Let's talk about the DRS

[Ranjha]

Isn't it illegal for Steve davis to be umpiring? In one over, he gives 2 consecutive thick edges as lbws and then calls it a 5 ball over. Disgusting.

[fineleg]

Dhoni: We'd rather use 20% right umpires rather than 80% or 90% UDRS Dhoni

[achilles]

Kumar takes the cake, mate.

[EnterTheVoid]

Sorry but we are in no position to complain. The UDRS is in place so that howlers such as these can be avoided.

[Ranjha]

UDRS has to be implemented without a doubt...

[Sid]

Dhoni:UDRS doesnt give 100% guarantee

[Ranjha]

It will still be better than these shockers any day.

[achilles]

Dhoni:UDRS doesnt give 100% guarantee

Correction- Dhoni: UDRS doesn't 100% satisfaction, neither does durex. Be smart, avoid both.

[Hindustani]

Isn't it illegal for Steve davis to be umpiring? In one over, he gives 2 consecutive thick edges as lbws and then calls it a 5 ball over. Disgusting.

he probably just had the elderly moment, India just got lucky that this didn't happen yesterday or the match would not had gone till lunch on 5th day :eyedance:

[diegovegaz]

freaking decisions i feel umpires love decisions against india dharmsena too, standing in his first test, made it count

[achilles]

freaking decisions i feel umpires love decisions against india dharmsena too, standing in his first test, made it count

The man from your avatar needs to do what he is doing to Dharmasena :two_thumbs_up:

[ZodiaC]

But Dhoni want life jackets with warranty wonly :dontknow:

[gaurav92]

We deserve this for not taking UDRS

[thongale]

Isn't it illegal for Steve davis to be umpiring? In one over, he gives 2 consecutive thick edges as lbws and then calls it a 5 ball over. Disgusting.

The disgusting point is that with UDRS both of them would have been deemed as not-outs. Don't blame Davies, blame BCCI and the Indian players who kept refusing it. UDRS may not be conclusive on tight decisions, but will eliminate those shockers.

[vvvslaxman]

Dhoni: We'd rather use 20% right umpires rather than 80% or 90% UDRS Dhoni

:cantstop:

[Ranjha]

Maybe in the long term, this is good as India may agree to UDRS. Maybe these decisions are a tactic by ICC thru Steve Davis to get India onboard....lolllll

[Lord]

The disgusting point is that with UDRS both of them would have been deemed as not-outs. Don't blame Davies' date= blame BCCI and the Indian players who kept refusing it. UDRS may not be conclusive on tight decisions, but will eliminate those shockers.

wat if the refferals were utilsed by Gauti n Dravid already? thats my grouse with UDRS.It depends so heavily on utilisation by players however not defending Dhoni n co.they should have it as its still miles better than umpires

[thongale]

wat if the refferals were utilsed by Gauti n Dravid already? thats my grouse with UDRS.It depends so heavily on utilisation by players however not defending Dhoni n co.they should have it as its still miles better than umpires

They will be "utilised" if the decision stood out. If a decision is changed they are left with the original number of attempts. Players should know what to refer and what not to. Not knowing that fact is not a problem of UDRS, but of players. SL - IND series in 2008 was a good example. SL players ONLY asked for UDRS when they knew that they had nicked it when given LBW or when they knew it was not when given for bat pad. But very less for marginal LBWs.

[cowboysfan]

we have no right to complain,none whatsoever.deal with it muchachoes.

[Ranjha]

I felt bad for Laxman. He deserved a hundred for this effort of him.