NareshK Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 This is a bit of an old video but for those of you who havent seen it.:winky: aBAMDCv5c9A Link to comment
gaurav92 Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 WTF did they even appeal ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
fineleg Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 This dismissal is from Surrey vs Leeds/Bradford UCCE at The Oval, 15th April 2007. The batsman is Tom Merilaht, the Surrey wicket-keeper is Jon Batty, and the bowler is Mohammad Akram.The umpire at the bowler's end is Ian Gould Link to comment
ganeshran Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 This is what the top rated comment on youtube says This dismissal is from Surrey vs Leeds/Bradford UCCE at The Oval, 15th April 2007. The batsman is Tom Merilaht, the Surrey wicket-keeper is Jon Batty, and the bowler is Mohammad Akram.The umpire at the bowler's end is Ian Gould.Some pundits... speculate that in the previous over, the batsman had hit the wicket but the umpire had called over.So it was mutually agreed that the bowler would bowl a ball and then he be given out next delivery Link to comment
rkt.india Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 This dismissal is from Surrey vs Leeds/Bradford UCCE at The Oval, 15th April 2007. The batsman is Tom Merilaht, the Surrey wicket-keeper is Jon Batty, and the bowler is Mohammad Akram.The umpire at the bowler's end is Ian Gould.Some pundits... speculate that in the previous over, the batsman had hit the wicket but the umpire had called over.So it was mutually agreed that the bowler would bowl a ball and then he be given out next delivery :cantstop: Link to comment
gaurav92 Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 speculate that in the previous over, the batsman had hit the wicket but the umpire had called over.So it was mutually agreed that the bowler would bowl a ball and then he be given out next delivery :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Seen b4, but :cantstop: Link to comment
james Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 From what i remember it is fake and done for some advert. Link to comment
Cricket Tragic Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 They interviewed the umpire on the BBC a while back and he said that it was fake. Link to comment
achilles Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 The worst is this- soi3VcbW-YU Pakistan teaching the world the meaning of "Spirit of Cricket" after this dismissal. And we bought their hoax in the next game when Yousuf kicked the ball away from an Indian bowler fielding on the follow-through and we didn't appeal. But the face of Inzi is pure genius. "I didn't know the rules".... after 15yrs in the game, trust a player to come up with that :hysterical: Link to comment
akshayxyz Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Advertisement is the first word came to my mind. I hope it is one. Link to comment
Sid Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 The best part of that Inzi dismissal was Inzi's post match presentation quote: In Faislabad we left the ball, I am out and now we stop the ball, I am out :cantstop: Link to comment
glogirl Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 achilles please post the link i couldn't see the video... Link to comment
achilles Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 achilles please post the link i couldn't see the video... [ame=youtube.com/watch?v=soi3VcbW-YU&feature=player_embedded]here[/ame] Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 The best part of that Inzi dismissal was Inzi's post match presentation quote: In Faislabad we left the ball, I am out and now we stop the ball, I am out :cantstop: Yeah, Inzi :good: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Mariyam Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Was it right/ in the spirit of the game to appeal that obstruction by Inzamam? Thanks for sharing this. What happened at Faislabad? Link to comment
Sid Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Was it right/ in the spirit of the game to appeal that obstruction by Inzamam? Thanks for sharing this. What happened at Faislabad? He was given run out,evading a throw from the bowler. KMI4o2SZp2Y Link to comment
Pioneer Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 The worst is this- soi3VcbW-YU Pakistan teaching the world the meaning of "Spirit of Cricket" after this dismissal. And we bought their hoax in the next game when Yousuf kicked the ball away from an Indian bowler fielding on the follow-through and we didn't appeal. But the face of Inzi is pure genius. "I didn't know the rules".... after 15yrs in the game, trust a player to come up with that :hysterical: Obsessed ? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now