Holysmoke Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Thats messed up. Even when there is an india-pak match tomorrow They shouldve atleast had something like a preview what the hell are moore and broads comments doing there seriously, thats messed up.. Link to comment
Predator_05 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 deliberate? They left "Broad & Anderson seal England win" along the match bulletin and gallery, and the Broad article is up top as a main headline (even above the Sardesai tributes !!). Strange, isn't it ? Link to comment
yoda Posted July 2, 2007 Author Share Posted July 2, 2007 Its still there where? i am not talking about the side link. the writeup, the little section in the main page. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Its still there It's still here. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 nope its not there.. it has been taken Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Thats messed up. Even when there is an india-pak match tomorrow They shouldve atleast had something like a preview .. here is how i see, if Aus-Eng were playing a one off ODI in bermuda would it make a headline in CI ? Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 here is how i see' date=' if Aus-Eng were playing a one off ODI in bermuda would it make a headline in CI ?[/quote'] yes i think it wud.. i see this cricinfo is very biased and they r up against indians.. dont know the reason for it though....... Link to comment
yoda Posted July 2, 2007 Author Share Posted July 2, 2007 i think our series section would still be intact if we had lost as it would have been accompanied by some sensational writeup. Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 yes i think it wud.. i see this cricinfo is very biased and they r up against indians.. dont know the reason for it though....... alright even if they are bias why the hell should i care what they think abt Indo-Pak rivalry. I dont need a non-indian site to recognize every game India plays. its not as if since they dont cover the game, its not going to be played. its their loss as they are missing on so many hits which could have come. Link to comment
Dhondy Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Still has an Indian editor though, in Sambit Bal. Dileep, you might as well quit now and join us. :teeth_smile: Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Big deal. Years ago Times of India chief editor (forgot his name now) was once asked why are your reports so biased ? he had a simple answer, you dont like our reports stop reading my paper. Link to comment
supportdada Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 not to worry about that rite now... worry about beating pakistan Link to comment
gator Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 who cares.... wen u care, u give em satisfaction.... Link to comment
King Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Things are gong to change now that ESPN Star have taken over. ESPNStar has fantastic fan base in India and they will care a hoot about appeasing the Poms. We will see more of Sub continent and Aussie coverage in future I think. Their favorite subject is of course Tendulkar. They don't have much to write when Tendulkar has been adjudged MOS in two series in a row. They have nothing to write you see. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now