broad made a physical contact with Peter Siddle. Nothing happend to Broad. No ban nothing. It was said that it all happend because of the high intensity and the heat bla bla Howerver, Gambhir gets a ban for it if he rightly tries to make a phyical contact with Watson, who has provked him while he was taking a single.

Ban Broad :((

[Rajiv]

Ban Broad :((

The father or son?

[Mr. Wicket]

Given the way Stuart Broad bowls, do you THINK Australia wants him banned? Broad in the side = a load of overhyped rubbish, therefore Australia won't complain. Now if he was doing as well as Gambhir was...

[nikred]

The father or son?

both :hitler:

[Bradman99]

Given the way Stuart Broad bowls, do you THINK Australia wants him banned? Broad in the side = a load of overhyped rubbish, therefore Australia won't complain. Now if he was doing as well as Gambhir was...

So true, I'd want him NOT to get banned! haha.. I didn't see the incident mind, was it bad?

[Lord]

Gambhir's one was blatantly intentional n hence the ban.he had also been given a warning in the Afridi incident. Broad,though intentional,masked it pretty well.it looked unintentional