Harbhajan Singh vs Saqlain Mushtaq

[El_Pipita]

He might be retired but whatever man, so who is the better out of the two? Discuss dudes. :winky:

[KKR88]

i am an indian, but saqlain alone with murali and warne were the best spin boweler ever. period. bhaji is a kid compared to those three

[vvvslaxman]

another comparison thread?

[Ustad]

Mushtaq dude! No contest!

[ganeshran]

In ODIs : Saqlain In Tests : Bhajji

[chota_prakash]

Is this a joke ? Bhagee always shits his pants when the pressure is on. Bhagee is only effective when he is in a good mood and there are holes in the pitch for him to exploit.

[Ustad]

In ODIs : Saqlain In Tests : Bhajji

:hysterical:

[KKR88]

In ODIs : Saqlain In Tests : Bhajji

:hysterical: what joke lol

[El_Pipita]

Bhajji isnt that **** cmon guys lol

[vvvslaxman]

Ask Aussies 99% will say Bhajji:cantstop:

[ganeshran]

:hysterical:

:hysterical: what joke lol

I hope you are not using Lahori logic for your comparison. In ODI's Mushtaq was much better than Bhajji, but in tests he wasnt that effective at all Bhajji has taken 393 test wickets compared to Sucklain's 208. The average difference is less than 1.5. Bhajji's strike rate is better than Mushtaq's. So in effect, Bhajji has maintained a better strike rate and a very similar average but over a much larger time period and also taken 185 more wickets. So in tests Bhajji >>>> Sucklain In ODIs Sucklain >>>> Bhajji

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Switchblade]

We already had 1 before Afridi vs Harby plz plz not again

[Switchblade]

Hope Ajmal vs Harbhajan thread is not coming up next :cantstop:

[punjabi_khota]

Saqlain was brilliant in a few series but so was Bhajji. And Bhajji is still going, while Saqi bhai is content getting hit for sixes in local paki and brit T20 leagues publishing new papers on choutha, paanchwa and chata balls etc, while watering his beard 5 hours a day.

[vvvslaxman]

Saqlain was brilliant in a few series but so was Bhajji. And Bhajji is still going' date=' while Saqi bhai is content getting hit for sixes in local paki and brit T20 leagues publishing new papers on choutha, paanchwa and chata balls etc, while watering his beard 5 hours a day.[/quote'] Saqlain came, saw, sehwaged :cantstop:

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Iconoclast]

In ODIs : Saqlain In Tests : Bhajji

What about T20's .. I think Bhaji would be better in that too .. just dont ask him to bowl the last over :hysterical::hysterical: IIRC Saqlain was the first spinner who would regularly bowl the death overs.

[Ustad]

I hope you are not using Lahori logic for your comparison. In ODI's Mushtaq was much better than Bhajji, but in tests he wasnt that effective at all Bhajji has taken 393 test wickets compared to Sucklain's 208. The average difference is less than 1.5. Bhajji's strike rate is better than Mushtaq's. So in effect, Bhajji has maintained a better strike rate and a very similar average but over a much larger time period and also taken 185 more wickets. So in tests Bhajji >>>> Sucklain In ODIs Sucklain >>>> Bhajji

"Dude It is not even a contest. In a Better system Saqi probably would have ended up with 500 Test wickets whereas Harbhajan wouldn;t have been picked to play test cricket in a better system. Saqlain you get the feeling was stopped by injury more than anything, whereas Harbhajan recently has begun to struggle even in conditions you once saw him dominate in." here a external link about this look at the scores lol: http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/38062-saqlain-mushtaq-vs-harbhajan-singh.html

[jusarrived]

both are at Par . None of them great test bowlers , while Saqlain was a very good ODI bowler .