India vs England 2012

[Raghav_12]

Well played. But could have been better.

[Sidhoni]

Jinxed!

[NareshK]

GOod innings. But not enough . Needed an innings like Pujara's 134 last match. Even that was not enoughh

Pujara is a grafter and so is Cook. We need more batsmen who will spend loads of time on the wicket and score runs by taking singles on slow pitches. Batsmen like Yuvraj and Kohli(who is not showing a lot of patience atm) wont cut it at the test level on these tracks.

[CSK Fan]

Jinxed!

How do you know it didnt jinx him into scoring a 50 for the first time in this series?

[indiaregulator]

Because he didn't sa "Sachin will get a 50", he said "Sachin will get 100"

[indiaregulator]

Anderson has now taken Sachin's wicket the most times, 8 , on par with Murali.

[BERGKAMP]

no shame in that, after steyn anderson has been the best bowler in the world in the last 5 years.

[indiaregulator]

no shame in that, after steyn anderson has been the best bowler in the world in the last 5 years.

Try telling some people on here that.

[NareshK]

no shame in that' date=' after steyn anderson has been the best bowler in the world in the last 5 years.[/quote'] Funny that you seem to hate trundlers and yet you say Anderson is the "best" bowler who is another trundler. He doesnt bowl more than 130 kph. Vinay, Mithun are actually quicker than him.

[Trichromatic]

no shame in that' date=' after steyn anderson has been the best bowler in the world in the last 5 years.[/quote'] Ajmal

[Trichromatic]

Funny that you seem to hate trundlers and yet you say Anderson is the "best" bowler who is another trundler. He doesnt bowl more than 130 kph. Vinay, Mithun are actually quicker than him.

Both are slower than him. Many people hated Australian team in 2000s, that doesn't they didn't consider that team to be best.

[CG]

Try telling some people on here that.

Zaheer khan has similar figures to anderson even though he played most matches on flat tracks in india.

[NareshK]

Both are slower than him. Many people hated Australian team in 2000s, that doesn't they didn't consider that team to be best.

No, no. Only Indian bowlers who bowl 130 kph are trundlers. Anderson, Bresnan and Broad who also bowl around 130 are "bessht phasst bollers in the wold".

[BERGKAMP]

Funny that you seem to hate trundlers and yet you say Anderson is the "best" bowler who is another trundler. He doesnt bowl more than 130 kph. Vinay, Mithun are actually quicker than him.

:hysterical: please don't even mention their names in the same post as anderson. anderson has skittled out all countries home and away, if our **** brigade trundlers could do that i would be a convert.

[Nova]

Anderson is only good on seaming wickets. Looks like an average bowler otherwise. Don;t understand why he is hyped him so much. He did bowl good today though. And taking someone's wicket 8 times does not mean the bowler is the best. Ponting was Bhajji's bunny, does that mean Bhajji was the best spinner? I hear someone saying "Yes".

[Stuge]

Time to Shoo this thread away :winky:

[daryl1985]

Anderson is only good on seaming wickets. Looks like an average bowler otherwise. Don;t understand why he is hyped him so much. He did bowl good today though. And taking someone's wicket 8 times does not mean the bowler is the best. Ponting was Bhajji's bunny, does that mean Bhajji was the best spinner? I hear someone saying "Yes".

This is a seaming wicket?

[Nova]

This is a seaming wicket?

Where did I say it was? not good enough in my opinion to be labeled the best bowler. :dontknow:

[Crookbond]

Where did I say it was? not good enough in my opinion to be labeled the best bowler. :dontknow:

Tdigi - Anderson is only good on seaming wickets. Daryl1985 - Anderson was good today, therefore this should be a seaming wicket.

[Trichromatic]

Anderson is only good on seaming wickets. Looks like an average bowler otherwise. Don;t understand why he is hyped him so much. He did bowl good today though. And taking someone's wicket 8 times does not mean the bowler is the best. Ponting was Bhajji's bunny, does that mean Bhajji was the best spinner? I hear someone saying "Yes".

Bhajji was second best spinner after Kumble in India. Even though he wasn't good, but that doesn't mean he can't be second best. Same goes for Anderson. Even though he is an average bowler, there aren't many better than him.