Jump to content

'Only Ponting can beat Tendulkar's record'


Andy

Recommended Posts

Ponting was the best player for 3 years of last decade, similarly Tendulkar was the best for 3-4 years in last decade, there are few other players too who did well one year each, eg kallis, yousuf etc so in short, 10 years is way too long period to compare players just like 120 years is way too long period to compare batsmen of 1930s to of 90s

Link to comment
Err, the decade is from 2001 to 2010, duh. If i give you 20 1 rupee coins the first ten rupees will be from 1 to 10 and next from 11 to 20! but i am not surprised that many people get confused about this. After all, didnt the world celebrate the new millenium on Jan 1 2000 instead of Jan 1 2001 :hysterical:
Link to comment
now that its been proved no one reads OP here is something for the side discussion going on; ponting never faced the best bowling lineup of last decade and Sachin never got to face the worst bowling line ' date=' now factor that in your discussion[/quote'] But that doesn't matter :woot:
Link to comment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade As per this - decade can be any arbitrary period of 10 years. However, ... Since the common calendar starts from the year 1, its first full decade contained the years from 1 to 10, the second decade from 11 to 20, and so on.[6] So while the "1960s" comprises the years 1960 to 1969, the "197th decade" spans 1961 to 1970.
Yup, I knew it that there were a million idiots at Times Square celebrating the new millenium in '00 with all the fan fare of every reporting agency. Should have just rung up Tendulkar bhakts and Wikipedia for the facts.
Link to comment
Yup' date=' I knew it that there were a million idiots at Times Square celebrating the new millenium in '00 with all the fan fare of every reporting agency. Should have just rung up Tendulkar bhakts and Wikipedia for the facts.[/quote'] Being in the company of millions of idiots hardly makes one right.
Link to comment
I dunno what my post had to do with Tendulkar. But do you really think the decade started from 2000 and not 2001?
No, I don't 'think' the decade started in 2000, the vast majority of the world accepts that it started in 2000, except for some lunatics like you, who would go to the extent of redefining a calendar as long as Tendulkar comes across better than everyone. It must take some caliber to be of a tool of the level to claim 2000 was part of the 1990s decade. :laugh:
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...