who cares???its just t20!!!

[don_corleone840]

i am surprised by sudden romance of english and aussie people with t20 cricket.that shows that how hypocrite these people are. i am waiting for the columns of some old hypocrite english and australian commentator if england win t20 pajama world cup as they were the one who discovered this phrase "WHO CARES ???ITS JUST T20".:finger::finger:

[Bradman99]

It has been gaining in importance in Australia in the last year and a bit and is now taken seriously and I think you can see that by the way players have been given contracts based purely on 20/20's. So I think this is just a bitter comment..

[Roshanrocks]

England and Australia were pretty serious at this year's world cup. Both the teams never gave any impression of taking it easy.

[DomainK]

Actually it's good that in such a short time we will have three different world champions in this format. It's good for the format's future and cricket's future as well. It's good to see teams like Afghanistan play in such huge events. Whether we like it or not, T20 is the future. Tests will remain the purest form for a chosen few, but T20 is the way to grow.

[Desi Cartman]

It has been gaining in importance in Australia in the last year and a bit and is now taken seriously and I think you can see that by the way players have been given contracts based purely on 20/20's. So I think this is just a bitter comment..

CA always wanted their team to win, but its for the first time I saw my colleagues ask about the T20 WC.. till last year it was *just* T20. So I kinda agree with the OP.

[meloveindia]

still ... if pointing/clarke had a wish to choose ONLY 1 winning with option from "Ashes or T20 WC" - 10 times out of 10 they would choose Ashes importance of T20 is largely due to IPL

[vvvslaxman]

Their IPL rates will improve dramatically. I bet Watson will be bought for nothing less than 1 million.

[asterix]

Any ICC event is important..

[Bradman99]

CA always wanted their team to win' date=' but its for the first time I saw my colleagues ask about the T20 WC.. till last year it was *just* T20. So I kinda agree with the OP.[/quote'] Yes, for the first year and a bit that was the case. But lately as it has now become a genuine new form of the game, they have started to take it seriously. It's been over a year now since they have taken it 100% seriously.

[satyam1729]

Yes' date=' for the first year and a bit that was the case. But lately as it has now become a genuine new form of the game, they have started to take it seriously. It's been over a year now since they have taken it 100% seriously.[/quote'] Congratulations.

[Precambrian]

i am surprised by sudden romance of english and aussie people with t20 cricket.that shows that how hypocrite these people are. i am waiting for the columns of some old hypocrite english and australian commentator if england win t20 pajama world cup as they were the one who discovered this phrase "WHO CARES ???ITS JUST T20".:finger::finger:

I am waiting for BCCI hater Hideous Gideon Hiagh's next article. :finger:

[Bradman99]

Congratulations.

?

[satyam1729]

?

For winning T20 WC

[Precambrian]

It has been gaining in importance in Australia in the last year and a bit and is now taken seriously and I think you can see that by the way players have been given contracts based purely on 20/20's. So I think this is just a bitter comment..

I don't think any T20 specialist got a contract this year http://www.cricinfo.com/australia/content/story/455023.html

Warner and Hussey suffer from being restricted to international Twenty20 duty and there are concerns, including from the Australian Cricketers' Association, that the lack of incentives for these types of specialists could end in them abandoning their domestic commitments for lucrative international spoils. Both Warner and Hussey have been tried in one-day internationals without sustained success, which restricts their attractiveness to the selectors. Players are rated between one and 20 on their overall limited-overs ability, not just their T20 exploits, before that score is combined with a Test ranking. It's almost impossible to make the list while only appearing in the game's newest format, although Shaun Tait achieved it with help from his one-day potential.

[Pioneer]

Actually it's good that in such a short time we will have three different world champions in this format. It's good for the format's future and cricket's future as well. It's good to see teams like Afghanistan play in such huge events. Whether we like it or not' date=' T20 is the future. Tests will remain the purest form for a chosen few, but T20 is the way to grow.[/quote'] That's true I agree, T20 is the future, it is already spreading to places such as the US. Last summer I was getting a haircut in Boston and the barber literally knew everything about T20, the World Cup, who won and everything. I was pretty surprised but it shows how this format will quickly catch on in countries who have little knowledge of cricket. But the guy thought Dubai was in India,...oh well these Americans :haha:

[Bradman99]

For winning T20 WC

Not over yet!

[Bradman99]

I don't think any T20 specialist got a contract this year http://www.cricinfo.com/australia/content/story/455023.html

Hmm your right, I thought wrong. Still Tait I guess.

[Zelig]

The Big Bash crowd outscored the ones that turned up to watch pajama kirkut:giggle:

[nballa]

who cares? are you serious? we had an effin parade in mumbai attended by politicians when we won in 07. every loss hurts. thats why its called a loss. if no one cares there won't be a loser.

[riya]

who cares? are you serious? we had an effin parade in mumbai attended by politicians when we won in 07. every loss hurts. thats why its called a loss. if no one cares there won't be a loser.

I can still feel ur pain in ''loss'',still hurting isn't it?.Well i am talking about Indian loss.:((