India before the British Rule, some myths busted

[kabira]

http://www.newindpress.com/column/News.asp?Topic=-97&Title=S%2EGurumurthy&ID=IE620061115230938&nDate=&Sub=&Cat=& Not many know the Indian past he had discovered! Thursday November 16 2006 09:31 IST S Gurumurthy "What is it that keeps the country down", asked the speaker. A young man in the audience replied unhesitatingly: "Undoubtedly the institution of caste that kept the majority low castes and the society backward" and added "it continues". The speaker replied, "May be". But, pausing for a moment, he added, "May not be". Shocked, the young man angrily asked him to explain his "may-not-be" theory. The speaker calmly mentioned just one fact that clinched the debate. He said, "Before the British rule in India, over two-thirds - yes, two-thirds - of the Indian kings belonged to what is today known as the Other Backward Castes (OBCs). "It is the British," he said, "who robbed the OBCs - the ruling class running all socio-economic institutions - of their power, wealth and status." So it was not the upper caste which usurped the OBCs of their due position in the society? The speaker?s assertion that it was not so was founded on his study - unbelievably painstaking study for years and decades in the archives in India, England and Germany. He could not be maligned as a ?saffron? ideologue and what he said could not be dismissed thus. He was Dharampal, a Gandhian in ceaseless search of truth like his preceptor Gandhi himself was, but a Gandhian with a difference. He ran no ashram on state aid to do ?Gandhigiri?. Admitting that "he and those like him do not know much about our own society", the young man who questioned Dharampal - Banwari is his name - became his student. By meticulous research of the British sources over decades, Dharampal demolished the myth that India was backward educationally or economically when the British entered. Citing the Christian missionary William Adam?s report on indigenous education in Bengal and Bihar in 1835 and 1838, Dharampal established that at that time there were 100,000 schools in Bengal, one school for about 500 boys; that the indigenous medical system that included inoculation against small-pox. He also proved by reference to other materials that Adam?s record was ?no legend?. He relied on Sir Thomas Munroe?s report to the Governor at about the same time to prove similar statistics about schools in Madras. He also found that the education system in the Punjab during the Maharaja Ranjit Singh?s rule was equally extensive. He estimated that the literary rate in India before the British was higher than that in England. Citing British public records he established, on the contrary, that ?British had no tradition of education or scholarship or philosophy from 16th to early 18th century, despite Shakespeare, Bacon, Milton, Newton, etc?. Till then education and scholarship in the UK was limited to select elite. He cited Alexander Walker?s Note on Indian education to assert that it was the monitorial system of education borrowed from India that helped Britain to improve, in later years, school attendance which was just 40, 000, yes just that, in 1792. He then compared the educated people?s levels in India and England around 1800. The population of Madras Presidency then was 125 lakhs and that of England in 1811 was 95 lakhs. Dharampal found that during 1822-25 the number of those in ordinary schools in Madras Presidency was around 1.5 lakhs and this was after great decay under a century of British intervention. As against this, the number attending schools in England was half - yes just half - of Madras Presidency?s, namely a mere 75,000. And here to with more than half of it attending only Sunday schools for 2-3 hours! Dharampal also established that in Britain ?elementary system of education at people?s level remained unknown commodity? till about 1800! Again he exploded the popularly held belief that most of those attending schools must have belonged to the upper castes particularly Brahmins and, again with reference to the British records, proved that the truth was the other way round. During 1822-25 the share of the Brahmin students in the indigenous schools in Tamil-speaking areas accounted for 13 per cent in South Arcot to some 23 per cent in Madras while the backward castes accounted for 70 per cent in Salem and Tirunelveli and 84 per cent in South Arcot. The situation was almost similar in Malayalam, Oriya and Kannada-speaking areas, with the backward castes dominating the schools in absolute numbers. Only in the Telugu-speaking areas the share of the Brahmins was higher and varied from 24 to 46 per cent. Dharampal?s work proved Mahatma Gandhi?s statement at Chatham House in London on October 20, 1931 that "India today is more illiterate than it was fifty or hundred years ago" completely right. Not many know of Dharampal or of his work because they have still not heard of the Indian past he had discovered. After, long after, Dharampal had established that pre-British India was not backward a Harvard University Research in the year 2005 (India?s Deindustrialisation in the 18th and 19th Centuries by David Clingingsmith and Jeffrey G Williamson) among others affirmed that "while India produced about 25 percent of world industrial output in 1750, this figure had fallen to only 2 percent by 1900." The Harvard University Economic Research also established that the Industrial employment in India also declined from about 30 to 8.5 per cent between 1809-13 and 1900, thus turning the Indian society backward. PS: This great warrior who established the truth - the truth that was least known - that India was not backward when the British came, but became backward only after they came, is no more. He passed away two weeks ago on October 26, 2006, at Sevagram at Warda. http://www.newindpress.com/column/News.asp?Topic=-97&Title=S%2EGurumurthy&ID=IE620061115230938&nDate=&Sub=&Cat=&

[Gambit]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted Great article! A real eye opener.

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted

The speaker calmly mentioned just one fact that clinched the debate. He said, "Before the British rule in India, over two-thirds - yes, two-thirds - of the Indian kings belonged to what is today known as the Other Backward Castes (OBCs).

OBC preferential treatment is unadultereated politics has no basis in reality. In fact most celebrated Indian rulers dynasty that is Marya dynasty belongs to OBC of today. Chandergupta Marya was kurm same caste as Nitish Kumar and they come under Bc section and get mandal commission doles.

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted May u rest in peace sir.. Pritich were biggest parasite rough estimate is they sucked godds resources worth of 13 trillion dollar during their 200 year occupation

[CC1981]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted Regardless, caste must go.

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted

Regardless, caste must go.

Achieveing complete lack of discrimination is utopian target and will never be achieved. HUman being is hard-wired to achieve some distinguished state and then try to adhere to it. Heck as a individial we have complete internal divisions often our one part doesn't have comunication by other be it by design or inadeuqate intellectual ability. Point here being made is that caste per se was not devised as a tool of discrimination although it did degenrate into one in course of time as is the basic human instinct. The data produced by this gentean vouches for this fact. If u are interested in further studying the evolition of caste systems Dr Radhakrishanan's "Hindu view of life" is the book to look for.

[CC1981]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted

Achieveing complete lack of discrimination is utopian target and will never be achieved.

Agreed. But it doesn't mean we stop trying. 100% purification isnt possible either. Doesnt mean we give up on purification plants for various goods.

HUman being is hard-wired to achieve some distinguished state and then try to adhere to it. Heck as a individial we have complete internal divisions often our one part doesn't have comunication by other be it by design or inadeuqate intellectual ability.

Disagree. Its not hardwired, whats hardwired is lazyness-physical or mental. What you describe above is just societerial lazyness and the byproduct of which is ignorance.

Point here being made is that caste per se was not devised as a tool of discrimination although it did degenrate into one in course of time as is the basic human instinct.

I agree with that and i also know that caste started as essentially an 'economic demarcation' in similar ways we have the service sector or the manufacturing sector, etc etc. But its not a question of what it started with- as the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Its become something horrendous and serves no purpose that can be seen as good. Therefore, it is yet another ancient benign thing that's changed color and twisted beyond recognition. Its a monster today and therefore, should go.

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: India before the British Rule, some myths busted

Achieveing complete lack of discrimination is utopian target and will never be achieved.

Agreed. But it doesn't mean we stop trying. 100% purification isnt possible either. Doesnt mean we give up on purification plants for various goods. CERTAINLY not but we should also not lose the bigger picture while getting fully consumed by this target.

HUman being is hard-wired to achieve some distinguished state and then try to adhere to it. Heck as a individial we have complete internal divisions often our one part doesn't have comunication by other be it by design or inadeuqate intellectual ability.

Disagree. Its not hardwired, whats hardwired is lazyness-physical or mental. What you describe above is just societerial lazyness and the byproduct of which is ignorance. Well I differ had it not been hard-wired slacking would not have been fun we are selifhs by nature like any other creature alot of effort goesin order to make it otherwise.

Point here being made is that caste per se was not devised as a tool of discrimination although it did degenrate into one in course of time as is the basic human instinct.

I agree with that and i also know that caste started as essentially an 'economic demarcation' in similar ways we have the service sector or the manufacturing sector, etc etc. But its not a question of what it started with- as the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Its become something horrendous and serves no purpose that can be seen as good. Therefore, it is yet another ancient benign thing that's changed color and twisted beyond recognition. Its a monster today and therefore, should go.

Well we agree on something:-). India is putitng all out efforts in fact in our exuberance to wipe out historical wrongs we are again perpetrating wrong only difference is that this time on receving end are brahmins. As Have been mentioned in other thred brahmins have much higher percentage of BPL people than socalled OBCs.